322 pts Overclock.net

Stage 4 and Stage 6 Opteron allowed?

Yes, I'll add them to the stages

couple of problems with ice storm stage.

1. g3258 integrated graphics HD graphics(Haswell) not accepted for submissioin.

2. with sys info ver 5.19, graphic card not recognised.(is it valid for comp?)

42 minutes ago, ksateaaa23 said:

couple of problems with ice storm stage.

1. g3258 integrated graphics HD graphics(Haswell) not accepted for submissioin.

2. with sys info ver 5.19, graphic card not recognised.(is it valid for comp?)

Fixed the Pentium G3258,

Are you runing in diagnostic mode? Try another driver plz or systeminfo 5.18

44 minutes ago, ksateaaa23 said:

couple of problems with ice storm stage.

1. g3258 integrated graphics HD graphics(Haswell) not accepted for submissioin.

2. with sys info ver 5.19, graphic card not recognised.(is it valid for comp?)
>>snip<<

Try earlier versions of systeminfo (5.18. 5.17) Not sure if you'll get a valid link but they may detect your hardware properly.
I had issues with SystemInfo 5.18 a couple of months ago with: systeminfo-crashes-on-gpu-detection-module-gpu-z-dll

stage 6 submissions scores only note the GT Test scores..are we doing the just the graphics test and not overall?

10 minutes ago, mus1mus said:

stage 6 submissions scores only note the GT Test scores..are we doing the just the graphics test and not overall?

You need to run Physics and Combined to get a Valid link (Along with WHQL driver) anyway so I assumed it'd be overall score that counted and not just the GTs but looks like that isn't the case here.

Long time no see btw

Yes that's the catch in the 3D11 stage, you need a full run (to get a valid link)  but only sub the GPU score

On 8/2/2019 at 6:40 PM, Leeghoofd said:

Are you runing in diagnostic mode? Try another driver plz or systeminfo 5.18

not running in diagnostic mode. same result with ver 5.18 graphics is recognised as intel hd graphics(gpu sys info) on 3dmark screenshot but when validated online shows as generic vga.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38248579

Try win10 maybe, I see the others competitors using Win10

9 hours ago, Digg_de said:

Your Driver is too old. 

it's not.

this time hd graphics 4400, windows 10 and same drivr used by you. result is same. graphic card not recognised.

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/38265605

Sorry 0_0 hence why we put in Desktop HD Integrated graphics, no Iris pro stuff (no Broadwell also). Now for Country cup we can throw some mobiles in the mix

I hate to ask more questions but at this point fuck it, for the igp stage it says haswell (pentium) for allowed arch, does this imply that haswell i7 and i3 is not supposed to be allowed? If they are then is xeon allowed? Because xeon 1275 v3 with p4600 graphics running stock beats all except 3770k and 4770k igp for ice storm. So even running this xeon stock would beat a pentium g3258 OC'd to the wall or an i3 4170 (3770k is the only ivy igp worth running at all)

no, in the Dbase eg the G3258 is listed as Haswell (Pentium) , with this I want to state that you can run Haswell and Haswell (Pentium) CPUs, if you want I will add it so it becomes clearer

Again,  you have to use the hardware you either have in the team or find the best suitable one. If you want to spend your cash on a Xeon, be my guest ( no I'm not sponsored by Ebay of any kind :p)

4 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

( no I'm not sponsored by Ebay of any kind ?)

6 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

( no I'm not sponsored by Ebay of any kind ?)

 

With these comps you may as well be, missing out on some major cash flow  

54 minutes ago, Digg_de said:

BetrayedPredator: reported by user due to possible cheat (Haswell Refresh and not a Pentium haswell chip)

Who using this as second Account? ?

At the Benchmate Comp he reports me cause is was using Coffee Lake DDR4 and not a pre Skylake DDR4 Sys........

I think he got confused on the first, for the second I'm gonna have to ask his thought process ?

1 minute ago, yosarianilives said:

I think he got confused on the first, for the second I'm gonna have to ask his thought process ?

Don't appoint yourself the keeper of random people on the team just because you happen to share a discord server with them.  You're not a team captain, stop acting like you represent the team.

1 hour ago, Digg_de said:

BetrayedPredator: reported by user due to possible cheat (Haswell Refresh and not a Pentium haswell chip)

Who using this as second Account? ?

At the Benchmate Comp he reports me cause is was using Coffee Lake DDR4 and not a pre Skylake DDR4 Sys........

Yes I'm totally an alt account

The benchmate competition and this one has constantly changing rules that works great. Originally it wasn't allowing Skylake CPUs if I remember correctly

The better question is why reports show names? That's asking me to make an alt to literally avoid this exact situation of being dragged into shit that doesn't actually interfere with me. 

 

1 hour ago, Digg_de said:

BetrayedPredator: reported by user due to possible cheat (Haswell Refresh and not a Pentium haswell chip)

Who using this as second Account? ?

