Submission details

avatar

- Elite League

0sec 995ms with 4x Nvidia Titan V at 2100/1082MHz

Ranking position

n/a

Global 4x GPU rank:

n/a

4x Titan V rank:

Points earned

Media gallery

Screenshots
GPUPI - 1B screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
screenshot
Youtube

Hardware details

CPU details

Memory details

VGA details

  • Model: 4x Titan V (GV100') Nvidia
  • Cooling: Water (Chilled/Cold)
  • Speed: 2,100MHz (+75.00%) / 1,082MHz (+27.29%)
  • buy on amazon

Mainboard details

Disk details

Power details

Recent Comments

H2o vs. Ln2 commented on his own score:

4X Titan V Hydro-Copper. ~ Dear NVidia...plz. enable NV Link on yours next Titan V driver... I'm ready.

South Africa randyenergy says:

Excellent!!

Germany Dancop says:

Not bad!

Romania poparamiro says:

Pasiune si dedicatie, bravo!

United Kingdom GeorgeStorm says:

Daym.

Japan ikki says:

oh------!!

Nice run!!

South Africa Vivi says:

whoaaa

United States Splave says:

Core at 2925mhz? Or :D

H2o vs. Ln2 says:

I am glad you are entertained Allen...just make me fart so badly :)

United Kingdom mickulty says:

He actually did it, the absolute madman. Grats on an awesome score.

Germany Hyperhorn says:

For me it's interesting to see that Vince's run is faster for all finished batches after the first one with an advantage of up to 28 ms after batch 9 finished. From "Batch 19 finished" to "PI value output" however his system needs 114 ms, while Slinky is noticably faster with 98 ms. At first you might think that the higher-clocked 7980X with faster RAM outperformed the lower clocked 7960X with slower RAM in this phase of the benchmark in some way, but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!

Greece OGS says:

could it be the different version of gpupi?

Australia unityofsaints says:

Yes it's just an efficiency thing. Nothing to see here folks, Vince rerun in 3,2,1...

Austria _mat_ says:

..., but watching at the statistics segment it seems that some small hickup with Titan V #2 lead to the loss of the WR. Slinky's values are way more even in comparison. Anyway, congratulations!
Actually card #1 and #3 are the problem, card #2 was the most efficient. You have to look at the percentage of batches calculated, #2 did 32% of the whole calculation in about the same time as #1 did only 21%.

 

On the software part, there was only a minor upgrade of the CUDA toolkit between 3.0 and 3.1, so there shouldn't be much difference. I think this is a good case for hardware efficiency through better stability.

 

Well done, H2o! Try GPUPI 3.2 as well, it should have a little less overhead, because it doesn't use a physical log file on a disk anymore. That could scrape off another ms maybe. :P

Russian Federation Traktor says:

Congrads! You Did it!

Russian Federation Nazar says:

Great!

By the way, what waterblock you are using on VRM??

H2o vs. Ln2 says:

same old ek-r5e, r4e or r4be I can't confirm sorry, have to be mod as only one size will fit the screw

Please log in or register to comment.