Submission Details
Le score de Bullant sur Cinebench - R15 - Elite League
1300 cb avec Intel Xeon X5650 à 5354MHz
Position dans le classement
6608th
WR Rank:
6608th sur un total de 13296
1692nd
Global 6x CPU classement:
1692nd sur un total de 2494
2nd
Xeon X5650 classement:
2nd sur un total de 79
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Points Global (UGP)
1692nd utilisant 6 CPU
-
Points Hardware (UHP)
2nd utilisant Xeon X5650
40.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Points Global Team Power (GTPP) Not Warp9-systems's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Points Hardware Team Power (HTPP) 2nd en équipe utilisant Xeon X5650
20.5 Points
Détails matériel
Détails Processeur
- Modèle: Intel Xeon X5650 'Westmere-EP'
- Refroidissement: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 5 354MHz(+100.83%)
-
Détails mémoire
- Type: DDR3 SDRAM
Détails carte graphique
- Fréquence: MHz / MHz (Stock)
Détails carte mère
- Fabricant: GIGABYTE
- Modèle: GA-X58A-UD9
- Chipset: X58
-
Commentaires récents
ground dit :
Is there a chance you are booting with the 22x multi and adjusting BCLK once booted up? The score seems higher then expected for the clocks, but it would be realistic with the 22x multi. I ran into the same issue while benching my E5649, pretty sure its a bug with CPU-z.
Bullant dit :
Yes man it's what is happening, I was booting with 22 multi, 245-250 blck then up to 255 within windows....it was down clocking to multi 21x after blck adjustment.
I thought it it was just the platform or system, so you think even tho CPUz has downclock 21x from bug that the multi is still 22x? If true that would make core 5.5xx.?
The result is legit it just is possible as you say that it could still be 22x multi that would make it higher freq then cpuz is reporting
ground dit :
Yeah, that should be it, you aren't the first one to run into it. CPU is actually running the higher frequency, its just CPU-z freaking out. I think @TAGG did some testing on that.
Can't your board boot higher BCLK/can you try controlling the multi from within Windows? Booting up to 260 BCLK should be doable on most boards (if not limited by the CPU off course)
Bullant dit :
With the easytune I'm using it wouldn't allow me to adjust multi within window, 255 blck was its limit...when trying 256 blck it would lockup even when booting higher blck to windows
when I try again I can look for a new easytune or something to see if can move multi within windows
the other thing I can do next time is boot 22x multi and 251 blck and then blck to 255 this way the multi should stay at 22x, I think the multi is only downclocking after 5 blck adjustment within windows
Chilli-Man dit :
nice result mate. yeah it's a CPUz and X58 bug, the multi doesn't actually change.
Bullant dit :
Thanks chilli mate
thanks also pointing out Rusty or is it ground1556 ? Your name comes up different twice ahah
suzuki dit :
He has backup accounts prepared already for country cup :)) .
Shh ,don’t let the mods see it.
Btw ,any of you encoutered this problem :
@Bullant @ground1556
ground dit :
No weird shenanigans there, had messaged Rich a while back about the issue but didn't get a response If I reply directly on a Result I always show up as Rusty JS. No idea whats going on with your Black Edition board, but if you solve it I'll gladly take that information, I have similar issues with a DFI x58 Board I picked up a while back
Which PCIe clock are you booting at? Have you tried using Setfsb? Did you play with clock skews? Though 255 under LN2 isn't an unrealistic max usable BCLK even for a 32nm CPU, its about average for batches from '10 (I had much more luck with '11 batches averaging ~250 on air)
TAGG dit :
Your chip was running 5,61GHz during that run i calculated efficiency and that score would fit for that freq
If it was 5.35GHz it would be too good to be true Doesn't the UD9 have some way to adjust multi in OS? i allways booted up my intended bclk and then raised multi in OS to make sure everything displayed correctly...
Bullant dit :
I haven't spent much time on it really, being a new platform for me too, when I have little more time I'm sure I'll get it working, either setfsb, raising multi only within windows with correct easytune.
with 9900k and z390 launch I'm pretty keen to try that atm so not sure when I'll get time on 1366 and all the other legacy platforms I have atm ahah
Jokot dit :
Was experiencing same issue, so my score was on highest I could get while cpuz reported right multi. Only workaround I could find was booting higher bclk on my Asus board.
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter