Submission details
I.nfraR.ed`s Cinebench - R11.5 score - Extreme League
1.85 cb with AMD Sempron 145 at 6481MHz
Ranking position
9366th
WR Rank:
9366th out of 10150
2nd
Global 1x CPU rank:
2nd out of 570
2nd
Sempron 145 rank:
2nd out of 171
Points earned for overclocker league
-
World Record Points
9366th
-
Global Points
2nd using 1 CPU
-
Hardware Points
2nd using Sempron 145
52.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) 2nd in team using 1 CPU
145.2 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 2nd in team using Sempron 145
42.4 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: AMD Sempron 145 'Sargas' (1 cores active)
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 6,481 MHz (+131.46%)
Memory details
- Manufacturer: Crucial
- Product: Ballistix (classic)
- Cooling: Air (Stock)
- Type: 2048MB DDR2 SDRAM
- Speed: @ 463MHz
- Batch: D9GKX
- Timings: CL4.0 4-4-5 2T
VGA details
- Model: GeForce 8500 GT DDR2 256 Mb (G84) NVIDIA
- Speed: 450 MHz / 400 MHz (Stock)
Mainboard details
- Manufacturer: DFI
- Model: LANParty DK 790FXB-M2RSH
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Chipset: 790FX
-
Recent Comments
I.nfraR.ed commented on his own score:
No idea why it doesn't want to run higher on CB11.5, while it does 6.6+ on CB15.
ObscureParadox@3XS says:
Holy mother of jebus
Moose83 says:
Just awesome!
robbo2 says:
Great result mate
Calathea says:
Kind of neat Very weird chip behaviour though compared to R15, had it been the other way around I'd understand.
I.nfraR.ed says:
Yes. It feels stable, can run CB15 at much higher frequency, does not bsod, just crashes - sometimes even immediately.
It's not the HT link, RAM or NB frequency. If I drop the cpu multi it will run, so it's the cpu. And it's the same in 3 different sessions.
Hope that's enough for this stage though.
Maybe I could try XP x64 next time.
Bong313 says:
wow! nice score ivan!
kotori says:
Awesome!
Farjam says:
amazing test again
Wizerty says:
As I told you, on mine it's really hard to reach hi freq on seven
I.nfraR.ed says:
Wiz, is that for CB11.5 only or in general? You told me before, but I don't remember.
Because it does way higher frequency for other benchmarks, while for CB11.5 higher vcore makes things worse. For example it crashes on the same 6480 with 1.8V. It also feels very stable - I can do whatever I want in OS - unpack zip files, run CB15 all day long, but it simply crashes in CB11.5. Spent a lot of time to get that 6480 run.
HT Ref is not a problem, because I can boot even at 500 and most of my scores are done with HT Ref set in bios and direct boot to OS.
For example that 6940 validation was done with direct boot at 496 HT Ref.
Couldn't make 497x14 no matter what - tried direct 497 boot or with setfsb in os - black screeb and restart. I set multi with K10stat, ofcourse.
For 7GHz I would need 500x14 and that was not possible. Maybe with 1.95+ V on the cpu...I don't know.
Wizerty says:
In general... BUT, last time, I switch to my old OS, the one I use everyday on my computer, and I don't know why but it can boot with hight HTT.... crazy, I try 3 seven, no go, I take an old one with lot of programme... and it work.
So try on other one.... or XP 64
Please log in or register to comment.