|Cinebench - R11.5||Ryzen 5 1500X||3867.2 MHz||claym0re_edge||858 points||218.7 pts||2 0|
|XTU||Core i3 7350K||6625 MHz||xMec||1205 marks||72.0 pts||2 4|
|GPUPI - 1B||GeForce GTX 1080 Ti||2746/1350 MHz||bob(nz)||8sec 362ms||48.2 pts||0 0|
|3DMark - Time Spy||GeForce GTX 1080 Ti||2570/1570 MHz||OGS||11758 marks||47.9 pts||0 0|
|3DMark - Time Spy||GeForce GTX 1080 Ti||2455/1551 MHz||Bullshooter||11616 marks||46.9 pts||2 1|
|XTU||Core i9 7920X||4590 MHz||Stijvan||3702 marks||41.8 pts||0 0|
|wPrime - 1024m||Core i3 7350K||6640 MHz||xMec||3min 9sec 406ms||34.9 pts||1 1|
|HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 1080p||Core i3 7350K||6329 MHz||Sandalo||27.16 fps||31.0 pts||0 1|
|HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k||Core i3 7350K||6329 MHz||Sandalo||6.28 fps||27.2 pts||0 0|
|XTU||Core i3 4005U||1700 MHz||mahmood_beklari||233 marks||26.6 pts||0 0|
Click on the competition images to go straight to the competition page, or click here for a more detailed overview at HWBOT.
World Tour 2017 and HWBOT X
Road to Pro 2017
We return for our next episode of the GPU Flashback Archive with another classic graphics platform from NVIDIA, the GeForce2 series. It was unleashed on the scene in early 2000 and proved conclusively that NVIDIA had become the number one graphics company on the planet. Let’s take a look at the GeForce2 series as a whole, the cards that were popular at the time and of course a few of the scores that have been submitted to the HWBOT database using GeForce2 cards.
With the launch of the NVIDIA GeForce 256 card series in late 1999, the company had truly announced its presence on the graphics card market. Competing cards from ATI, S3, Matrox and 3dfx could not compete with the GeForce 256 DDR. Based on the NV10 GPU, it was the first to offer a hardware solution for T&L (Transform and Lighting) tasks, offer fastest ever vertex shading and probably the best gaming experience that anyone could imagine. NVIDIA stayed true to their core company identity and continued to follow a pretty aggressive product launch cadence. The GeForce brand was expanded to include the GeForce2 series just six months later, in sharp contrast to the release schedule the company keeps today.
Our GPU Flashback Archive series continues today with what can only be described as a pivotal moment in GPU history. The NVIDIA NV10 was in fact the first chip to be called a GPU, a term coined by NVIDIA themselves back in 1999. Let’s take a look at the chip itself and the two cards that were produced using it, plus a few of the more notable score submissions that have been made using first ever generation of NVIDIA GeForce branded cards.
The NVIDIA RIVA series put the company firmly on the graphics card map, proving that the silicon they were producing could compete with offerings from other companies. It’s important to remember also that at the end of the nineties, you could purchase a card from one of several companies including ATI, S3, Matrox and Voodoo. NVIDIA as we all know would go on to become leader of the GPU market and one of the most successful companies in the industry. The direction taken with the first GeForce-branded GPUs, the GeForce 256, reflects NVIDIA’s bold and ambitious approach as a company generally. The GeForce 256 was unique, offloading geometric calculations to a specific engine while also increasing the amount of fixed pixel pipelines. The outcome was the first Direct3D 7-compliant card, one that offered a genuine leap in 3D gaming performance.
Having exhausted most of history’s CPU platforms and motherboards, this week we are launching a new series of historical articles that focus on Graphics Cards, GPUs and 3D benching. The series kicks off with arguably the first successful, commercial GPUs from industry leader Nvidia, the Nvidia RIVA series. Join us as we take a look at the technologies that arrived with the RIVA series of graphics cards, the most popular cards that have been used by overclockers on HWBOT and also a few of the more notable score submissions that have been made using Nvidia RIVA cards.
The Nvidia RIVA 128 graphics chip (codenamed the NV3) was the first version of the RIVA GPU series. It arrived on the scene in April of 1997 and was arguably the company’s first ever commercially successful graphics processing unit. The RIVA 128 was actually a departure from the very first Nvidia GPU series, the ST-G-2000 (NV1) being the first GPU on the market from Nvidia that could manage both 2D and 3D video acceleration. Unlike its predecessor the Nvidia RIVA was designed specifically to accelerate rendering of Direct3D 5.0 and OpenGL 1.0 API workloads.
The RIVA 128 was fabricated on the 350nm manufacturing process, supported both PCI and AGP 2x interfaces and arrived with the GPU clocked at 100MHz with 4MB of SGRAM (Synchronous graphics RAM) also clocked at 100MHz with a memory bus width of 128-bits. Cards based on the RIVA 128 GPU were able to rival equivalent offerings from industry leader Voodoo.
The final article in our Motherboard Memory Lane series brings us right up to date with a look at the current AMD AM4 platform. AM4 series motherboards support AMD Zen architecture CPUs, a new platform which AMD hoped would finally elevate the company back into the upper-mainstream PC component ecosystem, a place that had been utterly dominated by Intel for most of the last decade. The platform arrived with a new socket, new chipset series, new AMD Ryzen CPUs and a newly invigorated sense of purpose. Let’s take a look at the key platform features, the motherboards that are currently most popular and the CPUs that are being used to make some very decent scores on the HWBOT database.
The first systems to use the AMD AM4 Socket were in fact built by OEMs HP and Lenovo in late 2016 who were given exclusive access to the new platform. It arrived with Bristol Ridge-based APUs that featured Excavator cores, the last iteration of AMD’s Bulldozer CPU architecture. As far as the mainstream DIY PC consumer and enthusiast space, it barely registered a blip on the radar. We were all far too preoccupied with waiting for Zen to arrive.
We continue our Motherboard Memory Lane series today with a look at the AMD FM2+ platform, the follow up to the FM2 Socket and its Trinity-based APUs that we considered in last week’s article. Socket FM2+ represents AMD’s third attempt to trying to gain traction in the budget to mid-range desktop PC segment, arriving with a refreshed series of Kaveri-based APUs and an updated FCH (or chipset if you prefer). Let’s push on and take a look at the new platform, the motherboards that were popular in this era and some of the more impressive scores that were submitted to HWBOT.
Where Intel had managed to maintain to a ‘tick-tock’ cadence with its processor launches, AMD enjoyed an odd dance all of its own. The first AMD Accelerated Processor Units (APUs) debuted with FM1 in mid-2011 and featured Llano architecture chips. Then FM2 came along in October 2012 with and Trinity and subsequent Richland architecture APUs which were eventually followed by updated Kabini models on mobile platforms only. FM2+ launched in January 2014 with Kaveri, seeing AMD having one last roll of the dice before the new AM4 socket and the eagerly anticipated Zen architecture made its bow on center stage.
The latest edition of the Overclocker magazine is now available with issue #42 honing in on several hardware products that are designed specifically with overclocking in mind. Issue #42 includes hardware reviews of the GIGABYTE X299 SOC Champion motherboard, AMD Ryzen Threadripper, which is tested alongside the ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme board. Plus there’s a look at the Corsair ONE rig and the GALAX OC LAB Edition GTX 1080 Ti card.
Perhaps more poignant than any of that however, is the Editorial piece from Editor in Chief Neo Sibeko in which he basically reveals that Issue #42, may well be his last:
Here it is, Issue 42 of TheOverclocker Magazine. I’d go on about some half relevant aspect of the industry or whatever, or talk about what I believe to be “exciting”. I may still do that, but first I need to give you all a heads up, that this may possibly be the last issue of TheOverclocker Magazine.
Can’t confirm that at present, but what I’m saying is don’t be surprised if there is never another issue after this one. If there is great, but if not, consider this a goodbye and good luck. There’s nothing more to write about it really, you have been warned. It’s been a good ride, but it’s at a point where I or the publication itself needs a change. It’s been crazy to say the least, running and pushing out the magazine time and time again at random intervals. No need to recall all of that as the old issues are still available. From the boring and uninspired ones to the good ones, they all had a story, challenges and joys.
With all that said, if you’ll see Issue 43 or not, I can’t say. I’d hope you’re able to, but if not, this is thanking you for all the support, readers, emails etc. They were appreciated and will continue to be.
I sincerely hope that Neo opts to continue The Overclocker magazine. His hard work and dedication to producing a quality OC-focused publication has been thoroughly appreciated by this particular reader. For now at least, you can go ahead and savor Issue #42 of The Overclocker Magazine here on Joomag.
