IanCutress says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Nice one

I.M.O.G. says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Futuremark URL man!

Otherwise, nice score.

SteveRo says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Looking good but please add futuremark link!

Gluvocio says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

unbelieveble virus scan... I have to test that mainboard too

Sweet says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Woow nice . very nice bro !!

congratz

El Gappo says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Link for the pcmark police even tho it isn't a hwbot requirement and all the info is there

http://3dmark.com/pcm05/3140746

Christian Ney says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

link added to submission

Sweet says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Link for the pcmark police even tho it isn't a hwbot requirement and all the info is there

 

http://3dmark.com/pcm05/3140746

Yes by now, this is truth, maybe change in the future.

Link (ORB) isnt necessary by now, besides this run has no doubt.

Anyway El Gappo put the link

ScunnyUK says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Awsome result Olly , great work bud

I.M.O.G. says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Gappo: Since I've been submitting top scores in PCMark the past month or so, those who have been running it longer always requested Futuremark URLs. Never seemed like much hassle to post it, and it seemed like a polite gesture. Not to mention, when we post top scores we should set an example for others... Many newer PCMark05 competitors submit screenshots where not all subtests are visible and there is no futuremark URL. It is simply good form to include it.

scooter.jay says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Nice work waiting to go faster soon

just_nuke_em says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Very nice

Raul SDT says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Nice run! Any pics ?

SteveRo says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Well done Mr Elgappo! Also everyone - see the rules re top 20 -

General PCMark05 submission rules

Any online PCMark05 submission must comply to the following rules: ...

""have a valid futuremark orb link as verification for scores in the top 20"

MGFDerp says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Way to bench el gappo

Christian Ney says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Well done Mr Elgappo! Also everyone - see the rules re top 20 -

 

General PCMark05 submission rules

 

Any online PCMark05 submission must comply to the following rules: ...

 

""have a valid futuremark orb link as verification for scores in the top 20"

Actually this top 20 is the Global Top 20, not all Top 20 (1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, ... CPU), that's why I made a poll to have it mandatory for all top 20.

http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=27930

Sweet says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Well done Mr Elgappo! Also everyone - see the rules re top 20 -

 

General PCMark05 submission rules

 

Any online PCMark05 submission must comply to the following rules: ...

 

""have a valid futuremark orb link as verification for scores in the top 20"

Yep Steve, like i write before, only Global Top 20 by now, if that change, will be different, but i dont know, when and how, soon perhaps

Sorry about that, when the rules change for only top 20( not global), I'll be in trouble

Edit : dont have many valid keys

El Gappo says:

12 year and 4 months ago –

Cheers guys.

Gappo: Since I've been submitting top scores in PCMark the past month or so, those who have been running it longer always requested Futuremark URLs. Never seemed like much hassle to post it, and it seemed like a polite gesture. Not to mention, when we post top scores we should set an example for others... Many newer PCMark05 competitors submit screenshots where not all subtests are visible and there is no futuremark URL. It is simply good form to include it.

It's cool, just don't think everyone should have to buy a key or be put off submitting results because they don't have one. We would be losing most of the high core count results it it were necessary.

I do however think 2 screenshots should be made a requirement.

Nice run! Any pics ?

Not much to look at, just a warm up tho as will be getting properly cold next week

Moose83 says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

So this VS is too high! What have you used? Ramcaching? Sector size change?

explain, 1,5G isnt possible with sempron onboard!

IanCutress says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

Maybe it's one of those '1 in 20' awesome scores

El Gappo says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

Done when the read ahead and write back cache raid rom came out and that's all that was used. I think this was even before the dodgy 12.8 drivers were released?

Go untangle your panties and worry about your own scores buddy.

Moose83 says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

I think it was prereleased 12.8 driver...

Ask SteveRo or Gluvocio, no one can do such an VS on sempron. And acards onboard are slower than SSDs, i tested a lot on 990FX, normal VS is between 800 and 1000.

Explain it to Mr. Pro, lets see if he can verify your VS;)

says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

Good job, Ollie, I dont have a key and prolly wont need one, lol

El Gappo says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

lol pre-released... I think you're just mad I reported a bunch of your BS scores

The score was already checked yesterday along with the other perfectly legit scores you reported

If Pro-digy asks and it aids in shutting you up I will gladly explain

Dualist says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

^^^^ awesome :nana::nana::nana::nana:

dhenzjhen says:

11 year and 7 months ago –

lolol guappo!