Ergebnis Details

avatar

- Elite League

0sec 995ms mit 4x Nvidia Titan V at 2100/1082MHz

Ranglisten Position

n.a.

Globaler 4x GPU Rang:

n/a

4x Titan V Rang:

Gewonnene Punkte

Mediengallerie

Bildschirmphoto
GPUPI - 1B screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Youtube

Hardware Details

CPU Details

  • Model: Intel Core i9 7980XE 'Skylake-X'
  • Kühlung: Water (Chilled/Cold)
  • Geschwindigkeit: 5.200Mhz (+100.00%)
  • buy on amazon

Arbeitsspeicher Details

VGA Details

  • Model: 4x Titan V (GV100') Nvidia
  • Kühlung: Water (Chilled/Cold)
  • Geschwindigkeit: 2.100Mhz (+75.00%) / 1.082Mhz (+27.29%)
  • buy on amazon

Mainboard Details

Festplatten Details

Netzteil Details

Neueste Kommentare

H2o vs. Ln2 Kommentierte sein eigenes Ergebnis:

4X Titan V Hydro-Copper. ~ Dear NVidia...plz. enable NV Link on yours next Titan V driver... I'm ready.

South Africa randyenergy sagt:

Excellent!!

Germany Dancop sagt:

Not bad!

Romania poparamiro sagt:

Pasiune si dedicatie, bravo!

United Kingdom GeorgeStorm sagt:

Daym.

Japan ikki sagt:

oh------!!

Nice run!!

South Africa Vivi sagt:

whoaaa

United States Splave sagt:

Core at 2925mhz? Or :D

H2o vs. Ln2 sagt:

I am glad you are entertained Allen...just make me fart so badly :)

mickulty sagt:

He actually did it, the absolute madman. Grats on an awesome score.

Germany Hyperhorn sagt:

For me it's interesting to see that Vince's run is faster for all finished batches after the first one with an advantage of up to 28 ms after batch 9 finished. From "Batch 19 finished" to "PI value output" however his system needs 114 ms, while Slinky is noticably faster with 98 ms. At first you might think that the higher-clocked 7980X with faster RAM outperformed the lower clocked 7960X with slower RAM in this phase of the benchmark in some way, but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!

Greece OGS sagt:

could it be the different version of gpupi?

Australia unityofsaints sagt:

Yes it's just an efficiency thing. Nothing to see here folks, Vince rerun in 3,2,1...

Austria _mat_ sagt:

..., but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!
Actually card #1 and #3 are the problem, card #2 was the most efficient. You have to look at the percentage of batches calculated, #2 did 32% of the whole calculation in about the same time as #1 did only 21%.

 

On the software part, there was only a minor upgrade of the CUDA toolkit between 3.0 and 3.1, so there shouldn't be much difference. I think this is a good case for hardware efficiency through better stability.

 

Well done, H2o! Try GPUPI 3.2 as well, it should have a little less overhead, because it doesn't use a physical log file on a disk anymore. That could scrape off another ms maybe. :P

Russian Federation Traktor sagt:

Congrads! You Did it!

Russian Federation Nazar sagt:

Great!

By the way, what waterblock you are using on VRM??

H2o vs. Ln2 sagt:

same old ek-r5e, r4e or r4be I can't confirm sorry, have to be mod as only one size will fit the screw

Bitte einloggen oder register to comment.