This Thursday we take a trip back in time to a day in September 2011 when the overclocking and PC enthusiast community was eagerly awaiting AMD’s brand new Bulldozer architecture processors. Prior to launch only a handful of overclockers had actually managed to get their hands on the new AMD silicon, one of which was Finland’s Sami 'macci' Mäkinen who was actually involved with the launch itself. NordicHardware were fortunate to get an interview with macci in which they managed to confirm several details about Bulldozer specifically related to its overclocking potential.
NordicHardware: "Why don't your CPU's have a coldbug, and will all Bulldozer-samples come without it or does this only apply to handpicked samples?"
Sami Mäkinen: : "I’d need to clarify this from AMD Engineering teams (and not sure if they’d be able to provide much detail to be honest…). But in short (and this is just a personal guess) it likely has to do with the design margins and similar to the Deneb and Thuban CPUs the design appears to be very robust and can withstand even the most extreme cooling solutions. Bulldozer is a very descriptive name in this case.So far I have not seen a sample that would not run under LN2 – so it looks very promising! I have tested around 10 CPUs so far under LN2."
NordicHardware: : "What kind of voltage did you need to reach your 8.429 GHz result, and how many watts this the system pull?"
Sami Mäkinen: : "The sweet spot under LHe cooling and for the CPUZ workload was 2.0125V (CPUZ reported 2.016V). We did not measure the current going to the CPU rail but as usual the CPU power consumption drops dramatically when you move to very low temperatures. For this test the goal was to find out the max. CPUZ result so we didn’t need to load the system heavily. If I’d have to make a guess I’d say we probably stayed within the TDP".
You can catch the full interview with Sami from September 2011here on Nordic Hardware.
Just like every month we have a look at the SuperPI 32M low-clock challenge threads in our forum and make a list of the most efficient overclocks for various CPU architectures. It's been a while since we posted the last update on the most efficient results as things have been quiet on the SuperPI front this summer. Compared to last month we see an improvement in the Skylake-X category which is now led by Teracon from Germany.
Check out the full table below. For more information and efficient SuperPI 32M overclocking results, check out the low-clock threads in our Overclocking and Tweaking sub-forum and the SuperPI 32M Low Clock - Fastest Per Architecture forum thread.
Congratulations to all the leaders in their specific categories!
SuperPI 32M Intel 5 GHz Challenge Leaderboard (September 21, 2017)
|Skylake-X||6 min 19.285 sec||Teracon||Core i7 7820X||DDR4-3654 C14-14-14-28||MSI X299 XPower Gaming AC|
|Kaby Lake||5 min 52.890 sec||Coolhandluke41||Core i7 7700K||GALAX Hall of Fame DDR4-4083 C12-11-11-28|
|Skylake||5 min 52.750 sec||Luumi||Core i7 6700K||G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4-4138 C12-11-11-28||ASRock Z170M OC Formula|
|Broadwell-E||6 min 2.250 sec||Dancop||Core i7 6950X||G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4-3591 C11-11-11-18||ASUS Rampage V Edition 10|
|Broadwell||6 min 14.625 sec||Splave||Core i7 5775C||Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2000 C7-7-7-21||ASRock Z97 OC Formula|
|Haswell-E||5 min 55.328 sec||Dancop||Core i7 5960X||G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4-3333 C10-11-11-28||ASUS Rampage V Extreme|
|Haswell||5 min 54.391 sec||Dancop||Core i7 4770K||G.SKILL PI DDR3-2820 C5-9-6-24||ASUS Maximus VII Impact|
|Ivy Bridge||6 min 14.109 sec||Splave||Core i7 3770K||DDR3-2710 C7-9-6-18||ASRock Z77 OC Formula|
|Sandy Bridge||6 min 30.219 sec||Perica_barii||Core i7 2600K||Corsair Dominator GTX2 DDR3-2174 C6-7-5-20||ASUS Maximus IV GENE-Z/Gen3|
|Gulftown||7 min 5.297 sec||Gazza30||Core i7 980X||Kingston DDR3-2000 C7-7-6-20||GIGABYTE X58A-UD7|
|Bloomfield||7 min 8.020 sec||Dsjjang||Core i7 920||DDR3-1898 C6-7-6-19||ASUS P6T WS Professional|
SuperPI 32M AMD 5 GHz Challenge Leaderboard (September 21, 2017)
