If this score is legit, this CPU is nuts.

1.185v for 5ghz XTU?

1.185v is real? The more important thing is this score possible with 5GHz & 3866 12-12-12?

The score is legit. The 1.185v is my board not displaying the correct vcore volts. I even posted the issue in the thread on the forum, for the board, but from the looks of it, it appears to be a faulty sensor on the board.

I don't want to ruin your fun,but this is a bugged run.Unless you know some secret tweak and/or magic memory combo,you will not score 1807 at 3866 C12 For example in Msi competition me and Xtreme Addict scored 1802 at 4080,4133 respectly after maybe hundreds of re-run.1807 is 2 step higher,i believe 1805 or even 1807 might be possible at 4220+ C12 but absolutely not at 3866 c12 and 4900 cache...

Could it be one of those magical Lucky Runs that out of nowhere scores 30-40 Points above normal?

Bug run!,

I wish I knew some secret tweak or magic combo, unfortunately I don't lol! All I did was overclock my cpu to 5ghz and set my memory timings, following the screenshots that are in the thread for my board, as a reference.

It then produced the score above. Looking at other similar scores that are at 5ghz, I don't see why everyone is saying my score is bugged.

If you look at the following scores, the first one is running at 5ghz and has their memory set at 3733 and got a score of 1800, yet he is running his memory slower than mine.

And in the second example, they get a score of 1797 and their memory speed is at 3600mhz, so going off those two examples, and considering my memory is at 3866, I don't see why a score of only 7-10 points higher is not possible.

Score 1800 : http://hwbot.org/submission/3305777_hilderman_xtu_core_i7_6700k_1800_marks

Score 1797 : http://hwbot.org/submission/3301715_stivut_xtu_core_i7_6700k_1797_marks

Is that win10 or 8/8.1 ,i cannot figure out. Also is it x64 or x32,this is the highest efficiency i saw so far.