564 pts Australia

For pcmark 7 will lga 1151v1 and v2 count as one or two different socket?

CC2020, HWBOT x265 Benchmark-4k, Use 1,3,5,7 processor core(s) in total. I think there is an error

2 hours ago, superpatodonaldo said:

CC2020, HWBOT x265 Benchmark-4k, Use 1,3,5,7 processor core(s) in total. I think there is an error

nope it can be done... someone tested it for me already ?

@yosarianilivesCPU Socket ranking type, thus counts as  2 different sockets

19 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

nope it can be done... someone tested it for me already ?

Is downcore allowed then? Or is it only unlock cores? Cause like no am3 cpu die has more than 6 cores... 

To achieve 7 cores in this stage it must be the only option... 

5 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

To achieve 7 cores in this stage it must be the only option... 

So assuming this goes for the other subs too. Meaning you want to downcore *lake or zen 2 for optimal scores on all 4 subs

Also is downcore allowed to get core counts for ycruncher? 

nope, only for the 7core score...

And off we go, thx DaQuteness!!

"A VALID Futuremark verification link is required registered on your HWBot name"

How strictly is this enforced?  I think my Futuremark name might be slightly different than my HWBot name (NiobiumOC or something), is that okay?

1 hour ago, niobium615 said:

"A VALID Futuremark verification link is required registered on your HWBot name"

How strictly is this enforced?  I think my Futuremark name might be slightly different than my HWBot name (NiobiumOC or something), is that okay?

As long it is not Splave ?

54 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

As long it is not Splave ?

Crap.

I'm out then.

Hyper PI 32M: where is the ranking?

Ranking? 

https://hwbot.org/benchmarks/

hyperpi is not in yet i guess

Neither is Port Royal... Sigh

Are quadros allowed for port royal?

Thats labelled as server  hardware , but if noone has an issue with these  I could authorise them

Vote here for Quadros in Port Royal stage

https://www.strawpoll.me/21205845/r

Similar question, for superposition are workstation/server cards like Radeon pro duo allowed? 

Also my 2c for quadros in pr is they shouldn't be allowed, but I did vote yes cause it'll be hilarious to see how pissed people are if it's allowed and someone posts monster score on one

2 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

Also my 2c for quadros in pr is they shouldn't be allowed, but I did vote yes cause it'll be hilarious to see how pissed people are if it's allowed and someone posts monster score on one

I do not think scores will even be better than a cold 2080ti. Probably best to just leave them as banned to make it fair for everyone 

So how ridiculous did this turn out. Some vote yes to create a stirr... Well you lot just ended any future use of a poll A nice round of applause...  My turn now... Will reconfigure tomorrow 

I don't really care if they're allowed I don't think it will make an impact, but they probably shouldn't be allowed just the same cause people don't like quadros in most stages. 

17 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

So how ridiculous did this turn out. Some vote yes to create a stirr... Well you lot just ended any future use of a poll A nice round of applause...  My turn now... Will reconfigure tomorrow 

Why not create different tiers and make overclocking the comp, as an example there are those that only have a 570 and can't compete at all with a 2080ti or 3090 so then creating specific tiers like 570, 580 etc.

My 0.002

3 minutes ago, Fragmeister said:

Why not create different tiers and make overclocking the comp, as an example there are those that only have a 570 and can't compete at all with a 2080ti or 3090 so then creating specific tiers like 570, 580 etc.

My 0.002

it is Country Cup, not about you as a single bencher. Port Royal needs to be pushed to new limits

5 hours ago, Fragmeister said:

Why not create different tiers and make overclocking the comp, as an example there are those that only have a 570 and can't compete at all with a 2080ti or 3090 so then creating specific tiers like 570, 580 etc.

My 0.002

That's just normal hwbot, idk but having 500+ stages in country cup is a maybe not the best idea. There are however cheap stages so everyone can participate 

In the GTX400 stage, is it possible to for example sub 3 x GTX480 as one score and 2 x GTX480 as another and have both be counted towards the overall score? Or is it one score per SKU?

one score for 480 SKU, 470,460,450 whatever makes you tick.

3DMark - Sky Diver (GPU) - 4 scores: gpu score or total score??