|Summit Ridge||7 min 5.101 sec||Johan45||Ryzen 7 1700X||G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4-2940 C12-12-12-22||ASUS Crosshair VI Hero|
|Carrizo||9 min 35.781 sec||Newlife||Athlon X4 845||Patriot Viper II Sector 7 DDR3-2064 C6-10-6-22||GIGABYTE F2A88X-UP4|
|Kaveri||12 min 17.437 sec||Zeropluszero||A10-7850K||DDR3-2400 MHz C8-11-9-18||GIGABYTE F2A88XN-Wifi|
|Vishera||14 min 9.391 sec||Robbo2||FX-8350||G.SKILL PI DDR3-2600 C8-11-8-24||ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z|
|Richland||14 min 9.156 sec||Newlife||A6-6420K||G.SKILL TridentX DDR3-2368 C7-10-10-8||GIGABYTE F2A88XN-Wifi|
|Trinity||14 min 11.016 sec||Dinos22||A10-5800K||Corsair Dominator DDR3-2666 C9-12-12-24||GIGABYTE F2A85X-UP4|
|Zambezi||15 min 16.953 sec||Splave||FX-4200||Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2234 C7-8-8-18||ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0|
|Llano||14 min 3.188 sec||D3mox||A8-3870K||G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3-2112 C7-10-7-24||GIGABYTE A75-UD4H|
|Kabini||16 min 39.016 sec||Wizerty||Athlon 5350||G.SKILL PI DDR3-2026 C7-9-6-24||ASUS AM1I-A|
|Thuban||13 min 42.953 sec||Bones||Phenom II X6 1100T BE||G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3-1944 C7-9-7-24||ASUS Crosshair V Formula|
|Deneb||13 min 24.078 sec||I.nfraR.ed||Phenom II X4 965 BE||Corsair Dominator GTX2 DDR3-1846 C6-6-6-18||GIGABYTE 970A-UD3|
A few weeks ago Germany’s renowned overclocking guru der8auer caused quite a stir on the interweb by categorically stating that the X299 motherboards that he had so far tested were not offering sufficient VRM cooling to handle the needs of Intel’s new Core-X processors when overclocked. The web exploded with every tech blogger, YouTuber and his mother chipping in with an option or ten. While there remain disagrements on the topic of testing philosophies and other details, it is true that these new Core-X chips do produce a great deal of heat when pushed beyond stock. There's also a case that perhaps current motherboard designs could do more to help dissipate heat from the VRM area of the board to help reduce CPU throttling under load.
So what is the best way to keep your shiny new Intel Core-X CPU sufficiently cooled? A question that takes center stage in der8auer’s latest video. He sought to explore the area of custom water cooling, and whether or not a water cooled CPU could offer fully stable, non-throttling performance under load. To do this he decided to compare the results when using a regular water block with that of a monoblock. For comparison sake, he also added data from a regular air cooler.
The system he used was based on an MSI X299 GAMING Pro Carbon motherboard and a ten-core Intel Core i9-7900X processor. The water block he used was an EK Supremacy EVO, while the monoblock used was a EK-Monoblock, in this case the EK-FB RGB Monblock which uses nickel-plated electrolytic copper. He also upgraded the thermal pads of the motherboard’s VRM heatsinks, using Minus Pad 8 pads from Thermal Grizzly.
As you might expect the monoblock does indeed do a better job of the keeping the VRM components in in check regarding thermals. However, that doesn’t quite tell you the whole story. For that, you’d better skip over to the der8auer YouTube channel and watch the video for yourself.
The OC Show, Season 4 Episode 11 took place a few days ago and is now available on the OverClocking-TV YouTube channel. Atlas, Toolius, Buildzoid and Trouffman once again take on a broad range of overclocking-related topics in a pretty laid back and inform podcast.
As ever Toolius gets the show underway with an overview of the competitive overclocking that is taking place on the O-ESPORTS platform. Front and center we have the HWBOT Team Cup where things are hotting up nicely near the top of the table. We find Warp9-systems and Overclock.net vying for the win with just a handful of points separating the two. Overclock.net have the advantage for now, but how long will it last. The Road to Pro Challenger Divisions are also coming to a climax as well as the latest round of the Rookie Rumble. Plenty of action chew over as we move towards the end of September.
The topic then changes gears a little as the guys discuss the most recent HWBOT World Tour visits to Yogyakarta, Indonesia and Montreal, Canada. Trouff gives us an overview of the Montreal 2017 event which took place at DreamHack 2017, an event which saw thousands of gamers and enthusiasts attend the largest tech expo in the region. The event featured Ambient Overclocking Workshops that were free for all attendees. Take a 30 minute tutorial then sit down at a PC and try and score as highly as possible. The systems used for the workshops were all X299 platform systems with Core i9 7920X processors. Pretty nice rigs for Amateurs! Trouff also goes on to describe the Extreme Overclocking Workshops that were also hosted and the experience of getting folks up to speed with LN2 pouring, among other things.
There is also a discussion related to the Yogyakarta 2017 event which also took place a week or so ago. The highlight for many was the AOCT (Amateur Overclocking Tournament), arguably one of the best attended and most exciting amateur / ambient contests anywhere in the world. The event also featured the the OCWC Yogyakarta 2017 Qualifier contest which is where the region’s best extreme overclockers competed for a spot in the finals at the end of the year.
You can find episode 11 from Season 4 of the OC Show here on the OverClocking-TV YouTube channel.
Today we are delighted to bring you news of the ROG OC Showdown Edition Team Edition 2 contest. It's the highly anticipated sequel to the first ROG OC Showdown Edition Team Edition contest that took place on OC-ESPORTS earlier this year, and it starts in just a few days time. Once again ASUS invite teams of overclockers to compete across a broad variety to stages for some truly awesome prizes. Let’s take a look at the contest format, rules and prizes in a little more detail.
ROG OC Showdown Team Edition: September 22nd - November 6th 2017
The ROG OC Showdown Team Edition 2 contest is broken down into five individual stages. Each stage involves a specific benchmark, a specific number of scores that are required, restrictions on cooling and the different hardware needed. There are also restrictions about which of overclockers, from which HWBOT league may compete, these include Rookie, Novice, Apprentice, Enthusiast, Extreme and Elite leagues. The idea is to include challenges for all members of the team, from Rookie to Elite.
For an example, let’s look at Stage 1. Only Rookie or Novice overclockers may compete. Benching on Intel XTU, three different scores using three different quad-core processors are required. Cooling is restricted to air or water cooling (25°C at idle).
Thanks to sponsors ASUS and the Republic of Gamers, Seasonic, EK-WB and G.SKILL, many of the participants in the contest will walk away with some very impressive prizes. Check out the ROG OC Showdown Team Edition 2 contest page here on OC-ESPORTS. Get a team, and get pushing!
Read the full contest announcement here on OC-ESPORTS.
In the last few days we’ve seen a few press releases coming out from EK describing the latest waterblock offerings the company has developed that are compatible with the latest X299 platform motherboards from ASUS. EK now have compatible RGB monoblocks for four ASUS X299 motherboards including specially developed versions for the popular ROG Rampage Extreme and Apex boards.
[Press Release] - Designed and engineered in cooperation with ASUS, this monoblock uses award-winning EK-Supremacy EVO cooling engine to ensure best possible CPU cooling. This water block directly cools Intel LGA-2066 socket type CPU, as well as the power regulation (MOSFET) module. Liquid flows directly over all critical areas, providing the enthusiasts with a great solution for high and stable overclocks. Like with every EK monoblock, EK-FB ASUS PRIME X299 RGB features high flow design and this monoblock can be easily used with weaker and silent water pump settings as well. This kind of efficient VRM cooling on an X299 platform additionally brings down the CPU temperatures compared to the traditional CPU water block and stock VRM heatsink cooling solution.
This X299 platform based monoblock also comes with a new redesigned cold plate. The new design ensures that the monoblock has better mechanical contact with the IHS of Intel Core X-series LGA-2066 socket based processors, thus enabling better thermal transfer. The base of the monoblock is made of nickel-plated electrolytic copper while the top is made of quality acrylic glass material. The nickel plated brass screw-in standoffs are pre-installed and allow for easy installation.
The monoblock is equipped with a 4-pin RGB LED strip that connects to the motherboard's 4-pin LED header (if supported) or it can be connected to any other 4-pin LED controller. The LED strip cover can easily be removed for adjusting the cable orientation or replacing the LED strip with a custom solution as well!
