Demac says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Strange...

superpatodonaldo says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Strange...

not so strange

see your sub

Demac says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Completely different. 20000+ is different than 30000+. I just lower the freq so the prog would be slower -> higher bandwith. (according to my tests.)

superpatodonaldo says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

same done by me, several test until reach it

superpatodonaldo says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

PS probably (or obviously?) this is not a good benchmark for a division.....

TASOS says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Year 2017

People still wondering about the validity of this benchmark ???

It's proven more than enough , in the past ... that you can manipulate the score of this benchmark.

Demac says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

I believe that it shouldn't even be in hwbot list.

websmile says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

If we needed a last proof that maxmem is eol and should be made pointless, here we go - not your fault, I did chose it on purpose to see if new bugs turn up apart from the 1000 we know already - and yes, it did turn up

Niuulh says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

His previous score, same frequencies and 1 minutes diference : http://hwbot.org/submission/3588455_

superpatodonaldo says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

@Niuulh not same frequencies

as said, due to severeal test, lowering only cpu freq (by multiplier) and not ram freq, bandwidth increases;

looking at DDR3 MaxxMem Read Bandwidth's ranking there are a lot of subs with lower cpu freq and high bandwidth

darkgregor says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

The best, is to redo the bench, to verify and close the debate

Fairplay for ever ^^

Niuulh says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

I like like you defend yourself, you double your score by downclocking and try to make it legit... Seriously.... You force a run bug and have no shame to sumbit it..... o/

Demac says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Th problem with this bench is that even if we redo the bench how would we know that e.g the 17000 would be legit and it doesn't mean 15000? We will never know for sure. And as we all know the program has a lot bugs.

Actually it isn't a bug run. By lowering the mhz you give it more time to "pass" mb/s.

rockeur.alexis says:

6 year and 10 months ago –

Oh gosh, this is the end of Overclocking now its downclocking time, run bug 10K diff and nobody kick that score ? And since when downclocking give more bandwith....

unityofsaints says:

5 years ago – Gotta delete this, seriously

superpatodonaldo says:

5 years ago – wow, still talking about this; why no one complain about hwboints are still alive on wellknownbugged benchs?