HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC4: DDR4

Officiel
En ligne
Follow on OC-ESPORTS

HWBOT Team Cup 2019 Roadmap


1 août 2019 - 1 octobre 2019: HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC1: DDR1


1 août 2019 - 1 octobre 2019: HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC2: DDR2


			1 août 2019 - 1 octobre 2019: HWBOT Team Cup 2019


1 août 2019 - 1 octobre 2019: HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC3: DDR3


1 août 2019 - 1 octobre 2019: HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC4: DDR4

Participer

HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC4: DDR4 est terminé depuis 1 octobre 2019.
Cette compétition est entre équipes.

Cette compétition est fermée. Vous ne pouvez plus y accéder.

Epreuves

Stage 1 - Geekbench4 - Multi Core with BenchMate - Dual cores
Stage 2 - HWBOT x265 Benchmark - 4k - 4 - 6 & 8 cores
Stage 3 - Unigine Superposition - 1080P Xtreme
Stage 4 - 3DMark Port Royal
Stage 5 - 3DMark - Fire Strike Integrated Radeon graphics
Stage 6 - Cinebench - R20 with BenchMate - Per core
Stage 7 - Aquamark AMD CPUs & GPUs only

Participants

Equipes participantes

Rejoindre

Discussions (0)

Discuss the competition at the HWBOT forum (123 comments)

HWBOT General Rules and Guidelines

Here at HWBOT we try our best to deliver a fair and enjoyable playing field for all those who participate in the rankings and competition. To be able to provide this kind of service we have tried to design some submission and general rules to help remove any doubts about whether something is allowed or not. Based on continued experience these rules will be updated, expanded and completed as time goes by. Please check back for any updates.

Temps restant :

Fermé!

Sélectionner le classement de l'épreuve:

Global
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

HWBOT Team Cup 2019 - SC4: DDR4Classement

Overclock.net

292 pts

Team Hardware-Reaktor-Reloaded

268 pts

Overclockers.UA

259 pts

Warp9-systems

252 pts

Overclockers.com

226 pts

XtremeOverdrive OC team Italy

206 pts

Team MLG

198 pts

Hardware Canucks

196 pts

Madshrimps Belgium OC Team

195 pts

Cowcotland

154 pts

AMD Red Team

147 pts

Wegg

129 pts

Team Spartan

120 pts

Enthusiasts of United States

112 pts

ocXtreme

75 pts

Hellas Overclocking Team

74 pts

Team Russia

72 pts

Remarc

55 pts

OC Krue

55 pts

Enthusiasts of United Kingdom

47 pts

Team Finland

43 pts

TeamOcMotion

36 pts

Team Hungary

34 pts

MSI Americas OC

32 pts

Enthusiasts of Germany

32 pts

Australia OC

32 pts

Independent OC Team

24 pts

Enthusiasts of Ireland

24 pts

Intel-AMD Overclocking and Benchmarking

22 pts

ASUS Republic of Gamers

20 pts

ChemasOverclockingTeam

19 pts

The Reapers

16 pts

EVGA Enthusiasts

6 pts

Compétition officielle

This is an online event. Participants can compete from all around the world, and make submissions online.

As this is an official level 2 competition, competitors will receive season points for the final ranking as following.

Commentaires

31 juillet 2019 Lopata says:

Is LOD bias allowed to be changed for any of the DDR4 GPU stages?

31 juillet 2019 leeghoofd says:

NO LOD: Firestrike, Port Royal, the submission has to be VALID at Futuremark/Ul website

Superposition and AM3 its up to you

31 juillet 2019 Lopata says:

1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:

Superposition and AM3 its up to you

Alright, thanks. You just confirmed my thoughts.

Wish there was a way to detect this crap in each 3D bench so people can focus on getting a score and not on killing the image quality... And it's probably were discussed many times before me.

31 juillet 2019 AvengedRobix says:

Tomorrow add port Royale to supported bench? finally

1 août 2019 Lopata says:

Superposition result file can't be uploaded. What I am doing wrong? "Invalid data file: Unable to parse the datafile".

1 août 2019 Remarc says:

"Cinebench - R20 with BenchMate"

"Geekbench4 - Multi Core with BenchMate"

what is that?

1 août 2019 Lopata says:

4 minutes ago, Remarc said:

what is that?

???

1 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

5 hours ago, Lopata said:

Superposition result file can't be uploaded. What I am doing wrong? "Invalid data file: Unable to parse the datafile".

looking into it sir, thx for reporting

1 août 2019 AvengedRobix says:

in hwbot x265 for example... if i use a 3900X with only 8 core active is valid?

1 août 2019 yosarianilives says:

1 minute ago, AvengedRobix said:

in hwbot x265 for example... if i use a 3900X with only 8 core active is valid?

No. Would still count as a 12 core cpu.

1 août 2019 AvengedRobix says:

Just now, yosarianilives said:

No. Would still count as a 12 core cpu.

tnx.. perfect ?.. re open my 9900 from the box

1 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

6 hours ago, Lopata said:

Superposition result file can't be uploaded. What I am doing wrong? "Invalid data file: Unable to parse the datafile".

Edited the Superposition 1080P Extreme stage, just submit by using a screenshot (made according the the rules)

1 août 2019 Lopata says:

18 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

Edited the Superposition 1080P Extreme stage, just submit by using a screenshot (made according the the rules)

Thanks! Just uploaded my result. I am #1 ?

1 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

Submitted a CB R20 score through benchmate and I wouldnt link it to the competition so I tried to manually submit the .hwbot file that benchmate saved but that apparently got removed. Is there a way that I can have the benchmate submitted score linked to the comp? Or is there something within benchmate that im not seeing that will link the submission?

1 août 2019 Lopata says:

24 minutes ago, CjMitsuki said:

Submitted a CB R20 score through benchmate and I wouldnt link it to the competition so I tried to manually submit the .hwbot file that benchmate saved but that apparently got removed. Is there a way that I can have the benchmate submitted score linked to the comp? Or is there something within benchmate that im not seeing that will link the submission?

What I did is just saved my result file manually and then manually uploaded it to the competition ranking. Benchmate cant predict what are you going to do with it, it;s just an app that makes things fair and square and a little bit easier to upload since it's got built in hardware detection/monitoring. So yeah, as always, there is some things to press for your fingers ?

2 août 2019 Bones says:

10 characters

2 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

Yeah, i suppose I will have to do that with R20 but during the benchmate comp I didnt have a problem uploading from the benchmate software. It always immediately linked to the comp. I also found a bug with custom resolutions through the Nvidia display settings. I have a 1920x1080 monitor and you cant fit CB R20 on it so I used nvidia settings to make a 4k resolution to fit it all on there. Well, it seems that benchmate doesn't recognize the resolution change and benchmate cut most of the screenshot out. Ill have to report it to Mat when Im home from work in a few hours so I can replicate it and confirm what it looks to be doing. The bench was just a rough trial bench so not worried about losing that score. Looks like manually uploading Cinebench runs will have to be how it is until the problem is patched.

2 août 2019 cbjaust says:

I think this is because for the competitiion the end result for R20 is divided by the number of cores so you have to submit via the link on the competitiion page. I also submitted an R20 result in the normal way with the big submit button and there is no pop-up giving the option to enter the running comp. For the benches with the same conditions as usual I think you'll see the competition pop-ups when submitting in the usual manner.

2 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

I'll reconfigure CBR20 to a screenshot only iso datafile.

2 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

I found out what the deal was. When setting a custom 4k resolution which wasnt supported by my monitor W10 was scaling it to 150% which looked great on screen but for some reason Benchmate sees the normal resolution of 1920 x 1080 but keeping the 150% scaling that windows was doing which was cropping everything. Setting the 4k res and disabling the auto scaling that windows was doing allowed me to get everything in the screenshot hut I felt like Mr Magoo trying to read the text without scaling to make everything a normal size in relation to the resolution. Still would be nice if Benchmate could recognize the extended display but yeah, definitely some problem with custom resolutions and scaling being seen properly by benchmate. Im just going to add that to the growing list of why W10 is shit and put the blame there. W10 being at fault sounds like the more believable story anyway.

2 août 2019 yosarianilives says:

Is R20 supposed to be total score or divided by cores?

2 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

divided why ?

