Great Score man! Despite the low BCLK capability, pushing DDR4 on this CPU Class will still be fun if they have an IMC close to the K-series Skylake then
I'm surprised XMP is working on these chips! Can you dial in the memory timings manually too?
is BCLK not unlocked like everyone was talking about?
The Q0 engineering samples were unlocked; the R0 retail are not. In fact, due to the new implementation of BCLK (external PLL), the frequency range is even more limited than on previous platforms. So yeah, we won't be seeing much over 103 MHz on these chips.
The Q0 engineering samples were unlocked; the R0 retail are not. In fact, due to the new implementation of BCLK (external PLL), the frequency range is even more limited than on previous platforms. So yeah, we won't be seeing much over 103 MHz on these chips.
Well ... maybe ... we'll see ...
Where did you find this? I've not been able to find anything about it anywhwere and I'm aure the early reports about Q0 said they were locked too
Who finds the bios which firmware detects only Q0 cpus instead of R0? Bclk oc should be possible than. 103Mhz is a joke, external pll should actually give a lot more bclk than those internal ones we had with haswell but it seems like intel is doing anything to stop oc on budget pcs.
der8auer的Core i3 6320 在 3990MHz,使用ASUS Maximus VIII Gene主板 -
近期的评论
der8auer 评价他自己的分数:
Interesting CPUs. Locking straight at 102.6 BCLK. Coulnd't read out the memory with CPU-Z. Done with 3000C15 (xmp ftw).
说:
Not bad Roman !
XMP Ftw ^^
nfszocker 说:
Nice score, for xmp;)
ObscureParadox@3XS 说:
By interesting do you mean no fun?? 102.6BCLK max kinda makes me not want to bother with Skylake i3
leeghoofd 说:
I5 6400/6600/6700 and co are all the same... you tried on cold too Roman ?
leeghoofd 说:
I saw 3066 mem divider Sam
TaPaKaH 说:
What memory multipliers are available with these i3 (and locked Skylake in general)?
der8auer 说:
Can't remember exactly but was quite high. 3600 even higher. 3200 MHz worked fine even on stock SA. So IMC doesn't look bad.
Lucky_n00b 说:
Great Score man! Despite the low BCLK capability, pushing DDR4 on this CPU Class will still be fun if they have an IMC close to the K-series Skylake then
Dinos22 说:
those points lol
Lays 说:
is BCLK not unlocked like everyone was talking about?
Massman 说:
I'm surprised XMP is working on these chips! Can you dial in the memory timings manually too?
The Q0 engineering samples were unlocked; the R0 retail are not. In fact, due to the new implementation of BCLK (external PLL), the frequency range is even more limited than on previous platforms. So yeah, we won't be seeing much over 103 MHz on these chips.
Well ... maybe ... we'll see ...
ObscureParadox@3XS 说:
Where did you find this? I've not been able to find anything about it anywhwere and I'm aure the early reports about Q0 said they were locked too
Massman 说:
http://hwbot.org/newsflash/2956_wccftech_reports_overclocking_enabled_on_locked_skylake_cpus_%28but_its_not_true%29/
der8auer 说:
Yea memory and timings work without any problems
Marquzz 说:
Little sad. Was hoping that I could up the BCLK on i3s and get an healthy overclock. Damn you Intel
Strunkenbold 说:
Who finds the bios which firmware detects only Q0 cpus instead of R0? Bclk oc should be possible than. 103Mhz is a joke, external pll should actually give a lot more bclk than those internal ones we had with haswell but it seems like intel is doing anything to stop oc on budget pcs.
请登录或注册后才能评论