At the Benchmate Comp he reports me cause is was using Coffee Lake DDR4 and not a pre Skylake DDR4 Sys........

Why bring this up here?
Just answer it in the form man.....

Just now, BetrayedPredator said:

That's asking me to make an alt to literally avoid this exact situation of being dragged into shit that doesn't actually interfere with me.

Please do not make an alt.  Goes without saying but if I have any reason to think you're done that, all evidence will be forwarded to hwbot admins.

OC should have an atmosphere of good faith.  It's better to just talk with people respectfully if you're not sure about something.  Names are shown because communication is important, and if someone is mass reporting in bad faith it's important that can be seen.  As hwbot rules say;

Quote

Reporting submissions which are not suspicious but have minor mistakes is against the fair play spirit, and abuse of the reporting functionality will be acted upon.

To enable this, names have to be attached.

I think it might be a good idea to back off a bit and maybe just ask people if you're not sure about something, once a report is created for a valid score it means team captains are stuck with a notification until volunteer moderators can check and clear it.

48 minutes ago, mickulty said:

Names are shown because communication is important, and if someone is mass reporting in bad faith it's important that can be seen.  As hwbot rules say;

To enable this, names have to be attached.

No reason that names need to be transparent to users, should only be shown to mods and team captains.

So what is this act? , new aliases?  to submit with 2 different accounts?

12 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

So what is this act? , new aliases?  to submit with 2 different accounts?

Betrayedpredator is pretty active on the public r/oc discord.  Feel free to join and use the discord search function to check message history from him and yos - discord.gg/overclock

15 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

No reason that names need to be transparent to users, should only be shown to mods and team captains.

They'd get passed on in many cases anyway, better not to pretend they won't be.

Is that a yes or a no Mickulty? 

No funny business going on here as far as I'm aware.

55 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

Is that a yes or a no Mickulty? 

They're not multis/alts/whatever.  I'd tell you directly if they were.

Im trying to submit using socket 947 with a I7 4700MQ ( Laptop ) but it refuses .. Im guessing this socket is also not allowed ?

[quote]

10 minutes ago, mus1mus said:

stage 6 submissions scores only note the GT Test scores..are we doing the just the graphics test and not overall?

You need to run Physics and Combined to get a Valid link (Along with WHQL driver) anyway so I assumed it'd be overall score that counted and not just the GTs but looks like that isn't the case here.

Long time no see btw

Score submitted for the stage is the GPU score, however you need to fully run the benchmark to get the VALID link...

[quote]

Score submitted for the stage is the GPU score, however you need to fully run the benchmark to get the VALID link...

@Leeghoofd

I can't load the result with I3-3220 and I3-3240

Only these two cpus Griff or all datafiles from X265 ?

SC3: DDR3 - GPUPI v3.3 for CPU - 1B. Want to clarify "Use 2, 4, 6 processor core(s) in total."

Team shoud submit one result per each core count? Like one result from 2, one from 4, one from 6?

Or team may do three 6-core results? Like 1100T+1090T+1075T.

no, one from a 2 , one from a 4 and one from a 6 core cpu, unlocking cores is allowed, disabling not

4 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

unlocking cores is allowed, disabling not

thanks, will rebench my phenom then.

18 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Only these two cpus Griff or all datafiles from X265 ?

I think they disappeared from the database, nothing to do with the comp:

(same for https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_i3_3240/)

And another question, SC3: DDR3 - Memory Frequency, memory sticks probably should be different, but what about CPU, mobo? Is it allowed for team to use one same board with same processor, just 3 different kits of memory, or everything should not be the same?

only different mem kits, but provide proof of the team benching session with plenty of pictures/video plz

triple post

SC3: DDR3 - 3DMark11 - Entry (GPU)
I'm sure I entered this result into the comp: 4223023_cbjaust_3dmark11_entry_(gpu)_radeon_r9_280x_19457_marks/

Now it is not listed in the stage. Is there something wrong with the entry? I got no notification and it has apparently been silently removed from the comp...

• A VALID Futuremark verification link is required (systeminfo 5.17 or newer)

aw crap, I don't usually miss those: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/13451083

I cannot edit the original entry now, I supose you want me to re-upload the score, right? Anyway that's what I'll do.

Edit: And done.

The main Team Cup 2019 thread mentions a restriction of up to 6 cores for server CPUs for Stage 7 (dogpile), but I didn't see any mention of that restriction on the competition page. As such, it looks like there are a handful of submissions with 8-core Xeons. What's the ruling on this?

https://hwbot.org/submission/4232261

https://hwbot.org/submission/4226821

https://hwbot.org/submission/4226820

https://hwbot.org/submission/4226818

https://hwbot.org/submission/4209929

dogpile any cpu goes... rules on the compo page are final

[quote]

dogpile any cpu goes... rules on the compo page are final