Today`s top benchmark scores.

Benchmark Hardware Frequency User Score Points
XTU Core i3 6320 4000.9 MHz pho5ph0ric 736 marks 55.8 pts 0   0
XTU Core i7 6700K 5100 MHz SAMBA 1773 marks 53.6 pts 0   0
XTU Core i7 6700K 4780 MHz ksateaaa23 1656 marks 41.4 pts 0   0
XTU Core i7 5820K 4500 MHz Sperson1 1853 marks 35.0 pts 0   0
3DMark2001 SE GeForce 7600 GT PCIE GDDR3 785/980 MHz Luumi 73468 marks 33.4 pts 2   0
XTU Core i5 6600K 4800 MHz dumo 1457 marks 31.3 pts 0   0
Cinebench - R15 Core i7 6700K 5900 MHz RULE 1297 cb 31.1 pts 0   0
Cinebench - R11.5 Core i7 6700K 5900 MHz RULE 14.36 points 30.1 pts 0   0
XTU Core i7 5960X 4630 MHz runit3 2470 marks 29.3 pts 0   0
XTU Core i7 5960X 4600 MHz vdelvec 2447 marks 27.8 pts 1   0


HWBOT Articles

Today we are in for a real treat as the Overclocker in Focus series gets talking to a rising star from Indonesia, the one and only Coldest. In recent years Coldest has quickly risen up the HWBOT hierarchy, becoming an important member of the Indonesia team in the process. Welcome to a fireside chat with a true OC evangelist, competitor and winner. Welcome to our friend Coldest.

"Why the cheap hardware can improve the growth of the community of Overclocking? We can just see the examples, just like when Intel released the Pentium anniversary… Pentium G that can overclock. We can invite overclockers in Indonesia, for amateurs to learn overclocking with a low budget with the cheap CPU and as you know also the Z87 and there are some Z97 motherboards with a cheap price also, so they can learn overclocking. "

Continue reading

Hardware news

Elmor's Lab: Independent Core Overclocking for Haswell-E

Elmor has a small section on the forum reserved for his overclocking research projects. For example, there is a support thread for the EVC software. Yesterday Elmor shared a small software application to overclock the cores of your Haswell-E processor independently.

Quick re-cap: overclocking an Intel processor typically goes via the Turbo multipliers, a set of ratios unlocked on -K and -X processor SKUs. (Edit*) The Turbo frequency is configured on utilization basis, assigning a specific frequency to a certain type of load. For example on an 8-core part, if any three cores are in use they will be boosted to the configured 3-core ratio while the five idle cores stay at the base frequency.

For AMD processors the situation is a bit different as all cores can be clocked independently. That is why you will often see 8GHz+ CPU overclockers with all other cores clocked to 800MHz or lower. Having independent frequency control for each core helps you push for better benchmark results in single threaded benchmark applications as you are not restraint by the weaker cores in the CPU.

The software tool Elmor developed works in combination with TurboC Core and is currently only tested on the Rampage V Extreme motherboard. As Elmor writes: "When first started it will ask you 'Init per core mode?', entering 'y' will apply the current max ratio to each core. After that you use TurboV Core only to set your maximum possible ratio. If you want you can just set it to 80 and forget about it until next reboot. Whatever ratio you set in this software will now be applied on a per core basis."

You can find all details and download information in the forum thread. Good luck!


(EPIC) The Truth about CPU Soldering - Der8auer Tries Solder Thermal Interface on Skylake

So, sometimes people complain about the relatively weak thermal interface material on the new Intel processors. Especially compared to their HEDT counterparts, which have a solder based TIM, it seems that it's a low-balling approach to use plain thermal paste on a CPU that still costs over USD $400. Well, luckily we have Der8auer who takes the time to explain the problems with solder and even tries to solder TIM on the 6700K Skylake. This is a good read, I promise!

The gist of the article comes down to this: micro-cracks in the solder interface puts the CPU at higher risk of damage earlier in its total lifespan than conventional thermal paste does. In addition, mining the materials required for preparing the CPU for solder thermal interface (like gold and indium) is expensive and ecologically not that great. Regular ol' thermal paste may perform worse, all things considered it's a better choice especially for small sized processor dies.

Please have a look at for the full article and scientific background information. Amazing research!

The OC Show - S02E23: HWBOT X Overclocking Events & Ranking Embeds for Everyone!

In the 23rd and last episode of the season Pieter and Tim are back with another episode packed with news out of the OC community. Click on the image on the left or HERE. A list of the topics below:

  • - OC-Esports competition updates
  • - HWBOT X - event directory by and for the community
  • - HWBOT ranking embed feature
  • - GIGABYTE streaming a PC build guide and an overclocking guide
  • - Overclockers in Focus


Join the live Q&A on Sunday November 29 9PM on the OCTV twitch channel:

SergeyR Wins Rookie Rumble #24 Again, Kos_S Wins AMD #21... Again

The 24th installment of the Rookie Rumble on OC-ESPORTS has just concluded with a distinctly ‘Ground Hog Day’ flavor to it. Ukrainian overclocker SergeyR again makes a full sweep of all three stages to claim a second consecutive Rookie Rumble title. While in terms of AMD rookie action, we also see a repeat of the previous round with Kos_S taking the AMD Rookie Rumble #21 title. Let’s look at the stages, scores and winners in a little more detail.

