Submission Details
I.nfraR.ed的Cinebench - R11.5成绩 - 极限联盟
1.85 cb 和 AMD Sempron 145 在 6481MHz
排名位置
9378th
世界纪录排名
2nd
全球1x CPU排名:
1st
Sempron 145 排名:
Points earned for overclocker league
-
世界纪录分数(UWP)
9378th
-
全球分数(UGP)
2nd 使用 1 CPU
-
硬件分数(UHP)
1st 使用 Sempron 145
62.0 积分
Points earned for team league
-
全球战队能量分 (GTPP) 2nd 战队使用1 CPU
145.2 积分
-
硬件战队能量分(HTPP) 1st 战队使用Sempron 145
51.8 积分
硬件细节
CPU细节
- 型号: AMD Sempron 145 'Sargas'
- 散热: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 6,481MHz(+131.46%)
内存细节
- Manufacturer: Crucial
- 产品: Ballistix (classic)
- 散热: Air (Stock)
- 类别 2048MB DDR2 SDRAM
- 速度:: @ 463MHz
- Batch: D9GKX
- 计时: CL4.0 4-4-5 2T
显卡细节
- 型号: GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 256 Mb (G84) NVIDIA
- 速度:: 450MHz / 400MHz ()
主板细节
- 厂商: DFI
- 型号: LANParty DK 790FXB-M2RSH
- 散热: Liquid Nitrogen
- 芯片组: 790FX
-
近期的评论
I.nfraR.ed 评价他自己的分数:
No idea why it doesn't want to run higher on CB11.5, while it does 6.6+ on CB15.
ObscureParadox@3XS 说:
Holy mother of jebus
Moose83 说:
Just awesome!
robbo2 说:
Great result mate
Calathea 说:
Kind of neat Very weird chip behaviour though compared to R15, had it been the other way around I'd understand.
I.nfraR.ed 说:
Yes. It feels stable, can run CB15 at much higher frequency, does not bsod, just crashes - sometimes even immediately.
It's not the HT link, RAM or NB frequency. If I drop the cpu multi it will run, so it's the cpu. And it's the same in 3 different sessions.
Hope that's enough for this stage though.
Maybe I could try XP x64 next time.
Bong313 说:
wow! nice score ivan!
kotori 说:
Awesome!
Farjam 说:
amazing test again
Wizerty 说:
As I told you, on mine it's really hard to reach hi freq on seven
I.nfraR.ed 说:
Wiz, is that for CB11.5 only or in general? You told me before, but I don't remember.
Because it does way higher frequency for other benchmarks, while for CB11.5 higher vcore makes things worse. For example it crashes on the same 6480 with 1.8V. It also feels very stable - I can do whatever I want in OS - unpack zip files, run CB15 all day long, but it simply crashes in CB11.5. Spent a lot of time to get that 6480 run.
HT Ref is not a problem, because I can boot even at 500 and most of my scores are done with HT Ref set in bios and direct boot to OS.
For example that 6940 validation was done with direct boot at 496 HT Ref.
Couldn't make 497x14 no matter what - tried direct 497 boot or with setfsb in os - black screeb and restart. I set multi with K10stat, ofcourse.
For 7GHz I would need 500x14 and that was not possible. Maybe with 1.95+ V on the cpu...I don't know.
Wizerty 说:
In general... BUT, last time, I switch to my old OS, the one I use everyday on my computer, and I don't know why but it can boot with hight HTT.... crazy, I try 3 seven, no go, I take an old one with lot of programme... and it work.
So try on other one.... or XP 64
请登录或注册后才能评论