Submission Details
der8auer`s CPU Frequency score - Elite League
8337.98 MHz with AMD FX-8350 at 8338MHz
Ranking position
33rd
WR Rank:
33rd out of 15950
33rd
Global rank:
33rd out of 15949
10th
FX-8350 rank:
10th out of 279
Points earned for overclocker league
-
World Record Points
33rd
-
Global Points
33rd
65.0 Points
-
Hardware Points
10th using FX-8350
44.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) 21st in team
89.4 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 6th in team using FX-8350
35.0 Points
Media gallery
- Verification URL, image, checksum
- https://valid.x86.fr/gsqepf
Hardware details
Memory details
- Product: Dominator GT
- Type: DDR3 SDRAM
- Timings: CL7.0 7-7-21 1T
VGA details
- Speed: MHz / MHz (Stock)
Mainboard details
- Manufacturer: ASUS
- Model: ROG Crosshair V Formula
- Chipset: 990FX
-
Recent Comments
der8auer commented on his own score:
disabling cores helped a little but seems like this is the max :|
Xtreme Addict says:
all in all, great CPU
Rady says:
pscheck and rog connect ? have you try more volt ?
nice cpu !
der8auer says:
Tried up to 2,10 Volt but it didn't scale. Basically PSCheck. Set the BCLK in the BIOS and set the multi in windows with PSCheck. Any chance that a Crosshair Formula-Z is better than the non Z version?
Moose83 says:
Nice Roman!
BenchBros says:
Top10 CPUz... nice!
Do you think its MB limit and not CPU limit? Does it feels like there is more in this CPU, when VCore doesn't scale?
der8auer says:
Thanks
Yesterday Stefan and me were able to bench 1M at 8277 MHz twice. Usually the max frequency and max 1M clock are not within 60 MHz on AMD. That's why I think it should reach a higher max clock.
Rady says:
for me the non-z formula is better you can desabled all core from the bios . on the z version you can desabled module but no core .
der8auer says:
Okay so I will stick to the non-z version and just try again. It could also be a thermal problem so I might try to polish the CPU and test a different TIM.
nfszocker says:
Nice Roman:)
steponz says:
Maybe try slow mode switch?
steponz says:
Great overall CPU.. amazing 1m
Massman says:
Have you tried enabling all cores, then setting 3 CU's to low frequency (~300mhz), instead of disabling the cores.
What I usually do is create 3 P-states.
Assign P4 state to all the shit cores (so they will be at the lowest power consumption), set P1 to the best core and do all the tweaks/apps, then take best core to P4. Wait a minute or so (to drop the temperature), then switch to P0 for validation.
It also works for SuperPI. Waiting at low clock to reduce temp and them upclock for bench. You can also assign explorer.exe to specific cores (the shit ones) so when you open an application, it will automatically select another core than the one you're pushing.
l0ud_sil3nc3 says:
Crazy cpu dude.
FlanK3r says:
did you tried all modules? I think CU1/CU2, CU3...Soemtimes is the best CU2 or CU1, not C0
der8auer says:
Yea. CU3 is by far the worst with about 7,4 GHz max. CU2 does 7,6 max clock and CU0 8,1. CU1 is the best with 8338.
HiVizMan says:
Very very nice CPU and great scores, can not come close to that frequency so for 32mil am having to work very hard on efficency. Roman you have set the bar really high, outstanding mate simply outstanding.
Please log in or register to comment.