Submission Details
Sweet`s PCMark Vantage score - Extreme League
10357 marks with Intel Xeon W3520 at 4018MHz
Ranking position
n/a
Global 4x CPU rank:
14th
Xeon W3520 rank:
14th out of 18
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Global Points
Not Sweet's best submission
-
Hardware Points
14th using Xeon W3520
3.2 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not ocXtreme's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 9th in team using Xeon W3520
2.0 Points
Media gallery
- Verification URL, image, checksum
- http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=205217&resultType=18
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: Intel Xeon W3520 'Bloomfield'
- Cooling: Air (Custom)
- Cores: 4,018MHz(+51.05%)
-
Memory details
- Type: 6144MB DDR3 SDRAM
- Speed: @ 765MHz
- Timings: CL6.0 7-6-16 1T
VGA details
- Model: Radeon HD 4770 (RV770 Pro) ATi
- Cooling: Air (Stock)
- Speed: 905MHz (+20.67%) / 1,105MHz (+38.13%)
Mainboard details
- Chipset: Foxconn BloodRage x58
Recent Comments
Sweet commented on his own score:
Try 3520 + xfx 4770
FlashG says:
Please re-read the rules about PCMARK Vantage submissions. A valid FutureMark ORB link is acceptable in lieu of a screen shot.
FlashG
Christian Ney says:
1 - Futuremark removed/or changed the link of a lot of score from theire database. At the end of 2010 and this result is from 2009
Trying to find the result atm. EDIT : didn't find it(using the ID and the search option).
2 - So has his score is with a trial serial, that meens he cannot change settings, so the score is runned at default settings(1nd rule), benchmark score is clearly showed(2nd rule), cpuz tab showed(4th rule), settings not showed but as he used a trial key he cannot change settings so it's ok(3rd rule).
3 - ATM it's not mandatory to show subtest scores.
And btw : The exemple screenshot in the rules is not right(not showing all mandatory tab and it's a pic of PCMar05).
So according to the actual rules this score is legit.
4 - Screenshot is mandatory only since fall of 2010
Christian Ney says:
Ho, in fact you posted under Sweet submission because he blocked one of yours. Not to said his submission is not right.
Screenshot is mandatory since fall of 2010
Rules haven't been updated, it has to be done btw
EDIT : here is the thread : Screenshot Mandatory
says:
No it is not.
This was front page news and first posted on the 27th Oct 2010
Flash could you please not create a thread to discuss a member when what you wish to discuss has nothing to do with that member.
It would have been far better to simply start a thread expressing your inquiry about the rules.
And you are quite correct the rules do need updating and they will be.
However the new Rev of HWBOT is the primary focus of most of the development and BOT mantainence staff. A benchmark that does not impact of either global nor hardware points is understandably low on their list of priorities at this time. So please bare with us and submit your scores with a full and comprehensive screen. Remember more information is better than the barest minimum.
Sweet says:
I think , in July 2009, I try the PCMark Vantage with this cpu, a simple test with air cooling without much Mhz in the Cpu.
Anyway, at that time was not needed as much information as I put on the screen.
But as written 1Day and Christian Ney, since 01/11/2010, all information is required in the screen.This is for all submission, and for all from that time, even for me.
Screen shot is mandatory, with all required, that's all
Thanks Christian and 1Day, for the explanation for FlashG
Regards
Sw
Please log in or register to comment.