GPU score only counts , but score needs to be VALID at FM , so you need to run it fully

23 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

GPU score only counts , but score needs to be VALID at FM , so you need to run it fully

Ok, I asked because see subbed total score insted of gpu score

17 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

That's just normal hwbot, idk but having 500+ stages in country cup is a maybe not the best idea. There are however cheap stages so everyone can participate 

Good point

Reminder that crosshair 8 dark hero launched after the comp, want to make sure nobody subs and has to rebench on different board. Posting here and on Discord to make sure everyone sees it, don't think it will be a problem but will suck if someone does a sick 3000 series sub on the new board for country cup and can't use it. 

Unigine Superposition verification - only for paid access ?

57 minutes ago, tomekmak said:

Unigine Superposition verification - only for paid access ?

You need a key to get a validation link

Hi
HWBOT Country Cup 2020 - Unigine Superposition- 1080P Xtreme
Is there a problem?
Version error on the hwbot website.
It refuses my bench
Thank you for looking at

https://zupimages.net/viewer.php?id=20/45/3u1m.png

Hello my friends - nice to "see" you all again! Question about Stage 12 MathBenchmark... are MP server sockets allowed as long as they use desktop DDR2?

if you pop in one single processor yes

Reminder that basically all s771 boards use fbdimm which is not ddr2, so would need to be like socket F or something 

Yes, Socket F is what I had in mind. Thanks!

edit - oh, and one more question, sorry - for the purpose of this stage, do AM2 and AM2+ count as 2 sockets?

yes, unless I misconfigured

[quote]

19 hours ago, tomekmak said:

Unigine Superposition verification - only for paid access ?

You need a key to get a validation link

Sad

[quote]

nope, only for the 7core score...

32 minutes ago, tomekmak said:

[quote]

nope, only for the 7core score...

[/quote] It was changed ? Now i see 8 cores ? 7 cores was doable by disablng some in widows, same for 3 and so on.

yes but you couldn't submit the 7 core score ?

Superposition will get points in 2021, so maybe not a bad thing to support the developer

[quote]

yes but you couldn't submit the 7 core score ?

Core unlocking = OK

Core disabling = Not OK

...at least that's the way it's always been.

31 minutes ago, tomekmak said:

[quote]

yes but you couldn't submit the 7 core score ?

[/quote] So if i do score with for example on i5 2500k with 1 core disabled it will be ok ?

Nope that psychical a 4 core, you can only sub it as a 4 core. 

Dear sirs, thanks for all the great competitions.  On the Catzilla stage, are Titan Xp and older Titan cards allowed?

1 hour ago, TriOx.SGI said:

Dear sirs, thanks for all the great competitions.  On the Catzilla stage, are Titan Xp and older Titan cards allowed?

soz no Titans at all...

Ok thank you.  Are Radeon Pro Duo allowed for the Superposition stage?  This was asked already but I didn't see a response.

5 minutes ago, TriOx.SGI said:

Ok thank you.  Are Radeon Pro Duo allowed for the Superposition stage?  This was asked already but I didn't see a response.

yes no limitation

Another question. If i submit 4 scores with different hardware does it counts ? For example the same motherboard but 4 different cpu's ?

In the Memory Frequency competition, is it possible to send more than one result for different memory types? For example, I have a result for DDR1 and I posted it earlier, now I added the result for DDR3 and the result for DDR1 has disappeared. Is this a bug or is this competition only allowed 1 user = 1 result?

1 user : 1 result per stage...

do you mind changing my score on this submission to the gpu score (5329) and not the overall score of 6k? I forgot it was gpu score only

 https://hwbot.org/submission/4593042_melvinhans_3dmark___sky_diver_(gpu)_hd_graphics_630_6118_marks

edited mr panda

Is Ryzen PRO allowed? My laptop happens to have a Ryzen PRO APU in it, I've already subbed it for the Sky Diver stage:

https://hwbot.org/submission/4593865

But would be good to know if this is considered workstation hardware. I'd think not but better to clear up the ambiguity early on as I'm sure I won't be the only one thinking of subbing Ryzen PRO.

2 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Is Ryzen PRO allowed? My laptop happens to have a Ryzen PRO APU in it, I've already subbed it for the Sky Diver stage:

https://hwbot.org/submission/4593865

But would be good to know if this is considered workstation hardware. I'd think not but better to clear up the ambiguity early on as I'm sure I won't be the only one thinking of subbing Ryzen PRO.

Good question, my ebay purchases were just me assuming it'd be allowed, fuck trying to get the non pro version of 4000 series...

Is win 10 allowed on all stages or just for modern Hardware?

2 hours ago, ProKoN said:

Is win 10 allowed on all stages or just for modern Hardware?

