Intel XTU: Analyze

Verify whether it`s working as expected!

avatar

Luumi`s Core i3 6320 at 4016MHz with an ASRock Z170 OC Formula motherboard - 49°C

This profile was made on a system which does not allow overclocking. Try to enabled overclocking related options in your BIOS, or use a different motherboard. Applying downloaded profiles may not work.

Sorry, we do not have enough data collected for a {0} yet. If you make a second analysis, we''ll be able to draw the chart properly!


avatar

Luumi`s Core i3 6320 at 4016MHz with an ASRock Z170 OC Formula motherboard - 49°C

  •  Like this
  • Recent Comments

    Luumi commented on his own score:

    Haha. Happy new year guys :). Samsung B(ug) is the new king.

    United Kingdomphill says:

    Congrats Luumi!!

    United KingdomDoug2507 says:

    MLG FTW! Smashed!

    websmile says:

    Bwahaha, I see 20 pissed guys crying over new year :P:D - great^^

    Russian FederationDartMaul says:

    Oops, you did it again!

    says:

    Phenomenal efforts, Luumi! Well done! :D

    ObscureParadox@3XS says:

    HE DOES IT!!!

    GermanyDancop says:

    AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Philippinesdhenzjhen says:

    Anglin brothers Alcatraz escape, LOL!!! Congrats (y)

    Germanyaerotracks says:

    Nice one Luumi!

    So contrary to popular belief, XTU doesn't have a 740 cap :D

    TaPaKaH says:

    B(ug)?

    Belgiumleeghoofd says:

    nicest way to close a nice year.. congraz Luumi, Yellow board rules it on XTU

    says:

    Bug comes from the way they work, one time you find nice stable settings. Next time you turn on they dont even post.

    United Kingdomkimandsally says:

    Well done amazing job, top man.

     

    Polandphobosq says:

    Good job, no CL12? :)

    United StatesGtiJason says:

    Awesome, looks like that 1 point is much harder to get than 100 using an i7. Luumi for King!

    United Statesl0ud_sil3nc3 says:

    I only tried B-Die with four dimms on big board and it seemed super consistent 740, but no go on dat point lol. Well done Lummi, try with little board tonight.

    says:

    Wish I had that board.

    United Kingdomnickolp1974 says:

    You did it! Top man Luumi! Gratz ;)

     

    3F90B28C-D355-4E9B-AE6B-800263F54818.png_zpsmi9nhuj1.jpeg

    United Statescoolhandluke41 says:

    Great job Luumi !

    Germanyder8auer says:

    haha awesome work man :D Was really waiting for someone to beat 740

    RomaniaAlex@ro says:

    Gj happy new year

    Japankeika says:

    Amazing ! and happy new year to all

    JapanHideo says:

    L1.92 bios is None-K unlocked bios? And Bclock103MHz...Interesting!

    Nice run!!

    says:

    Baseclock is 102.93 set, cpu-z just shows 103 sometimes.

    Iranamirhosein says:

    Great job mate!

    says:

    Really Nice

    Greecekintaro says:

    Great run!!!

    AustraliaDinos22 says:

    hahah pertty awesome dude!!!

    United StatesLays says:

    742 marks make 166 gpts,741 marks only makes 66.1 gpts.....Is thar a fair system pts for u guys??because for me is clearly NOT!!!

     

    What's really confusing is, when only 1 person had 742, 741 was still like 120 points. But now that 2 or 3 ppl have it, 60 points. :(

    United Kingdomnickolp1974 says:

    742 marks make 166 gpts,741 marks only makes 66.1 gpts.....Is thar a fair system pts for u guys??because for me is clearly NOT!!!

     

    Of course its not fair but thats XTU! I'd rather see it removed altogether but thats never gonna happen, but hopefully PJ and the gang can sort it out with the new points system.

     

    @Massman, do you know the percentage of people that will only use xtu a few times to test there system and not bench anything else, basically not adding anything to the hwbot community apart from boosting the scores unaturally for this particular benchmark.

    BelgiumMassman says:

    What's really confusing is, when only 1 person had 742, 741 was still like 120 points. But now that 2 or 3 ppl have it, 60 points. :(

     

    This is because of the rule that equal score gives equal points. So if #1 to #7 has the same score, they all receive points of a #1 position. #8 then gets points like #8.

     

    Of course its not fair but thats XTU! I'd rather see it removed altogether but thats never gonna happen, but hopefully PJ and the gang can sort it out with the new points system.

     

    @Massman, do you know the percentage of people that will only use xtu a few times to test there system and not bench anything else, basically not adding anything to the hwbot community apart from boosting the scores unaturally for this particular benchmark.

     

    Straight from the R7 development thread: "we also added one more parameter in the algorithm design to determine the weight of a benchmark. In short, this parameter will allow us to arbitrarily limit points of certain benchmarks that are over valued. I'm looking at you, XTU." (source).

     

    It's coming ... :celebration:

    United Kingdomnickolp1974 says:

    Cool, keep up the good work PJ and team ;)

    United StatesLays says:

    This is because of the rule that equal score gives equal points. So if #1 to #7 has the same score, they all receive points of a #1 position. #8 then gets points like #8.

     

     

     

    Straight from the R7 development thread: "we also added one more parameter in the algorithm design to determine the weight of a benchmark. In short, this parameter will allow us to arbitrarily limit points of certain benchmarks that are over valued. I'm looking at you, XTU." (source).

     

    It's coming ... :celebration:

     

    I wish it went off score instead of the position, like if 742 was first place score and 7 people had it, then 741 was second place and the 8th person had it they'd get second place points. :(

    Please log in or register to comment.