Christian Ney says:

timespy.png

United States MetalRacer says:

Just curious if these are considered valid?

ttps://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25253299

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25076698

 

United States Mr.Scott says:

2 hours ago, MetalRacer said:

Just curious if these are considered valid?

ttps://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25253299

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/25076698

 

Quote

 

Verification link

 

  •  So, no, I would say not valid.

Australia cbjaust says:

is the submit direct from 3Dmark.com function working? I don't see an option to for directly submitting a score from 3DMark.com anymore...

Belgium leeghoofd says:

just add manually... don' tbe lazy 😛

Australia cbjaust says:

Yeah, I always do put up results manually, I was questioning the rule about having to send the scores via 3DMark.com:

image.thumb.png.29af0e3c1c398d8b174537f055b35ed8.png

http://hwbot.org/news/13722_application_198_rules/

Belgium leeghoofd says:

We just need to crosscheck the result on FM

Australia cbjaust says:

I figured submissions are being accepted even though submitting from 3DMark,com doesn't work and the rule is worded as "must be submitted directly from..."

Ukraine Lopata says:

So LOD is now illegal and what I suppose to do? A lot of the guys got top scores. Unfair advantage to say the least. If you want to play for real - wipe all Time Spy rankings, start over and lets see who won the silicone lottery.

United States Mr.Scott says:

Report the subs you see LOD and tessellation tweaks being used. They will be removed.

Belgium leeghoofd says:

LOD was never allowed with Timespy from day 1...

Ukraine Lopata says:

@leeghoofd no way... Damn I need to wash my eyes... Always thought that every 3dmark had LOD in the Allowed "optimisation" list.

Belgium leeghoofd says:

Timespy didn't require a screeznshot at start, only a VALID futuremark link

Belgium leeghoofd says:

New 2020 scores: Require CPU-Z 1.91 or newer version New 2020 scores: Full desktop screenshot required ( no clipping)

United Kingdom L0wpull says:

Hi all :) Under new regs I see LOD/TESS allowed (Is TESS the AMD equivalent of NVIDIA LOD?), it's no longer a "VALID" link obligatory, just a link to the run. Under these rules, would this run be allowed (AA modified): https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/61954020

Belgium leeghoofd says:

This is what I see in the TimeSpy (Extreme rules)

a VALID UL verification link is required (LOD/TESS NOT ALLOWED)

 

You are referring to a Firestrike score where LOD/Tess mod is allowed....

Please log in or register to comment.