I.nfraR.ed says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

Ok, this result got reported. Wrote a comment in the mod tools section, but I'm not sure if it's saved there.

So, I'm writing it here, too

1. Popup with the score says 62149 - exactly the same as the details/subtests window. The main application shows 58731 and that's because I've reran Car Low several times after the first score. Most probably I've reran other test(s) too, but there's no way I can remember now.

2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

GENiEBEN says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

I.nfraR.ed says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

See this one - it has the same 1pt error if you use this formula: (Game Tests "Low" x 10) + [(Game Tests "High" + Nature) x 20]

http://hwbot.org/submission/2315300_tiborrr_3dmark2001_se_geforce_gtx_580_143715_marks

@GENiEBEN: DL is 967.6, not 967.5. According to formula overall score is 62150.

Don_Dan says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

2. I don't know how the score is calculated (will check the datasheet), but there might be a bug? However I'm definitely not a cheater and never tried to be.

01 is easy, all high tests and Nature x 20 + all low tests x 10. Or you can use a fancy program like the one above!

Edit: I am slow.

I.nfraR.ed says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

Yeah, I found the formula. I don't know it by heart, although it's easy and i think will always remember it from now on...

GENiEBEN says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

01 is easy, all high tests and Nature x 20 + all low tests x 10. Or you can use a fancy program like the one above! (

The one I used is here http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=58081

tiborrr says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

Sorry, i reported it, my bad, I didn't know 3DMark doesn't properly sum up subtest scores. I apologize for the inconvenience.

But re-run of CL cannot gain 4000 pts, that's 400 FPS

GENiEBEN says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

But re-run of CL cannot gain 4000 pts, that's 400 FPS

That is true, but the old score in the main window does not get updated until you close the Score Window. So you can run with lower Mhz, get 58K, rerun with overclock and get 62K but this time you dont close the score window, so the main window score doesnt get updated yet.

It's the same for 3D03,05,06...

I.nfraR.ed says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

Appologies accepted. I've always respected you and this accident doesn't change it.

I don't remember the specific case, most probably some of the other tests was very bad compared to others, so I reran it together with the usual CL. If moderators decide it's bugged, I don't really mind. Card should be good for 1080-1100MHz GPU on water.

I will retest it some time in the future.

tiborrr says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

Yes, I am aware of that hence my deepest apology to my slavic brother Infrared

tiborrr says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

P.S.: Looking forward to your benching. I will purchase a 3850 this week and start preparing it

I.nfraR.ed says:

11 year and 4 months ago –

I have a better board and cpu now, so my scores should go up easily,

however I don't know when will have time to bench all this stuff in the list - it's getting bigger and bigger while free time is getting less...

I have some potential #1 cards in popular categories like HD4870, HD4850, GTX280 and so on,

but really needs time, LN2 and proper tweaking. With my 20L dewar I can't even go through all benches in one session.

Not to mention all these s.A and s.939 CPUs for which I need to leave my job in order to test them at least once