Legend
This profile uses the same processor, at the same or lower speed, but has a higher XTU score. You might want to check out these profiles and try to apply it to your system.
The profile you have currently selected. Details are shown below the chart.
The profile you are analyzing. Settings of this profile are compared to the one you have selected.
Luumi`s Core i3 6320 at 4016MHz with an ASRock Z170 OC Formula motherboard - 49°C
Recent Comments
Luumi commented on his own score:
Haha. Happy new year guys :). Samsung B(ug) is the new king.
phill says:
Congrats Luumi!!
Doug2507 says:
MLG FTW! Smashed!
websmile says:
Bwahaha, I see 20 pissed guys crying over new year - great^^
DartMaul says:
Oops, you did it again!
says:
Phenomenal efforts, Luumi! Well done!
ObscureParadox@3XS says:
HE DOES IT!!!
Dancop says:
AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dhenzjhen says:
Anglin brothers Alcatraz escape, LOL!!! Congrats (y)
aerotracks says:
Nice one Luumi!
So contrary to popular belief, XTU doesn't have a 740 cap
TaPaKaH says:
B(ug)?
leeghoofd says:
nicest way to close a nice year.. congraz Luumi, Yellow board rules it on XTU
says:
Bug comes from the way they work, one time you find nice stable settings. Next time you turn on they dont even post.
kimandsally says:
Well done amazing job, top man.
phobosq says:
Good job, no CL12?
GtiJason says:
Awesome, looks like that 1 point is much harder to get than 100 using an i7. Luumi for King!
l0ud_sil3nc3 says:
I only tried B-Die with four dimms on big board and it seemed super consistent 740, but no go on dat point lol. Well done Lummi, try with little board tonight.
says:
Wish I had that board.
nickolp1974 says:
You did it! Top man Luumi! Gratz
coolhandluke41 says:
Great job Luumi !
der8auer says:
haha awesome work man Was really waiting for someone to beat 740
Alex@ro says:
Gj happy new year
keika says:
Amazing ! and happy new year to all
Hideo says:
L1.92 bios is None-K unlocked bios? And Bclock103MHz...Interesting!
Nice run!!
says:
Baseclock is 102.93 set, cpu-z just shows 103 sometimes.
amirhosein says:
Great job mate!
says:
Really Nice
kintaro says:
Great run!!!
Dinos22 says:
hahah pertty awesome dude!!!
Lays says:
What's really confusing is, when only 1 person had 742, 741 was still like 120 points. But now that 2 or 3 ppl have it, 60 points.
nickolp1974 says:
Of course its not fair but thats XTU! I'd rather see it removed altogether but thats never gonna happen, but hopefully PJ and the gang can sort it out with the new points system.
@Massman, do you know the percentage of people that will only use xtu a few times to test there system and not bench anything else, basically not adding anything to the hwbot community apart from boosting the scores unaturally for this particular benchmark.
Massman says:
This is because of the rule that equal score gives equal points. So if #1 to #7 has the same score, they all receive points of a #1 position. #8 then gets points like #8.
Straight from the R7 development thread: "we also added one more parameter in the algorithm design to determine the weight of a benchmark. In short, this parameter will allow us to arbitrarily limit points of certain benchmarks that are over valued. I'm looking at you, XTU." (source).
It's coming ... :celebration:
nickolp1974 says:
Cool, keep up the good work PJ and team
Lays says:
I wish it went off score instead of the position, like if 742 was first place score and 7 people had it, then 741 was second place and the 8th person had it they'd get second place points.
Please log in or register to comment.