I figured submissions are being accepted even though submitting from 3DMark,com doesn't work and the rule is worded as "must be submitted directly from..."
So LOD is now illegal and what I suppose to do? A lot of the guys got top scores. Unfair advantage to say the least. If you want to play for real - wipe all Time Spy rankings, start over and lets see who won the silicone lottery.
Hi all :)
Under new regs I see LOD/TESS allowed (Is TESS the AMD equivalent of NVIDIA LOD?), it's no longer a "VALID" link obligatory, just a link to the run.
Under these rules, would this run be allowed (AA modified):
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/61954020
Christian Ney dit :
MetalRacer dit :
Just curious if these are considered valid?
ttps://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25253299
https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25076698
Mr.Scott dit :
cbjaust dit :
is the submit direct from 3Dmark.com function working? I don't see an option to for directly submitting a score from 3DMark.com anymore...
leeghoofd dit :
just add manually... don' tbe lazy ?
cbjaust dit :
Yeah, I always do put up results manually, I was questioning the rule about having to send the scores via 3DMark.com:
http://hwbot.org/news/13722_application_198_rules/
leeghoofd dit :
We just need to crosscheck the result on FM
cbjaust dit :
I figured submissions are being accepted even though submitting from 3DMark,com doesn't work and the rule is worded as "must be submitted directly from..."
Lopata dit :
So LOD is now illegal and what I suppose to do? A lot of the guys got top scores. Unfair advantage to say the least. If you want to play for real - wipe all Time Spy rankings, start over and lets see who won the silicone lottery.
Mr.Scott dit :
Report the subs you see LOD and tessellation tweaks being used. They will be removed.
leeghoofd dit :
LOD was never allowed with Timespy from day 1...
Lopata dit :
@leeghoofd no way... Damn I need to wash my eyes... Always thought that every 3dmark had LOD in the Allowed "optimisation" list.
leeghoofd dit :
Timespy didn't require a screeznshot at start, only a VALID futuremark link
leeghoofd dit :
New 2020 scores: Require CPU-Z 1.91 or newer version New 2020 scores: Full desktop screenshot required ( no clipping)
L0wpull dit :
Hi all :) Under new regs I see LOD/TESS allowed (Is TESS the AMD equivalent of NVIDIA LOD?), it's no longer a "VALID" link obligatory, just a link to the run. Under these rules, would this run be allowed (AA modified): https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/61954020
leeghoofd dit :
This is what I see in the TimeSpy (Extreme rules)
a VALID UL verification link is required (LOD/TESS NOT ALLOWED)
You are referring to a Firestrike score where LOD/Tess mod is allowed....
Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter