Submission Details
Le score de Sweet sur PCMark Vantage - Extreme League
10357 marks avec Intel Xeon W3520 à 4018MHz
Position dans le classement
n/a
Global 4x CPU classement:
14th
Xeon W3520 classement:
14th sur un total de 18
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
Not Sweet's best submission
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
14th utilisant Xeon W3520
3.2 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not ocXtreme's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) 9th en équipe utilisant Xeon W3520
2.0 Points
Gallerie photos
- URL, image ou code de vérification
- http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=205217&resultType=18
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: Intel Xeon W3520 'Bloomfield'
- Refroidissement: Air (Custom)
- Cores: 4 018MHz(+51.05%)
-
Détails mémoire
- Type: 6144MB DDR3 SDRAM
- Fréquence: @ 765MHz
- Chronomètres CL6.0 7-6-16 1T
Détails carte graphique
- Modèle: Radeon HD 4770 (RV770 Pro) ATi
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Fréquence: 905MHz (+20.67%) / 1 105MHz (+38.13%)
Détails carte mère
- Chipset: Foxconn BloodRage x58
Commentaires récents
Sweet a commenté son propre score:
Try 3520 + xfx 4770
FlashG dit :
Please re-read the rules about PCMARK Vantage submissions. A valid FutureMark ORB link is acceptable in lieu of a screen shot.
FlashG
Christian Ney dit :
1 - Futuremark removed/or changed the link of a lot of score from theire database. At the end of 2010 and this result is from 2009
Trying to find the result atm. EDIT : didn't find it(using the ID and the search option).
2 - So has his score is with a trial serial, that meens he cannot change settings, so the score is runned at default settings(1nd rule), benchmark score is clearly showed(2nd rule), cpuz tab showed(4th rule), settings not showed but as he used a trial key he cannot change settings so it's ok(3rd rule).
3 - ATM it's not mandatory to show subtest scores.
And btw : The exemple screenshot in the rules is not right(not showing all mandatory tab and it's a pic of PCMar05).
So according to the actual rules this score is legit.
4 - Screenshot is mandatory only since fall of 2010
Christian Ney dit :
Ho, in fact you posted under Sweet submission because he blocked one of yours. Not to said his submission is not right.
Screenshot is mandatory since fall of 2010
Rules haven't been updated, it has to be done btw
EDIT : here is the thread : Screenshot Mandatory
dit :
No it is not.
This was front page news and first posted on the 27th Oct 2010
Flash could you please not create a thread to discuss a member when what you wish to discuss has nothing to do with that member.
It would have been far better to simply start a thread expressing your inquiry about the rules.
And you are quite correct the rules do need updating and they will be.
However the new Rev of HWBOT is the primary focus of most of the development and BOT mantainence staff. A benchmark that does not impact of either global nor hardware points is understandably low on their list of priorities at this time. So please bare with us and submit your scores with a full and comprehensive screen. Remember more information is better than the barest minimum.
Sweet dit :
I think , in July 2009, I try the PCMark Vantage with this cpu, a simple test with air cooling without much Mhz in the Cpu.
Anyway, at that time was not needed as much information as I put on the screen.
But as written 1Day and Christian Ney, since 01/11/2010, all information is required in the screen.This is for all submission, and for all from that time, even for me.
Screen shot is mandatory, with all required, that's all
Thanks Christian and 1Day, for the explanation for FlashG
Regards
Sw
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter