Submission Details
knopflerbruce`s Cinebench - R11.5 score - Extreme League
12.91 cb with 2x AMD Opteron 6132 HE at 2400MHz
Ranking position
4994th
WR Rank:
4994th out of 10260
484th
Global 16x CPU rank:
484th out of 493
1st
2x Opteron 6132 HE rank:
1st out of 1
Points earned for overclocker league
-
World Record Points
4994th
-
Global Points
484th using 16 CPU
-
Hardware Points
1st using 2x Opteron 6132 HE
6.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not PURE's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 1st in team using 2x Opteron 6132 HE
5.2 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: 2x AMD Opteron 6132 HE 'Magny-Cours'
- Cooling: Air (Custom)
- Cores: 2,400MHz(+9.09%)
Memory details
- Type: 16383MB DDR3 SDRAM
VGA details
- Model: GeForce GTX 480 (GF100) NVIDIA
- Speed: 700MHz / 924MHz (Stock)
Recent Comments
ObscureParadox@3XS says:
Getting gold globals without even OC'ing
Nice one!
knopflerbruce says:
I could overclock if I used a different board
GENiEBEN says:
Wrong screenshot / matched to wrong cpu ?
knopflerbruce says:
Depends. HWBot doesn't have a system that takes properly care of CPU subs with different # of cores. I can't select one 8 core chip and a 12 core chip, so posting my scores in this category to get my well earned ( ) points is the easiest fix. Also, as my rig is always slower than these servers, they don't lose any HW points here I think.
There are s few similar SR2 subs in the 1x 8870 rankings, using one quad and one hexa, so this issue is well known already. Maybe time for a fix?
lLLUMINATI says:
im confuse for your screen i dont now what are you doing
lLLUMINATI says:
insert again sir if you can
lLLUMINATI says:
why your PC MARK very worst and bad score
knopflerbruce says:
PCMark removed, as it wasn't suppsoed to be there.
Score is bad because I used a 1st gen 30gb SSD, and the CPU speed is very low.
GENiEBEN says:
Think you missed the point here Knut, SS shows AMD Opteron while the score is in the Xeon 8870 category....
Mr.Scott says:
Just make a new category for it and call it ES.
knopflerbruce says:
http://hwbot.org/submission/2323466_dhenzjhen_wprime___32m_xeon_e7_2860_2sec_562ms
and
http://hwbot.org/submission/2271587_stevero_wprime___32m_xeon_e7_2860_2sec_624ms
This was an issue a year ago, and was mentioned here:
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=43606
...and also here:
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?p=170425&highlight=e5620#post170425
There's no indication that this practise is not OK. I do have some possible solutions in my head, but for now this is "legit enough" (I could move my scores to e7 2870 instead, if that helps).
Mr.Scott says:
OPTERON IS NOT INTEL
This should not be hard for you to understand.
knopflerbruce says:
Click the links I provided... look at the screenshots... closely. Don't tell me that e5620 + x56XX = e7 2870 either. Too hard to understand, perhaps?
Antinomy says:
I think there should be an update to the rules regulating such a case. For GPUs the was a rule that "lower GPU+higher GPU = dual higher GPU". Meaning 4850+4870 = dual 4870. So that it does allow to get some points with two cards without making flaws in the system.
Maybe we should make "global points only" submissions so you can manually set the core count for mixed submissions but not give any hardware points for them.
Mehdi_FXX says:
seems some sockets are in a mistake...any way Nice Score & point
Mehdi_FXX says:
@ Mr.Scott: yeap even MB is AMD, he can Edit CPU name but this edit don`t change his Global score
knopflerbruce says:
The GPU case is a bit different. I benched an Opteron 6128 together with a 6132. Those scores will be posted as 2x Opteron 6132, due to the rule you refer to. However, say you bench a 4870 and a 4870x2, then the current way to deal with it is to use the 3x 4870 ranking, as it's matches the correct # of GPUs. It's pretty much the same thing I'm doing here, except I don't have a fitting category to put them in.
I've posted a few suggestions in a classifieds thread... let's see if there will be a quick fix then.
riska says:
knopflerbruce the screenshoot you have uploaded is done with 2 Amd opteron cpus and you say that this is an intel cpu you can only make the 10core thing you are rambling about with 2 intel cpus 4core and 6core not with 2 amd cpus..
knopflerbruce says:
I wouldn't be surprised if I can, by using 4 and 6 core C32 Opterons
Nonetheless, brand is irrelevant. My scores are not in the right category, but it's not worse than posting 1366 Xeons in a 2011 category either. They're also misplaced, an apparently acceptable solution to a weird issue - as shown in links posted in an older post.
I won't respond to questions regarding the category of the scores. The logic and precedence has been explained already.
Antinomy says:
A "mixed CPU configuration" checkbox on the submit page a manual selection of core count giving only global, and no h/w points should be a nice solution.
Mr.Scott says:
LOL. That's the most ridiculous logic I've ever heard.
Hey, think anyone will mind if I use an Ivy and submit in the FX categories? Same logic applies.
MrPaco says:
This ^^^
With the ability to input multiple cpu models in a given submission.
ie: one X5687 (four cores) and one E5645 (six cores)
But the issue would still be; Under what cpu category would it ranked?
The x5687 or the e5645?
Can always create some sort of new category based on the cpu combinations used; "MIXED CPU".
So when looking up the cpu x5687 as you normally would in the drop down menu it will also show "&" e5645.
example:
Xeon X5680
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5606
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5607
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5620
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5630
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5640
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5645
Xeon X5680 & Xeon E5649
Xeon X5687
etc...etc...
Combinations will be added to list as members make the various mixed cpu submissions.
Just an idea that may spark another idea/solution from someone else since the ability to use mixed cpus exists but are being submitted under confusing/conflicting circumstances. No fault of the submitter/member, just no place to put them n rank them appropriately n correctly.
Yamunsa says:
+1 for mixed option. can't imagine it would be an issue to add a drop down if the initial cpu chosen is enterprise level.
as to subbing catagory i understand that currently the larger of the 2 cpus used in a sub would need to be the lead unit. with a mixed cpu option i imagine it would make no difference unless the participant is chasing HW points or cups... saying that mixed subs could just catch globals and there would be no issues.
knopflerbruce says:
I'd say the one with the most computing power should be the "leading" chip. I guess it's not possible to mix entirely different chips, so an easy way to figure that out would be # of threads * frequency for all chips, and choose the one that gets the higher "performance number"
Yamunsa says:
not entirely true. i have been experimenting with some success using interlago mixed with abu dhabi and can confirm they can work together however cpuz doesn't like it, TPC doesn't like it and occasionally supermicro doesn't like it lol.
Antinomy says:
Thank you guys. I suggest mixed categories should receive only global/WR points. Otherwise it will give too much possibilities to cut the corners. In fact, using mixed configs to submit in non-standard global categories is already cutting the corners but a rather legal one.
Mr. Paco, I assume you to be the first who runs a system with 8 different CPUs?
MrPaco says:
Only if knopflerbruce dosnt do it first or any of the other multi-socket benchers
:nana:
That would make for one helluva run LOL....
knopflerbruce says:
Well, if I cared, I could buy some chips and do a 4+8+12+16 core Interlagos or Abu Dhabi setup 40 cores
Please log in or register to comment.