Submission Details
bigblock990`s Cinebench - R15 score - Elite League
771 cb with Intel Core i3 7350K at 6783MHz
Ranking position
9497th
WR Rank:
9497th out of 13401
51st
Global 2x CPU rank:
51st out of 1660
1st
Core i3 7350K rank:
1st out of 194
Points earned for overclocker league
-
World Record Points
9497th
-
Global Points
51st using 2 CPU
-
Hardware Points
1st using Core i3 7350K
70.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not Overclock.net's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 1st in team using Core i3 7350K
47.3 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: Intel Core i3 7350K 'Kaby Lake-S'
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 6,783MHz(+61.50%)
-
Memory details
- Product: Hall of Fame
- Type: 16384MB DDR4 SDRAM
- Speed: @ 2,026MHz
- Timings: 12-12-12-28-1T
VGA details
- Speed: MHz / MHz (Stock)
Mainboard details
- Chipset: Z170
Recent Comments
bigblock990 commented on his own score:
ASRock Z170m OC Formula. Thanks Team Yellow!
Noxinite says:
Awesome!
mllrkllr88 says:
Going after those gravy dualie points :D How did you find this one?
Luumi says:
Atleast this is a retail one.
shar00750 says:
Wow ??? great work bro ???
SparkysAdventure says:
Oh my god, almost 6.8g R15 on a retail 7350k! Absolutely amazing!
leeghoofd says:
mellow yellow internal team battle
GtiJason says:
Great score, bet we see BB990 push this to 6.8
unityofsaints says:
Since Benchmate is known to affect Cinebench scores this needs to go in the dedicated CB15 with BenchMate category imo
rtsurfer says:
Life is unfair. Go on you lucky bugger.
l0ud_sil3nc3 says:
dafuq congrats BB!
yosarianilives says:
Correct
GtiJason says:
Does it ? Quick n' Dirty comparison of the Top 10 submissions simply based on amount of CB points earned per MHz of freq is showing this.
Keep in mind BigBlock990's score is the only one done with BenchMate AND most the lower efficiency subs are old, basically from launch meaning probably didn't run as much as more recent runs to squeeze out that last 0.0001% of perf
Efficiency Score
Rank cb per MHz score User Rank
5th 0.1136603773584906 753 Ikki 10th
6th 0.1135628656949897 755 Dancop 9th
9th 0.1132245020218661 756 ale belo 8th
10th 0.1131907308377897 762 funsoul 7th
7th 0.1133928571428571 762 Xtreme Addict 6th
2nd 0.113944817300522 764 Loud 5th
8th 0.1133165456969338 765 rsannino 4th
3rd 0.1137644615840997 767 Luumi 3rd
1st 0.1140650527253824 768 Splave 2nd
4th 0.1136665192392747 771 bigblock990 1st
_mat_ says:
This is not true, BenchMate does not change CINEBENCH scoring. CINEBENCH uses timeGetTime() which uses the system's clock interrupt to accumulate time. The time source for the clock interrupt in Windows 8 and 10 is either the LAPIC timer by default or HPET (useplatformclock = true). The LAPIC timer is exactly the same timer as RDTSC, the CPU's timestamp counter. Because timeGetTime() is not precise enough (a timestamp can be skewed by 10 ms for example due to the accumulation and a rude division to be backwards compatible), I decided to use the more precise CPU timestamp instead for CB. This is the same time source, just more precise. The score doesn't really change, but it's more stable.
Switching to HPET for the whole system (useplatformclock) would affect the CINEBENCH scoring a lot more.
unityofsaints says:
@GtiJason @_mat_ You're both missing the point. I didn't say this particular score was bugged and I didn't say BenchMate actively changes Cinebench scoring. I'm just stating that CB15 with Benchmate constitutes another benchmark, since e.g. it allows Windows 10 while CB15 without Benchmate doesn't. It wouldn't be fair on anyone to mix those two.
bigblock990 says:
Thanks everyone!
@unityofsaints You are missing the point. Benchmate is the the way forward. If we require all benches to have a separate category "with benchmate" then what is the point of staying on hwbot? It would make WAY more sense for matt to create his own database, and leave hwbot behind.
Also you are incorrect about win10. All skylake and newer intel platforms are legal on any OS with or without benchmate.
GeorgeStorm says:
I believe @unityofsaints is pointing out the current rule only, not saying that in the future benchmate will be integrated with the main category.
Matt26LFC says:
Great score! Congrats!
Splave says:
remove score and ban bigblock pls and thnx
_mat_ says:
I believe so too. I think a decision from HWBOT is needed here. Either go with BenchMate or go without.
Achill3uS says:
If this not deserves the 161 global, I dont know what... the floor is drama
Noxinite says:
If we're talking in technicalities then the score is legal for only this category that it was submitted to as their is no validation file from the Benchmate utility. And the rules do not state that you can't have other utilities running at the same time (e.g. Benchmate).
keeph8n says:
^^^^^^^ a screenshot is a screenshot
unityofsaints says:
For Benchmate to be "the way forward" it needs to be open-sourced instead of relying on 1 or 2 developers. As it stands it's a handy tools for some special cases like Geekbench on Win 10.
_mat_ says:
I have no problem to make BenchMate open source. I just doubt that there would many advantages, instead it give insight on how to trick it. Especially the HWBOT submission and its mandatory requirement to store zhe encryption key inside the executable would be easily visible.
But I am open to discuss this further!
My idea was to give the source code away to an overclocker I deem trustworthy to push this forward even without me available/alive.
Goku is Gei says:
I can see why people said dual core is no longer suitable for gaming, even this dual core world record cpu can only reach 771cb, while most mainstream modern cpu are already 1kcb+ on r15
Please log in or register to comment.