Submission Details
Le score de gtxx58 sur MaxxMem Read Bandwidth (alpha) - Extreme League
13022 MByte/sec. avec DDR2 SDRAM à MHz
Position dans le classement
928th
WR Rank:
928th sur un total de 1111
928th
Classement général:
928th sur un total de 1111
1st
DDR2 SDRAM classement:
1st sur un total de 138
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
928th
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
1st utilisant DDR2 SDRAM
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not Hardware Canucks's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) 1st en équipe utilisant DDR2 SDRAM
0.0 Points
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 'Wolfdale-6M'
- Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 5 436MHz(+81.20%)
-
Détails mémoire
- Manufacturer: Walton Chaintech
- Produit: Apogee GT
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Type: 2048MB DDR2 SDRAM
- Chronomètres 6-5-6-16
Détails carte graphique
- Modèle: Radeon HD 6450 (GDDR3, 64bit) (Caicos) AMD
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Fréquence: 625MHz / 667MHz (Stock)
Détails carte mère
- Fabricant: GIGABYTE
- Modèle: GA-EP45-DQ6
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Chipset: P45
-
Détails disque
- Capacité: 120GB (IDE)
Détails alimentation
- Alimentation: 850 Watt
Commentaires récents
M1RROR dit :
v3.0 version show higher score than classic V1.95 its some cheating, need to improve rules
gtxx58 dit :
I redo it if you want !
gtxx58 dit :
This is simple, beat it with v3.0 :)
Remarc dit :
to M1RROR this bench is one big bug and very strange why has not it been removed yet
TerraRaptor dit :
+100500. I was testing it with Am2 this weekend and get anything from 2500MB/s to 12000MB/s with same settings. No chance to get consistent results at all.
unityofsaints dit :
So I'm guessing tRP didn't help the score? ;)
M1RROR dit :
I will never use version 3.0, for what?
gtxx58 dit :
This is just a cpuz bug, trp is at 5
gtxx58 dit :
For me it’s pretty consistent from 11600 to 13000, if I considered it as a bug, I’m not submitted it, maybe it’s score higher but I don’t think by 1000. If I compare my results with you terraraptor, on the same setting I do about the same.
TerraRaptor dit :
your result is quite in line with others (mine included) so noone blames this is cheat or undoable - I even liked it :) I really like your clocks here.
The bench itself sucks. While superpi gives 0.5% spread from from to run this buggy bench gives me +/-xx% difference with intel and +/-xxx% difference with AMD between runs.
PS. I decided to skip benching maxmemm2 after review of the following results:
13263 - https://hwbot.org/submission/1020832_ageom_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_916.6_marks/
13447 - https://hwbot.org/submission/1022472_armannaddafi_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_936.2_marks/
13092 - https://hwbot.org/submission/939077_endea_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_788.6_marks/
gtxx58 dit :
I agree with you, on amd side it seem not predictable, the score done with striker, I think it legit, Nvidia chipset is Faster than p45, x48 on memory
gtxx58 dit :
Maybe other memory bench is more accuracy!
Noxinite dit :
Don't forget that apparently if you run the CPU slower then the bench runs for longer and you get a higher memory score. This bench shoud ideally have points stripped from it.
yosarianilives dit :
Yeah let's drop this buggy mess
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter