Submission Details
Le score de [S2DDHT]Diamond sur Cinebench - 2003 - Enthusiast League
795 cb avec AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) à 3002.9MHz
Position dans le classement
n/a
Global 2x CPU classement:
3rd
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) classement:
3rd sur un total de 10
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
Not [S2DDHT]Diamond's best submission
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
3rd utilisant Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo)
7.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not Enthusiasts of Russian Federation's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) 3rd en équipe utilisant Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo)
4.1 Points
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) 'Toledo'
- Refroidissement: Air (Custom)
- Cores: 3 002,88MHz(+50.14%)
Détails mémoire
- Manufacturer: CORSAIR
- Produit: XMS
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Type: 2048MB DDR SD-RAM
- Fréquence: @ 250MHz
- Chronomètres CL2.5 3-2-5 1T
Détails carte graphique
- Modèle: GeForce GTX 970 (GM204-400) NVIDIA
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Fréquence: 1 178MHz / 1 752MHz (Stock)
Détails carte mère
- Fabricant: ASUS
- Modèle: A8N-SLI Premium
- Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
- Chipset: nForce 4 SLI
-
Commentaires récents
TheRealKiwi dit :
Interesting to see that your A8N-SLI doesn't have a 1T bug? It seems to be very common that around 235/240+ FSB cannot run stably at 1T, like my board. Have you tried higher MemClocks? Maybe you can post Rev and Production Date of that Board or something? Thanks
Antinomy dit :
IIRC, there was a newer rev and Premium might be of the latter, that has this fixed.
Antinomy dit :
Yep, I've checked the FAQ for these boards, the Premium indeed has this bug fixed.
TheRealKiwi dit :
At first thank you!
I've the Premium too (Rev. 1.02, i think it was the only Rev?), see here my Sub https://hwbot.org/submission/4806465
The used RAM (Corsair with TCCD) can run 1T 250+ on Socket A (462) A7N8X Deluxe (Rev 2), but not on this board, i would hope the fault is about my CPU, not the Board.
My CPU-Z -> Chipset says "K8 Bridge [Rev 00]"
Diamond's CPU-Z -> Chipset says "nForce4 [Rev A3]"
Is there something to know or because other CPU-Z version?
My CPU Batch is CCBWE 0541XPMW, so i think this is a very early Toledo, does anyone have any information on whether there were improved mem controllers in 2006?
Diamond's Batch would be interesting.
As i read Toledo E6 should be better as Manchester E4
More infos about my Chip (2T testing):
- DualChannel above 290MHz Mem is very instable, with struggle i can hit 300 idle
- with one stick ~330-340Mhz idle is reachable
- max BusSpeed i testet in this combi was about 390MHz
I only have an 3700+ SanDiego for more tests.
Antinomy dit :
This one.
TheRealKiwi dit :
OMG after an half year of dont touch that board i found my false: - Corsair 3200XL (TCCD) seems to not want to run 1T over 215-220MHz on A64 - Corsair 3200XLPro (TCCD) easy run 265MHZ 1T SuperPi stable i tested it on two 939 Boards with two different chipsets and different CPUs. the worse kit can run higher 1T clocks on other platforms to, eg. 754, dont know how but im happy with that :)
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter