Submission Details
Le score de Massman sur 3DMark2001 SE - Elite League
123740 marks avec ATi Radeon HD 4890 à 1150/1125MHz
Position dans le classement
n/a
Global 1x GPU classement:
49th
Radeon HD 4890 classement:
49th sur un total de 285
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
Not Massman's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
49th utilisant Radeon HD 4890
31.2 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not Madshrimps Belgium OC Team's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) Not Madshrimps Belgium OC Team's best Radeon HD 4890 submission
0.0 Points
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: Intel Core i7 2600K 'Sandy Bridge'
- Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 5 710MHz(+67.94%)
-
Détails mémoire
- Manufacturer: G.SKILL
- Produit: Flare
- Refroidissement: Air (Custom)
- Type: 4096MB DDR3 SDRAM
- Fréquence: @ 1 108MHz
- Chronomètres CL6.0 9-6-39
-
Détails carte graphique
- Modèle: ASUS Radeon HD 4890 (RV790) ATi
- Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
- Fréquence: 1 150MHz (+35.29%) / 1 125MHz (+25.00%)
-
Détails carte mère
- Fabricant: GIGABYTE
- Modèle: GA-P67A-UD7
- Chipset: P67
-
Commentaires récents
Massman a commenté son propre score:
Good CH run (first run I complete with good CH). Nature, DH and LH 'okay', other's a bit low. 124k possible with this setup - maybe for later.
Eeky NoX dit :
Nice run Massman Good chip btw
TaPaKaH dit :
would be interesting CF with these cards, even with nature at 1600-1700fps
Iron dit :
Nice run Pieter, but I think Nature is a bit slow... when I did the 3dm01 run with the 4870@1,110GHz gpu, I was at 1128fps... so probably here is the UD7 that limits the score, given that you have 200mhz more for the cpu and 40mhz more for the gpu.
Can't you try this setup with an UD4 or UD5?
I think you should get around 125K just by changing the mobo.
Eeky NoX dit :
Agree with you about that board. I have strange scores with it, especially 03
TaPaKaH dit :
could be because of the fact that 4890 is slightly slower than 4870 at same clocks
Iron dit :
Didn't know that, Sam. I didn't do a comparative run, but this Monday we're going to do a run with our 4890, we'll try to use same frequencies, so we could quantify the "delta" between 4870 and 4890
Dinos22 dit :
Not far from 124K go go go
Hondacity dit :
why later? lol procastinator!
k3vst3r dit :
Nice work good chip
Massman dit :
Hm. In your 124k run?
[hwbot=2163352]submission[/hwbot]
You're at 5850MHz with the CPU. I've only got 5710MHz, which makes quite a difference even in Nature. That being said, I did have this run on the UD4:
[hwbot=2099979]submission[/hwbot]
1100FPS with only 1000 core. Not sure if it was part of the tweaking, but ever since I started working with the UD7, I felt nature was a tad slow.
k|ngp|n dit :
"Nature, DH and LH 'okay' " ....Define ok my man
Not bad!
Iron dit :
Nono Pieter, I was referring to this one, the last with the 4870 at high freqs and with a non-alien cpu
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/2159077_aoc_3dmark2001_se_radeon_hd_4870_120408_marks
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter