提交成绩的细节
ZFeSS的3DMark2001 SE成绩
- 极限联盟
18687 marks 和 NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200 128 在 360/380MHz
排名位置
n/a
全球1x GPU排名:
n/a
GeForce4 Ti 4200 128 排名:
Points earned for overclocker league
-
全球分数(UGP)
Not ZFeSS's best submission
0.0 积分
-
硬件分数(UHP)
Not ZFeSS's best GeForce4 Ti 4200 128 submission
0.0 积分
Points earned for team league
-
全球战队能量分 (GTPP) Not Not Exact In Round's best submission
0.0 积分
-
硬件战队能量分(HTPP) Not Not Exact In Round's best GeForce4 Ti 4200 128 submission
0.0 积分
多媒体部分
- 屏幕截图
-
硬件细节
CPU细节
- 型号： AMD Athlon XP 2500+ (Barton) 'Barton'
- 散热: Water (Custom)
- Cores: 2,787 MHz (+52.05%)
内存细节
- 产品: Winbond
- 类别 512MB DDR SD-RAM
- 计时： CL2.0 2-2-11 1T
显卡细节
- 型号： GeForce4 Ti 4200 128 (NV25) NVIDIA
- 散热: Water (Custom)
- 速度：: 360 MHz (+44.00%) / 380 MHz (+71.17%)
主板细节
- 厂商: Abit
- 型号： AN7
- 散热: Air (Custom)
- 芯片组： nForce2 Ultra 400
-
近期的评论
Let's push it a bit more.
Asus Ti4200 3.3ns mem. Water temp +6C. Chipset waterblock from RE on GPU. vGPU 1.92v, vMem 3.05v.
vDD mod, vMem mod, 3.3v PSU rail mod - useless.
CPU is capable for 2810 but not this time.
great score on water! How come you use tras 11 instead of 5 as stock?
Thanks. Looks like 19k was possible, too bad that I didn't recheck boost from raising agp clocks.
AFAIK tras 11 is faster than any other, tested by many other people before. Didn't checked it in this case really.
11 was/is considered faster and more stable, but I think it had been related to something specific to bioses/chipset revisions back then.
To me 5 is faster on my boards and bioses I use (self-modded latest offcial bioses for my boards).
For me 5 > 7 > 9 > 11, exactly how it should be.
BTW, nice score! I should have played safe and just use the chiller.
请登录或注册后才能评论