Submission Details
espo_sun的SuperPi - 32M成绩
- 极限联盟
5min 40sec 50ms 和 AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 在 5000.2MHz
排名位置
n/a
全球排名
16th
Ryzen 7 5800X 排名:
Points earned for overclocker league
-
全球分数(UGP)
Not espo_sun's best submission
0.0 积分
-
硬件分数(UHP)
16th 使用 Ryzen 7 5800X
34.8 积分
Points earned for team league
-
全球战队能量分 (GTPP) Not Team03s's best submission
0.0 积分
-
硬件战队能量分(HTPP) 9th 战队使用Ryzen 7 5800X
7.6 积分
硬件细节
CPU细节
- 型号： AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 'Vermeer'
- 散热: Water (Custom)
- Cores: 5,000.25MHz(+31.59%)
-
内存细节
- 产品: Hall of Fame
- 类别 16384MB DDR4 SDRAM
- 速度：: @ 3,800MHz
- 计时： CL11.0 11-9-21
显卡细节
- 型号： GeForce GT 1030 (GDDR5) (GP108) NVIDIA
- 散热: Air (Stock)
- 速度：: 1,227MHz / 1,502MHz ()
-
主板细节
- 厂商: ASUS
- 型号： ROG Crosshair VIII Impact
- 芯片组： X570
-
近期的评论
Sorry, but I don't think this score is eligible for the competition.
The bclk is clearly altered. The version of BenchMate used is not showing Max Effective Clock for some reason.
If you load Windows at e.g. 100MHz bclk, open BenchMate and then increase bclk, the "Max Core Frequency" does not pick up this, but "Max Effective Clock" does. FCLK, UCLK and MCLK are read from SMU power table and they are always reported on 100MHz-base, regardless of blck set in bios or in Windows. CPUZ clearly shows the increased bclk, also one of the timers is skewed.
I have made a similar test on whatever Windows install I had on the SSD and got 2nd place easily with a single run.
Boot bclk is 100.0625, then increased to 100.63 in Windows.
请登录或注册后才能评论