I think normal win 10 rules apply, so Skylake and newer can run win 10, otherwise has to be benchmate, x265, or 3dmark/PCMark with valid link 

7 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Is Ryzen PRO allowed? My laptop happens to have a Ryzen PRO APU in it, I've already subbed it for the Sky Diver stage:

https://hwbot.org/submission/4593865

But would be good to know if this is considered workstation hardware. I'd think not but better to clear up the ambiguity early on as I'm sure I won't be the only one thinking of subbing Ryzen PRO.

allowed, this Pro cpu is not a problem for this stage

5 hours ago, ProKoN said:

Is win 10 allowed on all stages or just for modern Hardware?

Depending on the benchmark like Yosi mentioned, Study the rules per benchmark , if unsure ask first before benching.

KRIEG Matchbench has been updated by their developers. Version 1.1 only submissions

6 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

KRIEG Matchbench has been updated by their developers. Version 1.1 only submissions

Any idea why? Can't see anything on the website.

Also might pay to change the website download link on the stage 12 competition page.

link was changed to version 1.1 hours agoi, maybe refresh your page could help

https://www.krieg.tech/downloads/mathbenchmark_1.1.zip

Having trouble subbing a score for Superposition 1080P. Telling me I need to sub using 1.1 and that it is incomplete, but I am using correct version as far as I can tell?

Have verification link and screen as well if needed to verify

I'm having the same problem as AKM.  I double checked and version 1.1 is listed in my Leaderboard link.  Thanks.

HyperPi 32M Stage: disabling HT and/core is not allowed, right?

i.e. if cpu is a 4c/8t must run 8 instances, right?

Try again, see if you can submit superposition datafile now

18 minutes ago, superpatodonaldo said:

HyperPi 32M Stage: disabling HT and/core is not allowed, right?

i.e. if cpu is a 4c/8t must run 8 instances, right?

yes correct

For the Math-Stage: does an AM2 CPU on an AM2+ mainboard count as AM2 or as AM2+ result?

5 minutes ago, Luebke said:

For the Math-Stage: does an AM2 CPU on an AM2+ mainboard count as AM2 or as AM2+ result?

its defined as CPU Socket so the Bot "should" consider it as AM2... but sometimes it never stops to amaze me

don't remember if already asked: ryzen 5xxx allowed ot not?

38 minutes ago, superpatodonaldo said:

don't remember if already asked: ryzen 5xxx allowed ot not?

nope sorry no Vermeer

1 hour ago, Digg_de said:

HWBOT Country Cup 2020 - Memory Frequency

Verification screenshot includes CPUZ 1.94 (or newer) tabs for CPU, Memory & Motherboard. (For 3D GPUZ and GPUZ sensor tab)

 

No SPD Tab?

no it is okay, we can see that in the CPUZ verification link

Hello, I've tried to submit a Port Royal Score for Stage 1 and I'm receiving this error...

 "This submission was made with an Engineering Sample or unreleased hardware"

Why is this happening? I'm not using either an ES or unreleased hardware? 

58 minutes ago, SpinCykle said:

Hello, I've tried to submit a Port Royal Score for Stage 1 and I'm receiving this error...

 "This submission was made with an Engineering Sample or unreleased hardware"

Why is this happening? I'm not using either an ES or unreleased hardware? 

Don't submit with a XTU profile, enter all the hardware manually

1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:

Don't submit with a XTU profile, enter all the hardware manually

Thanks, I thought I tried that and was still running into an error. Maybe my score was accepted. I knew it wasn't going to be in the top 5 but I'd still like to participate.   

1 hour ago, SpinCykle said:

Thanks, I thought I tried that and was still running into an error. Maybe my score was accepted. I knew it wasn't going to be in the top 5 but I'd still like to participate.   

There's no software that I would know off besides XTU that would give this error while submitting. If you want you can pass me the screenshot and FM link and I can try to sub it for you

Small update on the Unigine stage:

thx to user Gt403cyl it became apparent that Unigine's website does not support multiple GPU configurations. 

This means if you submit the score to their website the verification link afterwards will not work (404 error)

Therefore we will remove the verification link for this competition. The request was forwarded that their leaderboard would support multiple GPU configurations in the future.

KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability.

Version 1.2 required for future subs gents

hope next time no update during the comp... it's a non-sense

1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:

KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability.

Version 1.2 required for future subs gents

 

This is making it difficult to sandbag scores you know

I still have version 1.3 by Benchmate up my sleeve... 

11 hours ago, superpatodonaldo said:

hope next time no update during the comp... it's a non-sense

If you found the glitches that caused the need for update you'd understand, pretty sure will need version 1.3 as there's a MAJOR flaw that wasn't patched in 1.2. Waiting on dev response but they reply quickly so perhaps it will be fixed. 

23 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

KRIEG Mathbench received another update for better score stability.

Version 1.2 required for future subs gents

 

Is there any chance that version 1.1 scores higher than 1.2 ?

or there is something wrong with my system ?

52 minutes ago, TASOS said:

Is there any chance that version 1.1 scores higher than 1.2 ?

or there is something wrong with my system ?

 

Personally I found it scored similar on my E8400 and 2600x 

I mean, if we don't know very well how it runs or if it's bugged and so on, we don't need it for a big comp like this ?

I personally think knowing how it calculates a score and knowing how the calculations are done would be great as well.

Patch notes would be icing on the top

I think that there need to be a time to mature/quarantine new hardware and new benchmarks before they are used in competitions/point giving challenges. like 2-3 months even if scores are posted on the bot.

For hardware.

Based on that some new ryzens have even been noticed to break even CPUz with wrong reporting.

Thus any new hardware need to be going through informal tests by users and experts on a number of benchers before they are confirmed. To for example update benchmate or other envelope.

For benchmarks.

Based on that its not fair to have updates in the middle of competition to have to re-run scores based on issues found.

Meanwhile cudos to the developers who keep correcting the issues found and for the guys who can actually find such issues ?

Mathbench was in beta for a long time, it was requested to be used.

Now some glitches were found with older hardware & affinity and directly fixed by the dev team. 
Aren't we slightly overreacting?  Like has your country already 4 LN2'ed scores done? 

With the development team immediately reacting/fixing I think this competition is ideal to get stuff sorted.

It has been configured by CPU socket, so if its an AM3 cpu it will count as an AM3 , unless there's some weird bug in the code (don't be surprised), other possible selection was mobo socket.

56 minutes ago, Digg_de said:

Germany not sure about Math Bench Stage.

AMD DDR2 optimal using is a AM2 Board + AM3 CPU and AM2+ Board + AM3 CPU for two Scores? Or has the CPU to be AM2 and AM2+ also Board?

Optimal list is something like 1090t, qx9650, x5470, and ??? 

Og phenom could be used but they kinda suck so may lose to qx9300 or socket F

19 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Mathbench was in beta for a long time, it was requested to be used.

Now some glitches were found with older hardware & affinity and directly fixed by the dev team. 
Aren't we slightly overreacting?  Like has your country already 4 LN2'ed scores done? 

With the development team immediately reacting/fixing I think this competition is ideal to get stuff sorted.

imo it could be used in an other comp, not a big one like CC or TC, but, I repeat, just my opinion

btw no problem, will improve it

1 hour ago, superpatodonaldo said:

imo it could be used in an other comp, not a big one like CC or TC, but, I repeat, just my opinion

There are other comps? ?

Stage 10 hyper pi 32 m

Is this per cpu socket?

Are we allowed to disable cores and hyperthreading?

Thanks in advance

13 minutes ago, ProKoN said:

Stage 10 hyper pi 32 m

 

Is this per cpu socket?

 

Are we allowed to disable cores and hyperthreading?

 

Thanks in advance

Rules say cannot disable core/ht, and is not cpu socket ranking 

3090 KP launched after Nov 1 and is banned correct? Want to make sure it gets confirmed publicly to save people time for PR, more of a reminder than a question tbh

Hi 
For royal port, lods are accepted?
thank you

8 minutes ago, Chaton22 said:

Hi 
For royal port, lods are accepted?
thank you

nope, the verification link needs to be VALID, so no LOD or other optimisations allowed as it wil not be valid at Futuremarkwebsite

4 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

non, le lien de vérification doit être VALIDE, donc pas de LOD ou d'autres optimisations autorisées car il ne sera pas valide sur Futuremarkwebsite

5 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

non, le lien de vérification doit être VALIDE, donc pas de LOD ou d'autres optimisations autorisées car il ne sera pas valide sur Futuremarkwebsite

6 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

nope, the verification link needs to be VALID, so no LOD or other optimisations allowed as it wil not be valid at Futuremarkwebsite

Ok thank you

What's the percentage of deviation from validation to screenshot on mem frequency Alby?

And is SPD tab required for screenshot?

we take 3% in general Scotty, CPUZ valid counts

No SPD tab required, but has to be readable in the CPUZ validation link

So, usual rules then. Thanks Alby, just wanted to check. 

On 10/23/2020 at 7:26 PM, yosarianilives said:

Why isent there the romanian flag in 2010 also? All other editions had it. Did history change?

@Leeghoofdthe Time Spy stage is currently a mess, in the design thread it was mentioned that Titans and all RTX cards would be banned but as configured, some RTX Super cards have been missed and some older Titans are allowed, e.g. RTX 2060 Super and Titan Xp. Can you close the gaps please?

I looked how they scored and they were in the score range of a 1080Ti around 10-11K... so they were not left out by oversight.

Hyperpi allows CPUs from the same socket, is that intentional? e.g. can sub something like 10900K + 9900KS + 9900KF + 9900K

yes HyperPi its defined by CPU type, not Socket type. Just ensure you run instances equal to either HT or physical cores (non HT CPUs)

• CPU ranking type

31 minutes ago, unityofsaints said:

@Leeghoofdthe Time Spy stage is currently a mess, in the design thread it was mentioned that Titans and all RTX cards would be banned but as configured, some RTX Super cards have been missed and some older Titans are allowed, e.g. RTX 2060 Super and Titan Xp. Can you close the gaps please?

You just mad cause US isn't doing bad lmao 

2 hours ago, yosarianilives said:

You just mad cause US isn't doing bad lmao 

Exactly...US ain't doing bad...with luck US has a bunch of great scores saved as well. I really hope there is a massive country effort where all good OC'rs pull together and make shit happen.

I know CC the last few years down here is more a social gathering then an OC'n event. So please bring the joy of a comeback victory worthy.

Is there a possibility to add rule like "No cores or HT disabling allowed" to HyperPi stage? Currently it just says "HyperPi Instances = processor/HT cores (max is 16 instances)", logically it's not clear that you may not disable cores or HT, it just says bench instances must be equal to core/HT number. Personally made this mistake, adding clarification probably will save time/effort for others

40 minutes ago, StingerYar said:

Is there a possibility to add rule like "No cores or HT disabling allowed" to HyperPi stage? Currently it just says "HyperPi Instances = processor/HT cores (max is 16 instances)", logically it's not clear that you may not disable cores or HT, it just says bench instances must be equal to core/HT number. Personally made this mistake, adding clarification probably will save time/effort for others

Easy way to ban lga 1200 without banning 1200 lmao

Is core Disabling allowed on the Math benchmark stage?

Also

Can we use lga 771 chips in 775 boards?

7 minutes ago, ProKoN said:

Is core Disabling allowed on the Math benchmark stage?

Why wouldn't it be? It is Ddr2 with what ever CPU you want.

Score averaging in the 4K stage is screwed, e.g. USA has a full set of subs averaging out to about 7 FPS but the stage shows 1.08 fps (I can't believe I'm helping mortal enemies ?)

29 minutes ago, unityofsaints said:

 (I can't believe I'm helping mortal enemies ?)

Its screwing everyone equally so not so bad a thing to want fixed lol, that is kinda an odd average though. Perhaps it's doing per core score but that doesn't seem to math out right either. 

Set it average hardware iso per effective core 

Didn't even know that there was an option to rank by "thread count", in old ranking 9700k would be op I think 

hyper pi 32m is calculated per core not total time?

skydiver is overall score or graphics score? subs are half and half lol

Crazy idea but are any tiebreaking mechanisms intended? Or are you happy with a shared win in that case?

13 hours ago, ProKoN said:

hyper pi 32m is calculated per core not total time?

 

skydiver is overall score or graphics score? subs are half and half lol

The hyperpi score that the bench spits out is an average of the times. Bench launches an instance of superpi on each thread. 

Skydiver should be graphics score

8 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Crazy idea but are any tiebreaking mechanisms intended? Or are you happy with a shared win in that case?

If there is a tie then the two teams select a champion to battle it out in ritual combat

18 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

If there is a tie then the two teams select a champion to battle it out in ritual combat

Doesn't sound COVID-safe

58 minutes ago, unityofsaints said:

Doesn't sound COVID-safe

The one who doesn't die of covid wins

I am unable to delete or edit my sub for sky diver. I posted overall score not graphics score

removed it ProKon...

shared points is nice for the end of year

 Thank you

Thanks for all the hard work that goes into setting these competitions up.

Okay to sub Sky Diver without valid veri link? Using latest version 3dmark and SI but still giving me graphics card not recognized after uploading score on 3dmark.com

4650G if that helps any. Can PM screen and link to verification if needed

1 hour ago, AKM said:

Okay to sub Sky Diver without valid veri link? Using latest version 3dmark and SI but still giving me graphics card not recognized after uploading score on 3dmark.com

4650G if that helps any. Can PM screen and link to verification if needed

Did you reach out to fm? 

superpatodonaldo`s 3DMark - Sky Diver (GPU) score: 6400 marks with a Radeon R7 Graphics (Spectre, 512 Shaders) (hwbot.org)

when I subbed it I was be able to see the fm link...now it seems to be hidden? and also I have issue to graphic detection

but notify my cpu has 2 core at low freq, so I benched just 2 instead of 4

@Leeghoofd please check if this work Generic VGA video card benchmark result - AMD A10-8750,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. F2A88XN-WIFI (3dmark.com)

Ill add it to the stage rules that only graphics driver not approved is acceptable. 

mail the FM screenshots to me plz I'll add them to the sub

@superpatodonaldo, nope still hidden, let's do the above

3 hours ago, superpatodonaldo said:

@Leeghoofd please check if this work Generic VGA video card benchmark result - AMD A10-8750,Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. F2A88XN-WIFI (3dmark.com)

It says generic vga card, if the hw is "unrecognized" then score will always be hidden to prevent leaks of es hw

UL/FM is actually pretty quick at adding hardware (at least in my experience with sample size of 1). I think it took them about 1.5 days before they added the i7-5775R, Pentium G5500, and Quadro P1000 to their database after submitting a support ticket.

Looks like the x265 stage has been configured back to a simple average score again?

Hey,

I've submitted a TimeSpy Score and an PCMark7 Score, but only TimeSpy rated.. the PCMark7 ist not rated (did two Benches and both submissions are not rated).
Did i something wrong or just a bug? If everything is ok, can it be scored?
https://hwbot.org/submission/4636007_therealkiwi_pcmark_7_ryzen_5_2600x_8430_marks
The score page is marked as "CountryCup 2020 - PCMark7 Score"

Thanks.

16 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Looks like the x265 stage has been configured back to a simple average score again?

Its supposed to be

5 hours ago, TheRealKiwi said:

Hey,

I've submitted a TimeSpy Score and an PCMark7 Score, but only TimeSpy rated.. the PCMark7 ist not rated (did two Benches and both submissions are not rated).
Did i something wrong or just a bug? If everything is ok, can it be scored?
https://hwbot.org/submission/4636007_therealkiwi_pcmark_7_ryzen_5_2600x_8430_marks
The score page is marked as "CountryCup 2020 - PCMark7 Score"

Thanks.

 

The ranking is by socket. Bullshooter already made an AM4 result which is better than yours. 

Look here for coordination of the german team:

https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/hwbot-country-cup-2020-nationaler-thread.1281202/

2 hours ago, Strunkenbold said:

The ranking is by socket. Bullshooter already made an AM4 result which is better than yours. 

Look here for coordination of the german team:

https://www.hardwareluxx.de/community/threads/hwbot-country-cup-2020-nationaler-thread.1281202/

Thank you very much.

we lost the mobile sub  when the desktop version was submitted. Do they count as the same thing?

https://hwbot.org/submission/4612931_prokon_3dmark___sky_diver_(gpu)_radeon_graphics_mobile_(renoir_448_shaders)_10687_marks

Nope,  I added your score back to the ranking a few hours ago

Good Competition! It was close Australia, nice play holding off subs till the last few hours.:)

Congrats to the winning team of Australia !!!

Congrats to them , cause they are committed to having fun !!!

Congrats to them , cause they are a true TEAM !!!

Congrats to them , cause they show what team spirit and national pride , really means !!!

A well deserved 4th in a row !!!

?

15 hours ago, TASOS said:

Congrats to the winning team of Australia !!!

Congrats to them , cause they are committed to having fun !!!

Congrats to them , cause they are a true TEAM !!!

Congrats to them , cause they show what team spirit and national pride , really means !!!

 

A well deserved 4th in a row !!!

?

 

 

 

nicely said tasos, but what you said is true , thats why they win, they bench as a team not individuals, thats the key