Submission Details

avatar

- Enthusiast League

795 cb avec AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) à 3002.9MHz

Position dans le classement

n/a

Global 2x CPU classement:

3rd

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Toledo) classement:

Cup Bronze 3rd sur un total de 10

Points earned for overclocker league

Points earned for team league

Gallerie photos

Captures d'écran
Cinebench - 2003 screenshot
screenshot

Détails matériel

Détails Processeur

Détails mémoire

  • Manufacturer: CORSAIR
  • Produit: XMS
  • Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
  • Type: 2048MB DDR SD-RAM
  • Fréquence: @ 250MHz
  • Chronomètres CL2.5 3-2-5 1T
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte graphique

  • Modèle: GeForce GTX 970 (GM204-400) NVIDIA
  • Refroidissement: Air (Stock)
  • Fréquence: 1 178MHz / 1 752MHz (Stock)
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte mère

Détails disque

Détails alimentation

  • Fabricant: CORSAIR
  • Alimentation: 650 Watt

Commentaires récents

GermanyTheRealKiwi dit :

Interesting to see that your A8N-SLI doesn't have a 1T bug? It seems to be very common that around 235/240+ FSB cannot run stably at 1T, like my board. Have you tried higher MemClocks? Maybe you can post Rev and Production Date of that Board or something? Thanks

Russian FederationAntinomy dit :

On 9/8/2021 at 1:49 AM, TheRealKiwi said:

It seems to be very common that around 235/240+ FSB cannot run stably at 1T, like my board.

IIRC, there was a newer rev and Premium might be of the latter, that has this fixed.

Russian FederationAntinomy dit :

On 9/8/2021 at 1:49 AM, TheRealKiwi said:

Interesting to see that your A8N-SLI doesn't have a 1T bug?

Yep, I've checked the FAQ for these boards, the Premium indeed has this bug fixed.

GermanyTheRealKiwi dit :

At first thank you!
I've the Premium too (Rev. 1.02, i think it was the only Rev?), see here my Sub https://hwbot.org/submission/4806465
The used RAM (Corsair with TCCD) can run 1T 250+ on Socket A (462) A7N8X Deluxe (Rev 2), but not on this board, i would hope the fault is about my CPU, not the Board.

My CPU-Z -> Chipset says "K8 Bridge [Rev 00]"
Diamond's CPU-Z -> Chipset says "nForce4 [Rev A3]"
Is there something to know or because other CPU-Z version?

My CPU Batch is CCBWE 0541XPMW, so i think this is a very early Toledo, does anyone have any information on whether there were improved mem controllers in 2006?
Diamond's Batch would be interesting.
As i read Toledo E6 should be better as Manchester E4
More infos about my Chip (2T testing):
- DualChannel above 290MHz Mem is very instable, with struggle i can hit 300 idle
- with one stick ~330-340Mhz idle is reachable
- max BusSpeed i testet in this combi was about 390MHz

I only have an 3700+ SanDiego for more tests.

Russian FederationAntinomy dit :

6 minutes ago, TheRealKiwi said:

or because other CPU-Z version?

This one.

GermanyTheRealKiwi dit :

OMG after an half year of dont touch that board i found my false: - Corsair 3200XL (TCCD) seems to not want to run 1T over 215-220MHz on A64 - Corsair 3200XLPro (TCCD) easy run 265MHZ 1T SuperPi stable i tested it on two 939 Boards with two different chipsets and different CPUs. the worse kit can run higher 1T clocks on other platforms to, eg. 754, dont know how but im happy with that :)

Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter