3 scores have been submitted using "Ati Radeon HD 4200". I Believe this is not a "socket integrated" GPU and is infact integrated into the motherboard chipset. Therefore the scores are invalid?

Also will sandy bridge be allowed to enter this category? Thanks.

Official background - yes

'socket integrated' is a wrong term. Of course it's just 'integrated', both in the chipset as the cpu.

Can you add the Nvidia GO 7400 to your list of integrated gpus as it's not letting me submit my laptop scores, nothing earth shattering but better than some

Or do you mean the gpu is not a seperate chip.?

http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/go7400.jpg

http://i775.photobucket.com/albums/yy31/monkyspanker/lappy.jpg

Yeah, 'integrated' means 'not separate chip'. So either on CPU or chipset.

7400GO is separate chip.

No problem, thanks for clearing that one up.

No one is going to use the latest technology?

Great rezults from all nations!

Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores

Also I'm interested in the tweaks for such high GT1 (359.5fps) in the 13779 GMA HD 2000 score. We tested the same or even better settings and never got over 330 - 335fps...

Matose may be it is high clock for CPU

Multi was set for turbo from bios. Not many tweaks used just good chip I guess. Also if you use 2150 Mhz works better than 2151-2199. Only 2000,2050,2100,2200 Mhz core works good and anything else does not. Not to forget when you use i7 2600 you get higher multies for turbo

Congrats winners! Tell me please, how work 37 multiplayer with 4 cores? I can only 35 with 4 cores

It's the Turbo Boost... with little or no load, the Mobo was changing the multi as it pleased... I started SuperPI to make the CPU up it's MHz, but couldn't get a shot @3752, to show the benching freq., so I left it at 3966.... and that's why I entered 3966... it doesn't matter for the result itself...

Turbo enabled.

Default - 34.

For 4 cores - 35

For 3 cores - 36

For 2 cores - 37

For 1 cores - 38

Matose may be it is high clock for CPU

I think the difference is too big to be just the CPU frequency

Need wait moderators opinion.

del

So... you can't do such result, so you just remove it??? Really? That's really lame... it's like some people/nations just can't loose... I know, that XristoC has back up results with the same high GT1, so it's not a fluke...

No comment...

Well... my result has been removed. Can I know why this is so? If you do not believe to the screen shot - I can supply more, with similar results (although a bit lower - of course I have submitted only my best run). If you need verification of consistency - I can bench again and I will probably achieve very close performance in every test. I really feel this is not fair and if you punish me for a bug in the 3DMark03 - why didn't you punish the Russian team (whose work I really admire and, in fact, I am glad they got the first place which they deffinitely deserved) in Stage 2?!

Changed the IGP of this submission: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2107068_

First article stated all Core i7 2xxx series have the HD3000 on board; another article stated it's only the K-sku that has the 3000. So, changed it back -sigh-/

Only the "K"-s got the HD3000.... everything else got HD2000...

So i think, that his result is OK.... or?

Yes. If only Intel would be able to use their "insane processing" technology to build a useful website where I can find that information ...

So i think, that his result is OK.... or?

Yep. Already changed it in the database. I'm now waiting for the engine to stop being stubborn and change the overall result.