Submission Details
I.nfraR.ed`s MaxxMem score - Extreme League
710.8 marks with DDR SD-RAM at 277MHz
Ranking position
n/a
Global rank:
11th
DDR SD-RAM rank:
11th out of 154
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Global Points
Not I.nfraR.ed's best submission
-
Hardware Points
11th using DDR SD-RAM
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not XTREME OC Team Bulgaria 's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 11th in team using DDR SD-RAM
0.0 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Venice) 'Venice'
- Cooling: Water (Custom)
- Cores: 3,047MHz(+26.96%)
Memory details
- Cooling: Air (Custom)
- Type: 512MB DDR SD-RAM
- Speed: @ 277MHz
- Timings: CL2.0 2-2-5 1T
VGA details
- Speed: MHz / MHz (Stock)
Mainboard details
- Manufacturer: DFI
- Model: LANParty UT nF4 Ultra-D
- Cooling: Air (Stock)
- Chipset: nForce 4 Ultra
-
Recent Comments
I.nfraR.ed commented on his own score:
How are we supposed to compete with older scores done with v1.82? Are we allowed to use older version of maxxmem? Rules say "no".
Mr.Scott says:
Current version is actually 2.01.
Strunkenbold says:
IMO db should be cleared with those old versions. If I remember correctly, there was some discussion about incorrect/cheated results.
I.nfraR.ed says:
Most of the guys with old scores have absolutely no fault.
I've updated my score and with old version I get 790 vs 710 with same settings and timings.
Strunkenbold says:
Thats true, but this is same situation like we had with wprime. Old versions had a major performance advantage. You cant beat those scores even with better clocks. Dont know what would be a fair solution but as maxxmem doesnt receive any points anyway I would say let them disappear...
Luebke says:
maybe put the old results in an own section "maxxmem - old" and close it?
TASOS says:
A moderator should do a split thread , so we can discuss freely about maxmem.
TaPaKaH says:
I don't think that the score split/blocking is worth the effort unless we can somehow guarantee that current/future versions will be consistent.
I.nfraR.ed says:
I don't think it's necessary. Leave it this way. I'm fine with it as long as we all use the latest version for the competition. I don't even run this bench and I wouldn't if it wasn't the competition .
Stelaras says:
Can you please run with v2.01 (like kotori's run) at these clocks again ? I'm curious to check something .
Thanks man and congratulations for your score !
I.nfraR.ed says:
I have ran it and the score is about the same. I think his score is bugged
What are you getting with similar clocks?
Bypass max is wrong here, but everything else is tight enough
Edit: btw, expert and venus should be more efficient than ultra-d/sli-d, but I don't think the difference in read and write could be that huge.
Stelaras says:
Honestly mate , i havent made any runs at 260Mhz+ , except some very quick testing at 240-250 just to check the OS and the differences between the versions of this benchmark.
I have both expert and ultra-d , so i'll do my best to test them .
As for my opinion , kotori's run doesn't seem bugged to me ... but the pattern seems to match with my test runs(done with the expert board at lower clocks as i wrote before)
I.nfraR.ed says:
Hmm, ok. So I will try with Expert, although my board can't clock BH5 very high for some reason.
I get sometimes similar read and write, but I thought it is bugged
Please log in or register to comment.