Secondly congrats to SergeyR for a dominant display that saw him not only claim all three stages once again, but also hit a number of scores that out-do his previous personal bests from the last round. Also congrats to and TAGG for their efforts in reaching second and third places on the podium. We should keep an eye on these two rising stars.


Congrats to all the AMD enthusiasts who took part. Especially to Kos_S who proved once again to be a worthy champion.

Full article at

Futuremark Tightens RTC Validation Check Following Tecmundo and Rbuass Findings

Futuremark is improving the detection of all types of 'gaming' of their benchmark software. Two weeks ago we reported on the removal of a ton of Hall of Fame submissions due to LOD alteration and following the Rbuass' findings shared in our forum and reported by Tecmundo, Futuremark is tightening the detection of the benchmark timer. For those who are not familiar with the problem, here is a brief overview of the Windows 8 / 8.1 / 10 RTC problem.

On August 8, 2013, we published an article detailing issues concerning the use of timer in Windows 8. The use of the RTC timer impacts the veracity of benchmark results in such a way that decreasing the base clock frequency at run-time will cause a drift in timer. In short, a second no longer consists of 1000 milliseconds, but consists of 1000 milliseconds times the decrease in base clock frequency. For example, a decrease of 5% in frequency would increase the 'time in a second' by 5%. Because the system is unaware of this, the benchmark result will seem 5% better. For more information and supporting data, I suggest you to read through our original article.

In a response, Intel hot-fixed the XTU benchmark and uses the more accurate HPET since v4.2.0.8. Early September Futuremark announced a fix for the Windows 8 RTC bug though the Systeminfo service. From that moment, the HWBOT moderators accepted 3DMark benchmark submissions on the Windows 8 (8.1/10) operating system provided a supplementary verification link as proof that the RTC was not tampered with.

On November 20, Rbuass showed in a YouTube video that it's possible to validate 3DMark submissions even if the RTC had been affected. Based on data provided by Rbuass it seems that if one stayed within a 2% margin, a benchmark result would still validate correctly. As we have learned over the past couple of days, this is possible because the timer validation process Futuremark uses on their online database compares the data from the HPET and RTC timer and flags the result as invalid if the difference is too large. For competitive overclockers 2% is a large margin as even with a single GPU in Fire Strike Extreme it can easily mean a difference of a couple of hundred points. It's important to note that any RTC drift, where the OS time is not real time, means the benchmark score is NOT valid.

Christian Ney, Head of Moderating, got in touch with Futuremark to see if anything could be done about the situation. At the moment of writing, Futuremark has already tightened the margin of the RTC and HPET timer for new submissions, meaning any result with RTC drift will be invalidated. In addition, based on historical data Futuremark will also sort through the current Hall of Fame submissions and re-evaluate the validity of the scores.

As Futuremark (in)validates the top benchmark results, the HWBOT staff will proceed checking the Global rankings as well. More information to follow.

SuperPI 32M 5 GHz Challenge Leaderboard (Nov 23, 2015) - Bullant Fastest at 5 minutes and 53.828 seconds with Haswell

Just like every month we have a look at the SuperPI 32M low-clock challenge threads in our forum and make a list of the most efficient overclocks for various CPU architectures. The fastest SuperPI 32M at 5GHz is Bullant's Hawell result of 5 minutes and 53.828 seconds which is slightly faster than his previous best of 5 min 53.890 sec. Check out the full table below. For more information and efficient SuperPI 32M overclocking results, check out the low-clock threads in our Overclocking and Tweaking sub-forum and the SuperPI 32M Low Clock - Fastest Per Architecture forum thread.

Congratulations to all the leaders in their specific categories!

SuperPI 32M Intel 5 GHz Challenge Leaderboard (Nov 23, 2015)

Category Time Overclocker CPU Memory Motherboard
Skylake 5 min 57.047 sec L0ud_sil3nc3 Core i7 6700K HyperX Predator 1936 MHz C11-16-16-28 ASRock Z170 OC Formula
Broadwell 6 min 18.925 sec Fugger Core i7 5775C Corsair Dominator Platinum ASUS Maximus VII Gene
Haswell-E 5 min 55.922 sec Dinos22 Core i7 5960X G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 1667 MHz C9-12-14-13 GIGABYTE X99-SOC Champion
Haswell 5 min 53.828 sec Bullant Core i7 4790K G.SKILL PI 1429 MHz C6-10-6-21 Z97X-SOC Force
Ivy Bridge 6 min 15.562 sec Bullant Core i7 3770K 1327 MHz C6-9-6-24 ASRock Z77 OC Formula
Sandy Bridge 6 min 30.359 sec Bullant Core i7 2600K G.SKILL PI 1134 MHz C6-8-6-20 GIGABYTE Z77X-UP4 TH

SuperPI 32M AMD 5 GHz Challenge Leaderboard (Nov 23, 2015)

Category Time Overclocker CPU Memory Motherboard
Kaveri 12 min 17.437 sec Zeropluszero A10-7850K 1198 MHz C8-11-9-18 GIGABYTE F2A88XN-Wifi
Vishera 14 min 9.391 sec Robbo2 FX-8350 G.SKILL PI 1300 MHz C8-11-8-24 ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z
Richland 14 min 9.156 sec Newlife A6-6420K G.SKILL TridentX 1184 MHz C7-10-10-8 GIGABYTE F2A88XN-Wifi
Trinity 14 min 11.016 sec Dinos22 A10-5800K Corsair Dominator 1333 MHz C9-12-12-24 GIGABYTE F2A85X-UP4
Zambezi 15 min 18.875 sec Bones FX-4200 1166 MHz C7-11-8-21 ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
Llano 14 min 3.188 sec D3mox A8-3870K G.SKILL RipjawsX 1056 MHz C7-10-7-24 GIGABYTE A75-UD4H
Kabini 20 min 42.391 sec Newlife Athlon 5350 Patriot Viper II Sector 7 1000 MHz C6-8-6-20 ASUS AM1I-A Win Novice Nimble #5

The fifth round of the 2015 Novice Nimble season has drawn to a close just a few days ago and for the first time we actually have a winner that is not Cowcotland. The French novices have finally been pipped at the post, with a US-based team edging out all competitors in the largest and most fiercely contested Novice Nimble round yet. Read on for a full appraisal of the stages, scoring and the final standings.

Just in case you are not fully conversant in the world of competitive novice-grade Overclocking, here’s a quick overview. The Novice Nimble series on OC-ESPORTS allows groups, or indeed teams of Novice-level overclockers to compete head to head. The contest requires that three team members submit scores in each of the five stages using different hardware. The average score of these submissions dictates the team’s standings on each stage.

Full article at

The Verge Discovers 87 Clockers, a 38-Chapter Manga Exclusively About Overclocking!

To most of the extreme overclockers it's no secret that 87 Clockers is manga with as central topic the world of competitive (extreme) overclocking. It's set in Japan and the main character is Ichinose, a male violinist who doesn't have a sense of direction in his life. One night he meets a mysterious girl who lives together with a cat and a guy called Mike - an overclocker.

From that point forward the story spins out in a series of (at the moment of writing) 38 chapters telling the story of competitive overclocking. It takes us to the International Space Station, where new SuperPI records are followed daily. The details of the manga are genuinely depicting the life of overclockers. In Chapter 18, for example, a man picks up an empty CPU box and reads "2012 week fourty-two, made in Malaysia." Let's be honest, that's all we need to know. In Chapter 35, we're following the World Championship where "3D HeatMan" scores are the main focus.

You can read the 87 Clockers manga in English here. Original news article at The Verge here.

Do-It-Yourself IHS Delid Device 3D Printing Models by SoF

Although the idea of taking off the hood of your processor isn't new, did it in 2003 with the Pentium 4, the discussion has certainly picked up pace with the launch of the Skylake processors. Two weeks ago Der8auer launched his Delid Die Mate in retail at Caseking, a tool that allows you to remove the heat speader safely from Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell, and Skylake based processors. At a retail price of 90 euro it certainly isn't the cheapest of tools on the market, but it beats having to buy a new 6700K because you accidentally cut traces on the PCB.

For even more die-hard DIY overclockers out there, there's an alternative solution available. On the forum, SoF from AwardFabrik shared a 3D print template for printing your own delid device. In function it seems to be fairly similar to the Delid Die Mate, but of course the build material is different. According to SoF the printing time on a MakerBot 5th gen and similar printers is between two to three hours.

More information and download links are available in the forum:

[PR] G.SKILL Boosts DDR4 8GB Module Speed Up to 4133MHz 16GB (8GBx2)

G.SKILL announces a series of ultra high performance DDR4 kits based on 8GB modules, from 3600MHz CL16 32GB (4x8GB) all the way up to the extreme speed of 4133MHz 16GB (2x8GB), featuring ultra-high quality Samsung ICs.

Seeing the growing demand for high capacity memory kit, G.SKILL continually dedicated itself to develop faster memory speed with 8GB DDR4 modules. And all the hard work has finally paid off. Now enthusiasts can experience faster transfer memory speed without compromising capacity. These new high speed DDR4 8GB module-based memory kits will join G.SKILL’s latest extreme performance Trident Z family and come with the latest XMP 2.0 overclocking profiles, allowing simple overclocking on compatible systems.

These new high capacity DDR4 kits are designed for the latest 6th Gen Intel Core processors and Z170 chipset platforms with the latest XMP 2.0 profile. The DDR4 4133MHz 16GB (2x8GB) kit has been validated with Intel Core i7-6700K CPU and ASRock Z170 OC Formula motherboard. A stress-testing screenshot of the memory kit can be found below.