EVGA has today launched their latest EPOWER board. Dubbed the EVGA ‘Untouchables’ EPOWER V, the board features the latest generation digital PWM ICs from International Rectifier, a 12-phase main output plus a 2-phase secondary output, a remote sense option for Vdroop compensation, integrated voltage monitoring via an LED display, onboard EVbot MKII controls for real-time voltage control, plus USB Type-C connectivity, dual 3-pin +12v fan header and 1 year guarantee. The EPOWER V board is available now for $249 USD.
The EVGA "Untouchables" EPOWER V card is a standalone VRM board that provides additional power for target devices, such as graphics cards or motherboards. The board is designed to provide two fully-independent voltage outputs, and features a built-in EVBot MKII to allow voltage control on the fly. Take your benching experience to the Very limits of your hardware's capability with the EVGA EPOWER V.
The EPOWER V board is powered by the three 6-pin PCI-E power connectors. The input is fed through a 12+2 phase design to provide substantially more VCORE and VMEM to your graphics card, allowing it to break through any limits holding it back.
VMEM - Voltage adjustment range 600mV to 2300mV. Rated capacity is 80A. Maximum peak capacity - 90A at 1.9V output voltage. VCORE - Voltage adjustment range is 600mV to 2000mV. Rated capacity is 600A. Maximum peak capacity - 620A at 1.85V output voltage.
You can find more details about the EVGA ‘Untouchables’ EPOWER V board here on the EVGA site. You can also check out this summary from TechPowerUp here.
France’s No.1 overclocker Wizerty was busy once again last weekend, spreading the word of extreme overclocking in his native Paris. Following up on an OC workshop event that took place at the Absolute PC store in Central Paris back in April, Jean-Michel teamed up again with the Absolute and partners Corsair, AMD ASUS ROG for another OC workshop extravaganza. You can check out some great photos of the event, posted on Wizerty’s Facebook page (credit to W4rell and Dominique).
Whereas the first event focused on showing folks how to push an Intel Kaby Lake platform under LN2, last weekend’s event was all about AMD Ryzen Threadripper. Alongside the presence the country’s number one overclocker, the new AMD HEDT platform also proved to be real draw. Indeed the event attracted the attention of so many local enthusiasts that Wizerty described it as an ‘absolutely HUGE turnout’!
The event is of course part of a broader effort to expose regular PC enthusiasts, DIY builders and gamers to the extreme overclocking experience. The workshop followed a pretty straight forward format; introduce the basic skill involved and then allow attendees to get hands on. If you check out the full photo album on Facebook, you’ll notice that among the late teens and early twenty year-olds, a few children also managed to get their first taste of LN2 fueled performance. Let's hope these young'uns get the OC bug.
You can find the full photo album of the Paris Threadripper workshop, here on the Wizerty Facebook page.
Threadripper has been around for a just over a month now, giving HEDT users a viable alternative to Intel’s current Broadwell-E and Core-X processors. AMD promised that the platform would arrive with a full eco-system of X399 compatible motherboards at launch an to be fair there were a few solid options out there on day one. Today there are plenty of options to look at when considering a X399 build, which is why Ian Cutress and Joe Shields of Anandtech have decided to examine seven of the board available on the market today:
With the release of AMD’s Threadripper CPUs into the HEDT market, board partners have released new motherboards based on the X399 chipset. Consumers are going to see quad channel memory, native 4-Way SLI and Crossfire capabilities, more full-speed M.2 slots, added 10G network ports, and more on the new platform. We're taking a quick look at each of the motherboards that the vendors are promoting in the market, as well as a few upcoming teasers.
The four major players, ASRock, ASUS, GIGABYTE, and MSI, have launched X399 motherboards for Threadripper. These boards equip the massive 4094-pin socket with eight DIMM slots to cover the four memory channels and then differentiate themselves in PCIe configuration, IO, styling and software support.
- -ASRock X399 Taichi
- -ASRock X399 Professional Gaming
- -ASUS X399 ROG Zenith Extreme
- -ASUS Prime X399-A
- -ASUS Strix X399-E Gaming
- -GIGABYTE X399-Gaming 7
- -MSI X399 Gaming Pro Carbon
You can find the Threadripper Motherboard preview article here on Anandtech. It’s a really good read if you want to better understand the different TR4 socket offerings on the market right now.