Détails du score

avatar

- Elite League

0sec 995ms avec 4x NVIDIA Titan V à 2100/1082MHz

Position dans le classement

n/a

Global 4x GPU classement:

n/a

4x Titan V classement:

Gallerie photos

Captures d'écran
GPUPI - 1B screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Youtube

Détails matériel

Détails Processeur

  • Modèle: Intel Core i9 7980XE 'Skylake-X'
  • Refroidissement: Water (Chilled/Cold)
  • Fréquence: 5 200MHz (+100.00%)
  • buy on amazon

Détails mémoire

Détails carte graphique

  • Modèle: 4x Titan V (GV100) NVIDIA
  • Refroidissement: Water (Chilled/Cold)
  • Fréquence: 2 100MHz (+75.00%) / 1 082MHz (+27.29%)
  • buy on amazon

Détails carte mère

Détails disque

Détails alimentation

Commentaires récents

H2o vs. Ln2 a commenté son propre score:

4X Titan V Hydro-Copper. ~ Dear NVidia...plz. enable NV Link on yours next Titan V driver... I'm ready.

South Africa randyenergy dit :

Excellent!!

Germany Dancop dit :

Not bad!

Romania poparamiro dit :

Pasiune si dedicatie, bravo!

United Kingdom GeorgeStorm dit :

Daym.

Japan ikki dit :

oh------!!

Nice run!!

South Africa Vivi dit :

whoaaa

United States Splave dit :

Core at 2925mhz? Or :D

H2o vs. Ln2 dit :

I am glad you are entertained Allen...just make me fart so badly :)

mickulty dit :

He actually did it, the absolute madman. Grats on an awesome score.

Germany Hyperhorn dit :

For me it's interesting to see that Vince's run is faster for all finished batches after the first one with an advantage of up to 28 ms after batch 9 finished. From "Batch 19 finished" to "PI value output" however his system needs 114 ms, while Slinky is noticably faster with 98 ms. At first you might think that the higher-clocked 7980X with faster RAM outperformed the lower clocked 7960X with slower RAM in this phase of the benchmark in some way, but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!

Greece OGS dit :

could it be the different version of gpupi?

Australia unityofsaints dit :

Yes it's just an efficiency thing. Nothing to see here folks, Vince rerun in 3,2,1...

Austria _mat_ dit :

..., but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!
Actually card #1 and #3 are the problem, card #2 was the most efficient. You have to look at the percentage of batches calculated, #2 did 32% of the whole calculation in about the same time as #1 did only 21%.

 

On the software part, there was only a minor upgrade of the CUDA toolkit between 3.0 and 3.1, so there shouldn't be much difference. I think this is a good case for hardware efficiency through better stability.

 

Well done, H2o! Try GPUPI 3.2 as well, it should have a little less overhead, because it doesn't use a physical log file on a disk anymore. That could scrape off another ms maybe. :P

Russian Federation Traktor dit :

Congrads! You Did it!

Russian Federation Nazar dit :

Great!

By the way, what waterblock you are using on VRM??

H2o vs. Ln2 dit :

same old ek-r5e, r4e or r4be I can't confirm sorry, have to be mod as only one size will fit the screw

Veuillez vous identifier ou enregister pour commenter