2 août 2019 yosarianilives says:

26 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

divided why ?

The score is behaving as if it is a per core score not a total score.

2 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

choose your cpu wisely

2 août 2019 yosarianilives says:

17 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

choose your cpu wisely

So yet another copy paste stage from last year...

2 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

If you don't like my "copy pasting", than don't bench the stage, Honestly getting tired of these smart ass comments… maybe you should bunk up with someone of your caliber and make some cry babies. so your species can dominate the world….

Divided per core gives a more even playgrount where not the best or most expensive hardware wins…

2 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

???

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

3 août 2019 Lopata says:

15 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Divided per core gives a more even playgrount where not the best or most expensive hardware wins…

Is the same rule applies to DDR4 x265 4K? If so, I would be glad to see this info being added to rule list on both official stage pages.

3 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

Nope X265 is the average of the 3 scores,

Fyi this has been done for a long time with the CB series, users always wanted to have CB divided per core to even it out more ( way higher scores than X265)

I added " per core" to the CB11,,15 and R20 benches titles

3 août 2019 Lopata says:

6 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

Nope X265 is the average of the 3 scores,

Fyi this has been done for a long time with the CB series, users always wanted to have CB divided per core to even it out more ( way higher scores than X265)

I added " per core" to the CB11,,15 and R20 benches titles

Aright, thanks. Me and my teammates were figuring out if x265 going to be "divided" or not. 9900k FTW than ?

3 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

its easy to do the math: Sub one score, if it gets divided by 3, it's not per core ranking but the average of the 3 scores

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

Is Windows 10 allowed in DDR4 Stage 7 Aquamark for Matisse (and Raven Ridge for that matter)?

3 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

yes 2000/3000 APU series can be used with Win10

3 août 2019 Lopata says:

8 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

its easy to do the math: Sub one score, if it gets divided by 3, it's not per core ranking but the average of the 3 scores

Such things should be explained in advance and put into the rules list, it's not our deal to figure it out. Why then we just dont run CB single core ranking? Or as an adittion to R20 overall per-core...

3 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

if we ran single core: take eg you run 3 cpus in your team (8600k, 8700K and 9900K) on water with +/-5000Mhz, all scores could be plus/minus equal.

Making it similar to the average score... dividing per core makes this stage more interesting in picking the right processor

If we have to add everything in the rules we would need bigger monitors to get it all in there ?

3 août 2019 Lopata says:

7 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

if we ran single core: take eg you run 3 cpus in your team (8600k, 8700K and 9900K) on water with +/-5000Mhz, all scores could be plus/minus equal.

Making it similar to the average score... dividing per core makes this stage more interesting in picking the right processor

If we have to add everything in the rules we would need bigger monitors to get it all in there ?

It's my first time ever participating in the overclocking online event and such basic thing as the way score gets calculated is important to know.

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

36 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

yes 2000/3000 APU series can be used with Win10

OK to be clear, Raven Ridge APUs (Zen), Picasso APUs (Zen+) and Matisse CPUs (Zen2) are all ok with Windows 10? What about Summit Ridge CPUs (Zen)?

Thanks. Sorry for the extra dumb questions.

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

You can go to the rules link and it will tell you which OS you can run on each benchmark

3 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

The AMD APUs you mentioned are authorized for Win10,, Summit Ridge is not (without Benchmate supported benchmarks), so for AM3 usage eg you will need to run 7 on eg 1700X

3 août 2019 Bilko says:

6 minutes ago, cbjaust said:

OK to be clear, Raven Ridge APUs (Zen), Picasso APUs (Zen+) and Matisse CPUs (Zen2) are all ok with Windows 10? What about Summit Ridge CPUs (Zen)?

Thanks. Sorry for the extra dumb questions.

From how I understand it atm Raven Ridge and Picasso are fine on 10 but Matisse isn't (outside of the usual 3DMark, x265, Benchmate)

So Matisse, Pinnacle Ridge and Summit Ridge are all in the same boat.

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

1 minute ago, Bilko said:

From how I understand it atm Raven Ridge and Picasso are fine on 10 but Matisse isn't (outside of the usual 3DMark, x265, Benchmate)

So Matisse, Pinnacle Ridge and Summit Ridge are all in the same boat.

I haven't yet managed to get Windows 7 working satisfactorily on Matisse. I'm getting driver related BSODs - not sure if it's the GPU or USB3 though. (Ryzen 5 3600X and Vega 56)

3 août 2019 Bilko says:

2 minutes ago, cbjaust said:

I haven't yet managed to get Windows 7 working satisfactorily on Matisse. I'm getting driver related BSODs - not sure if it's the GPU or USB3 though. (Ryzen 5 3600X and Vega 56)

I haven't tried as yet but if I get it running I'll let you know

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

If you are using X570 it may require a usb driver hack or just plug your keyboard and mouse into usb 2.0 ports and see if that works. X470 should be fairly easy as you can download software that will auto inject the appropriate drivers for you.

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

C6H here - X370

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

Google “Asus EZ Installer”

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

9 minutes ago, CjMitsuki said:

Google “Asus EZ Installer”

Yeah, know about. Thanks though. Maybe the problem is expecting the same Windows 7 install on the same board with just a new CPU (1800X -> 3600X) to just work. I have not tries a fresh install, in fact I think I've been benching the same Windows 7 install I first built for the initial install on the 1800X a couple of years ago.

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

Yeah, the registry is probably causing problems if it was installed with the older cpu. Its good to refresh the installs anyway. Keeps them fast.

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

OK tried a fresh install and USB worked for the initial install but after the first reboot USB is not working and a message pops up during the Configuring Devices stage "Windows Setup could not configure Windows to run on this computer's hardware."

3 août 2019 CjMitsuki says:

Did you immediately install the chipset drivers after you got into the OS? The drivers it needs are in that package.

3 août 2019 cbjaust says:

14 minutes ago, CjMitsuki said:

Did you immediately install the chipset drivers after you got into the OS? The drivers it needs are in that package.

This is getting a bit off-topic... but, it never made it to the desktop - it couldn't get past the last stage of the install which is when it configures the hardware.

6 août 2019 TAGG says:

That 4-6-8 core x265 stage seems a bit drunk... For some reason you can use 2x 8core CPUs

EDIT: Same might apply for AM3 gpupi 2-4-6, not sure though but please check

7 août 2019 Bilko says:

3 hours ago, TAGG said:

That 4-6-8 core x265 stage seems a bit drunk... For some reason you can use 2x 8core CPUs

EDIT: Same might apply for AM3 gpupi 2-4-6, not sure though but please check

After a quick look this is happening on my team as well, I wouldn't expect that to be normal behavior.

7 août 2019 leeghoofd says:

fixed

7 août 2019 Bilko says:

29 minutes ago, Leeghoofd said:

fixed

You da man ?

8 août 2019 _mat_ says:

On 8/3/2019 at 6:56 PM, Bilko said:

From how I understand it atm Raven Ridge and Picasso are fine on 10 but Matisse isn't (outside of the usual 3DMark, x265, Benchmate)

So Matisse, Pinnacle Ridge and Summit Ridge are all in the same boat.

I would not count on that at all. AMD CPUs are using their LAPIC timer for the System Clock Interrupt in Windows 8+. That timer completely depends on the ref clock. The same goes for the TSC on AMD, it's basically the same timer source as the LAPIC timer. So if there is any possibility to change the ref clock, it will result in skewed benchmark results.

8 août 2019 _mat_ says:

On 8/2/2019 at 2:19 AM, CjMitsuki said:

Yeah, i suppose I will have to do that with R20 but during the benchmate comp I didnt have a problem uploading from the benchmate software. It always immediately linked to the comp. I also found a bug with custom resolutions through the Nvidia display settings. I have a 1920x1080 monitor and you cant fit CB R20 on it so I used nvidia settings to make a 4k resolution to fit it all on there. Well, it seems that benchmate doesn't recognize the resolution change and benchmate cut most of the screenshot out. Ill have to report it to Mat when Im home from work in a few hours so I can replicate it and confirm what it looks to be doing. The bench was just a rough trial bench so not worried about losing that score. Looks like manually uploading Cinebench runs will have to be how it is until the problem is patched.

BenchMate can't link to any competition, HWBOT doesn't support that via its submission API.

Regarding the custom resolution, that's an NVIDIA feature that obviously reports the wrong parameters to the WIN32 API functions. It's neither a BenchMate nor a Windows 10 fault, that one's all on NVIDIA. I'll see if I find a way around. BenchMate already uses NVAPI to detect special NVIDIA features like SLI. There will surely be a way to detect this, but don't count on it soon. My list is pretty long.

9 août 2019 Bilko says:

2 hours ago, _mat_ said:

I would not count on that at all. AMD CPUs are using their LAPIC timer for the System Clock Interrupt in Windows 8+. That timer completely depends on the ref clock. The same goes for the TSC on AMD, it's basically the same timer source as the LAPIC timer. So if there is any possibility to change the ref clock, it will result in skewed benchmark results.

Wasn't meaning anything to do with ref clk, it's more the APUs are alot harder to get working on Win 7 (if at all) so it's either they are allowed on 10 and the mods keep an eye out for stray results or they get banned from the site.

10 août 2019 MaddMutt says:

I'm sorry I keep asking this EVERY YEAR but I like to have it verified - Use 2 processor core(s) in total - This wording implies that you can use a 4-6-8-++ CPU and disable all but 2 cores enabled. If it is for Dual Cores only, it should read: Dual Core Processors Only with HT Disabled.

Thank You

10 août 2019 Noxinite says:

1 hour ago, MaddMutt said:

I'm sorry I keep asking this EVERY YEAR but I like to have it verified - Use 2 processor core(s) in total - This wording implies that you can use a 4-6-8-++ CPU and disable all but 2 cores enabled. If it is for Dual Cores only, it should read: Dual Core Processors Only with HT

But disabling cores is not just explicitly banned for comps, but for all of HWBot (where it matters).

Although, admittedly it isn't on the stage rules itself.

10 août 2019 Don_Dan says:

1 hour ago, MaddMutt said:

I'm sorry I keep asking this EVERY YEAR but I like to have it verified - Use 2 processor core(s) in total - This wording implies that you can use a 4-6-8-++ CPU and disable all but 2 cores enabled. If it is for Dual Cores only, it should read: Dual Core Processors Only with HT Disabled.

Thank You

'Use 2 processor core(s) in total' means you should use a dual core or an unlocked single core CPU. The same goes for the 3 core CPU stage.

Disabling cores to enter lower core count rankings/competitions is never allowed on HWBOT.

12 août 2019 Dead Things says:

Quote

CPU-Z validation link must show type of memory sticks being used

@Leeghoofd How do I force it to do that if it doesn't do it on its own? The sticks were specified in the sub and visible in the rig pic. https://hwbot.org/submission/4212903_

12 août 2019 Mr.Scott says:

3 hours ago, Dead Things said:

@Leeghoofd How do I force it to do that if it doesn't do it on its own? The sticks were specified in the sub and visible in the rig pic. https://hwbot.org/submission/4212903_

SPD tab.

12 août 2019 TAGG says:

4 hours ago, Dead Things said:

@Leeghoofd How do I force it to do that if it doesn't do it on its own? The sticks were specified in the sub and visible in the rig pic. https://hwbot.org/submission/4212903_

Try installing CPU-Z instead of using the portable version, fixed it for me

12 août 2019 Dead Things says:

You mean just opening the SPD tab will make the stick info get populated in the validation link?

ahh - that's a good idea TAGG - thanks. I'll try that.

12 août 2019 Mr.Scott says:

51 minutes ago, Dead Things said:

You mean just opening the SPD tab will make the stick info get populated in the validation link?

ahh - that's a good idea TAGG - thanks. I'll try that.

No. I meant you need a SPD tab in your ss for any comp bench that has to do with memory.

20 août 2019 Matsglobetrotter says:

would be fun if we had some separation between threads and cores in some stages so we could use the true CPUs that dont use the threads also. i got a few of 4,6,8 cores to add to the mix .

22 août 2019 Jumper118 says:

On 8/20/2019 at 6:48 AM, Matsglobetrotter said:

would be fun if we had some separation between threads and cores in some stages so we could use the true CPUs that dont use the threads also. i got a few of 4,6,8 cores to add to the mix .

i think its a bit late to change it now will have to wait for country cup or team cup next year

5 septembre 2019 Matsglobetrotter says:

On 8/23/2019 at 5:26 AM, Jumper118 said:

i think its a bit late to change it now will have to wait for country cup or team cup next year

? no worries.. The team putting together the competitions are creative ? Meanwhile getting a few more CPU's

6 septembre 2019 unityofsaints says:

On 8/3/2019 at 5:53 PM, Leeghoofd said:

The AMD APUs you mentioned are authorized for Win10,, Summit Ridge is not (without Benchmate supported benchmarks), so for AM3 usage eg you will need to run 7 on eg 1700X

Follow up on this, there are a numbers of invalid subs with Ryzen non-APUs on Win 10. Could this be cleaned up before it gets out of hand?

10 septembre 2019 unityofsaints says:

Any idea why my FS sub got pulled from the comp?

https://hwbot.org/submission/4213802_unityofsaints_3dmark___fire_strike_radeon_rx_vega_8_mobile_2657_marks

Systeminfo is up to date, rigpic attached. I don't see any issues. Easy to rebench, just wanna know for next time.

10 septembre 2019 Bilko says:

7 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Any idea why my FS sub got pulled from the comp?

https://hwbot.org/submission/4213802_unityofsaints_3dmark___fire_strike_radeon_rx_vega_8_mobile_2657_marks

Systeminfo is up to date, rigpic attached. I don't see any issues. Easy to rebench, just wanna know for next time.

Quote

A VALID Futuremark verification link is required (systeminfo 5.17 or newer)

Your link has unknown hardware and Tess off.

10 septembre 2019 unityofsaints says:

2 hours ago, Bilko said:

Your link has unknown hardware and Tess off.

Tess off is allowed for FS though? Unknown hardware may be unavoidable on this laptop.

10 septembre 2019 Bilko says:

Valid scores according to UL are WHQL driver and no driver changes (LOD/Tess).

Normal Firestrike rules don't apply here

See here: https://benchmarks.ul.com/support/approved-drivers

10 septembre 2019 unityofsaints says:

1 hour ago, Bilko said:

Valid scores according to UL are WHQL driver and no driver changes (LOD/Tess).

Normal Firestrike rules don't apply here

See here: https://benchmarks.ul.com/support/approved-drivers

That didn't solve the issue

10 septembre 2019 yosarianilives says:

3 hours ago, unityofsaints said:

Tess off is allowed for FS though? Unknown hardware may be unavoidable on this laptop.

You can't disable tess for the comp, if the hardware is unknown (cpu not recognized, gpu not recognized) then make sure that "windows management instrumentation" service is enabled. Also try an older driver, make sure it's a whql one. The service usually fixes cpu not recognized, gpu not recognized would be a driver issue.

10 septembre 2019 bloodkil says:

How long should it take for submissions to be reflected?

10 septembre 2019 leeghoofd says:

Competions rules can differ from the standard rules.

In this case a VALID link means the score is VALID (green) at FM/ULwebsite, thus no tampering with driver detail setting or such....

Reflect submissions? you mean moderate? I'm on biss trip in Germany, not much time to do so atm

10 septembre 2019 unityofsaints says:

Ok, here's a tess ON, WHQL driver, Systeminfo 5.17 run. Still GPU not recognised:

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/39313148

10 septembre 2019 Mr.Scott says:

https://support.futuremark.com/futuremark/topics/processor_is_not_recognized_graphics_card_is_not_recognized?topic-reply-list[settings]

=34#topic-reply-list

11 septembre 2019 Dead Things says:

What's the deal with Stage 4.3 and Windows 10? I know Superposition can run on Win7, but when I look at all the scores in the comp so far and most of the scores across the bot, they've all been done with Win10. So - Win10 allowed here? And, I guess the same question for Stage 4.7. I know Win10 is allowed for Stage 4.5 because it's IGPU plus a valid link is needed anyway - but I'd like to get some clarity on the other two stages. Thanks!

