Submission Details
Le score de bigblock990 sur Cinebench - R15 - Elite League
771 cb avec Intel Core i3 7350K à 6783MHz
Position dans le classement
9453rd
WR Rank:
9453rd sur un total de 13350
51st
Global 2x CPU classement:
51st sur un total de 1658
1st
Core i3 7350K classement:
1st sur un total de 193
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
51st utilisant 2 CPU
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
1st utilisant Core i3 7350K
70.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not Overclock.net's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) 1st en équipe utilisant Core i3 7350K
47.3 Points
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: Intel Core i3 7350K 'Kaby Lake-S'
- Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 6 783MHz(+61.50%)
-
Détails mémoire
- Produit: Hall of Fame
- Type: 16384MB DDR4 SDRAM
- Fréquence: @ 2 026MHz
- Chronomètres 12-12-12-28-1T
Détails carte graphique
- Fréquence: MHz / MHz (Stock)
Détails carte mère
- Chipset: Z170
Commentaires récents
bigblock990 a commenté son propre score:
ASRock Z170m OC Formula. Thanks Team Yellow!
Noxinite dit :
Awesome!
mllrkllr88 dit :
Going after those gravy dualie points :D How did you find this one?
Luumi dit :
Atleast this is a retail one.
shar00750 dit :
Wow ??? great work bro ???
SparkysAdventure dit :
Oh my god, almost 6.8g R15 on a retail 7350k! Absolutely amazing!
leeghoofd dit :
mellow yellow internal team battle
GtiJason dit :
Great score, bet we see BB990 push this to 6.8
unityofsaints dit :
Since Benchmate is known to affect Cinebench scores this needs to go in the dedicated CB15 with BenchMate category imo
rtsurfer dit :
Life is unfair. Go on you lucky bugger.
l0ud_sil3nc3 dit :
dafuq congrats BB!
yosarianilives dit :
Correct
GtiJason dit :
Does it ? Quick n' Dirty comparison of the Top 10 submissions simply based on amount of CB points earned per MHz of freq is showing this.
Keep in mind BigBlock990's score is the only one done with BenchMate AND most the lower efficiency subs are old, basically from launch meaning probably didn't run as much as more recent runs to squeeze out that last 0.0001% of perf
Efficiency Score
Rank cb per MHz score User Rank
5th 0.1136603773584906 753 Ikki 10th
6th 0.1135628656949897 755 Dancop 9th
9th 0.1132245020218661 756 ale belo 8th
10th 0.1131907308377897 762 funsoul 7th
7th 0.1133928571428571 762 Xtreme Addict 6th
2nd 0.113944817300522 764 Loud 5th
8th 0.1133165456969338 765 rsannino 4th
3rd 0.1137644615840997 767 Luumi 3rd
1st 0.1140650527253824 768 Splave 2nd
4th 0.1136665192392747 771 bigblock990 1st
_mat_ dit :
This is not true, BenchMate does not change CINEBENCH scoring. CINEBENCH uses timeGetTime() which uses the system's clock interrupt to accumulate time. The time source for the clock interrupt in Windows 8 and 10 is either the LAPIC timer by default or HPET (useplatformclock = true). The LAPIC timer is exactly the same timer as RDTSC, the CPU's timestamp counter. Because timeGetTime() is not precise enough (a timestamp can be skewed by 10 ms for example due to the accumulation and a rude division to be backwards compatible), I decided to use the more precise CPU timestamp instead for CB. This is the same time source, just more precise. The score doesn't really change, but it's more stable.
Switching to HPET for the whole system (useplatformclock) would affect the CINEBENCH scoring a lot more.
unityofsaints dit :
@GtiJason @_mat_ You're both missing the point. I didn't say this particular score was bugged and I didn't say BenchMate actively changes Cinebench scoring. I'm just stating that CB15 with Benchmate constitutes another benchmark, since e.g. it allows Windows 10 while CB15 without Benchmate doesn't. It wouldn't be fair on anyone to mix those two.
bigblock990 dit :
Thanks everyone!
@unityofsaints You are missing the point. Benchmate is the the way forward. If we require all benches to have a separate category "with benchmate" then what is the point of staying on hwbot? It would make WAY more sense for matt to create his own database, and leave hwbot behind.
Also you are incorrect about win10. All skylake and newer intel platforms are legal on any OS with or without benchmate.
GeorgeStorm dit :
I believe @unityofsaints is pointing out the current rule only, not saying that in the future benchmate will be integrated with the main category.
Matt26LFC dit :
Great score! Congrats!
Splave dit :
remove score and ban bigblock pls and thnx
_mat_ dit :
I believe so too. I think a decision from HWBOT is needed here. Either go with BenchMate or go without.
Achill3uS dit :
If this not deserves the 161 global, I dont know what... the floor is drama
Noxinite dit :
If we're talking in technicalities then the score is legal for only this category that it was submitted to as their is no validation file from the Benchmate utility. And the rules do not state that you can't have other utilities running at the same time (e.g. Benchmate).
keeph8n dit :
^^^^^^^ a screenshot is a screenshot
unityofsaints dit :
For Benchmate to be "the way forward" it needs to be open-sourced instead of relying on 1 or 2 developers. As it stands it's a handy tools for some special cases like Geekbench on Win 10.
_mat_ dit :
I have no problem to make BenchMate open source. I just doubt that there would many advantages, instead it give insight on how to trick it. Especially the HWBOT submission and its mandatory requirement to store zhe encryption key inside the executable would be easily visible.
But I am open to discuss this further!
My idea was to give the source code away to an overclocker I deem trustworthy to push this forward even without me available/alive.
Goku is Gei dit :
I can see why people said dual core is no longer suitable for gaming, even this dual core world record cpu can only reach 771cb, while most mainstream modern cpu are already 1kcb+ on r15
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter