Submission Details
der8auer`s CPU Frequency Ergebnis - Elite League
8337.98 MHz mit AMD FX-8350 at 8338MHz
Ranglisten Position
33rd
WR Rang:
33rd von 15950
33rd
Globale Rangliste
33rd von 15949
10th
FX-8350 Rang:
10th von 279
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Globale Punkte (UGP)
33rd
65.0 Punkte
-
Hardware Punkte (UHP)
10th mit FX-8350
44.0 Punkte
Points earned for team league
-
Globale Team Power Punkte (GTPP) 21st Im Team
89.4 Punkte
-
Hardware Team Power Punkte (HTPP) 6th Im Team verwendet FX-8350
35.0 Punkte
Mediengallerie
- Verifikations URL, Bilder, Checksumme
- https://valid.x86.fr/gsqepf
Hardware Details
Arbeitsspeicher Details
- Produkt: Dominator GT
- Typ: DDR3 SDRAM
- Timings: CL7.0 7-7-21 1T
VGA Details
- Geschwindigkeit: Mhz / Mhz (Bestand)
Mainboard Details
- Hersteller: ASUS
- Model: ROG Crosshair V Formula
- Chipsatz: 990FX
-
Neueste Kommentare
der8auer Kommentierte sein eigenes Ergebnis:
disabling cores helped a little but seems like this is the max :|
Xtreme Addict sagt:
all in all, great CPU
Rady sagt:
pscheck and rog connect ? have you try more volt ?
nice cpu !
der8auer sagt:
Tried up to 2,10 Volt but it didn't scale. Basically PSCheck. Set the BCLK in the BIOS and set the multi in windows with PSCheck. Any chance that a Crosshair Formula-Z is better than the non Z version?
Moose83 sagt:
Nice Roman!
BenchBros sagt:
Top10 CPUz... nice!
Do you think its MB limit and not CPU limit? Does it feels like there is more in this CPU, when VCore doesn't scale?
der8auer sagt:
Thanks
Yesterday Stefan and me were able to bench 1M at 8277 MHz twice. Usually the max frequency and max 1M clock are not within 60 MHz on AMD. That's why I think it should reach a higher max clock.
Rady sagt:
for me the non-z formula is better you can desabled all core from the bios . on the z version you can desabled module but no core .
der8auer sagt:
Okay so I will stick to the non-z version and just try again. It could also be a thermal problem so I might try to polish the CPU and test a different TIM.
nfszocker sagt:
Nice Roman:)
steponz sagt:
Maybe try slow mode switch?
steponz sagt:
Great overall CPU.. amazing 1m
Massman sagt:
Have you tried enabling all cores, then setting 3 CU's to low frequency (~300mhz), instead of disabling the cores.
What I usually do is create 3 P-states.
Assign P4 state to all the shit cores (so they will be at the lowest power consumption), set P1 to the best core and do all the tweaks/apps, then take best core to P4. Wait a minute or so (to drop the temperature), then switch to P0 for validation.
It also works for SuperPI. Waiting at low clock to reduce temp and them upclock for bench. You can also assign explorer.exe to specific cores (the shit ones) so when you open an application, it will automatically select another core than the one you're pushing.
l0ud_sil3nc3 sagt:
Crazy cpu dude.
FlanK3r sagt:
did you tried all modules? I think CU1/CU2, CU3...Soemtimes is the best CU2 or CU1, not C0
der8auer sagt:
Yea. CU3 is by far the worst with about 7,4 GHz max. CU2 does 7,6 max clock and CU0 8,1. CU1 is the best with 8338.
HiVizMan sagt:
Very very nice CPU and great scores, can not come close to that frequency so for 32mil am having to work very hard on efficency. Roman you have set the bar really high, outstanding mate simply outstanding.
Bitte einloggen oder register to comment.