11 septembre 2019 keeph8n says:

41 minutes ago, Dead Things said:

What's the deal with Stage 4.3 and Windows 10? I know Superposition can run on Win7, but when I look at all the scores in the comp so far and most of the scores across the bot, they've all been done with Win10. So - Win10 allowed here? And, I guess the same question for Stage 4.7. I know Win10 is allowed for Stage 4.5 because it's IGPU plus a valid link is needed anyway - but I'd like to get some clarity on the other two stages. Thanks!

afaik, 3D does NOT have any OS limitations which both of the Stages in question falls under

11 septembre 2019 cbjaust says:

Usual benchmark rules apply as far as OS goes: Win 10 only allowed for Systems with no bclk adjustment and Skylake/Kabylake (and I presume Coffelake and the -X variants)

11 septembre 2019 yosarianilives says:

1 hour ago, keeph8n said:

afaik, 3D does NOT have any OS limitations which both of the Stages in question falls under

That's only for Futuremark benches with a valid link, aqua and superposition generally require win 7 on non lake cpus with bclk adjustment which in practice is all non lake cpus with some exceptions such as apus.

11 septembre 2019 Dead Things says:

Okay - thanks for confirming my suspicions, gentlemen. Looks like there's gonna be a lot of scores moderated in those stages. Cheers!

12 septembre 2019 Bilko says:

On 9/11/2019 at 7:25 AM, unityofsaints said:

Ok, here's a tess ON, WHQL driver, Systeminfo 5.17 run. Still GPU not recognised:

https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/39313148

Score is now Valid, guess they added it to the database

14 septembre 2019 jpmboy says:

so I made this sub a couple of days ago: https://hwbot.org/submission/4237574_ and it has been blocked or deleted. I'm not sure why. An explanation so I can "do it right" would be appreciated

14 septembre 2019 leeghoofd says:

Moderator changed status from 'null' to 'incorrect submission' - reason: no windows 10 with Ryzen and AM3

14 septembre 2019 jpmboy says:

Thank you... no W10 with Ryzen (AM4) or AM3 is how I read the reply. Correct? Guess I'd have to Jerry-rig a win7 ssd for that PC to play.

14 septembre 2019 yosarianilives says:

7 minutes ago, jpmboy said:

Thank you... no W10 with Ryzen (AM4) or AM3 is how I read the reply. Correct? Guess I'd have to Jerry-rig a win7 ssd for that PC to play.

In this case AM3 is aquamark 3, you can do ryzen+3dmark with valid link

14 septembre 2019 jpmboy says:

AM3 = Aquamark? Lol AM3, AM4, bench, socket... missed the acronym. ?

19 septembre 2019 Dead Things says:

Can anybody point me in the right direction to download and old version of Benchmate with Geekbench for Stage 4.1?

19 septembre 2019 cbjaust says:

55 minutes ago, Dead Things said:

Can anybody point me in the right direction to download and old version of Benchmark with Geekbench for Stage 4.1?

That was Geekbench 3. There's a link to it on a thread on here somewhere.

19 septembre 2019 Dead Things says:

Sorry - I meant "Benchmate" not "Benchmark" - d'oh!

19 septembre 2019 _mat_ says:

You can download BenchMate 0.9.3 and add the manually installed Geekbench to the launcher.

Just start BenchMate and click the + button below the application list. Select the executable of Geekbench (Geekbench 4.exe) and it will be added to the list.

19 septembre 2019 cbjaust says:

@_mat_You have to remove that functionality for the next release, yeah?

19 septembre 2019 _mat_ says:

Yes, BenchMate 0.10 will NOT support Geekbench.

It will come with new benchmarks though like pifast. All integrations are in agreement with their respective developers. I will not throw days of work into the garbage anymore.

22 septembre 2019 MaddMutt says:

I just got my CB-20 (i7-8700k) black listed because the bench picture was covered. I was using BM 0.8.1 and sub the score at the beginning of the comp. I have since burned a cpu pin and will not be able to rebench the board. I thought this was the whole reason for the use of BM as it takes out the guess work. It also make up for when you make small mistakes like forgetting to include XX tab.

FYI -> The current leading team also has the CB-20 picture covered. Does this make theirs illegal??

Thank You

22 septembre 2019 Mr.Scott says:

49 minutes ago, MaddMutt said:

FYI -> The current leading team also has the CB-20 picture covered. Does this make theirs illegal??

Yes

Did you report it?