Submission Details
Stelaras`s 3DMark2001 SE score - Extreme League
19638 marks with NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800 at 420/400MHz
Ranking position
n/a
Global 1x GPU rank:
5th
GeForce4 Ti 4800 rank:
5th out of 12
Points earned for overclocker league
-
Global Points
Not Stelaras's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Points
5th using GeForce4 Ti 4800
5.0 Points
Points earned for team league
-
Global Team Power Points (GTPP) Not Hellas Overclocking Team's best submission
0.0 Points
-
Hardware Team Power Points (HTPP) 5th in team using GeForce4 Ti 4800
2.1 Points
Hardware details
CPU details
- Model: AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ (Barton) 'Barton'
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Cores: 3,050MHz(+63.45%)(ref/imc/qpi: 230//MHz)
Memory details
- Manufacturer: CORSAIR
- Type: DDR SD-RAM
- Speed: @ 226MHz
VGA details
- Model: GeForce4 Ti 4800 (NV28) NVIDIA
- Cooling: Liquid Nitrogen
- Speed: 420MHz (+40.00%) / 400MHz (+23.08%)
Mainboard details
- Manufacturer: Abit
- Model: NF7-S V2.0
- Cooling: Air (Custom)
- Chipset: nForce2 Ultra 400
-
Recent Comments
Stelaras commented on his own score:
Last minute run with a crappy CPU . My good one died during the first LN2 run at 3.3Ghz . There was much more to give , but unfortunatelly the CPU never posted again after the first restart . So , it seems 20K is achievable with a better CPU . As for this run , i didnt have time to make all the tweaks ... as the plexyglass which was holding the pot was cracking every few minutes .
lanbonden says:
Been waiting for your result and this is nothing less then amazing, shame we didnt get to see that 20k+ score
I.nfraR.ed says:
Bad luck, but not better for me either. I have no score.
SS seems to not hold at all (losing 1 deg per second on the evap), otherwise I could run at 3.2-3.3 just on phase.
Also problems with boards, because several CPUs did not post in AN7 and when I hooked up the chiller in the last hour, windows wouldn't start.
Not a bad score though. And you win the competition as well
Congrats!
ZFeSS says:
Congrats for the winner! Hope to see 20k from someone, but you scored really high.
We make all board mods - VDD, VMem and 3.3V PSU rail, but it didn't give us even 1MHz FSB. Anyway I wasn't expect 2nd place in stage 1 with Ti4200 and watercooling. Tweaks make a great boost in 01.
Did you get any boost from omega drivers?
Stermy57 says:
Omega driver gives zero improvement... win2000 + driver 42.xx or 43.xx with 2900mhz and agp 8x are the best combination. I was the first that submit this bench with win2000...
ZFeSS says:
Didn't get any additional marks for overclocking agp 4x to 88MHz. I think agp 8x is not necessary. Or you get some positive numbers?
Win2k is really a must. Few weeks ago I installed W2K and forget about XP. Used it only to define max clocks.
TASOS says:
Congrats Stelio !!!
Great score.
Too bad about your cpu.
I hope you can find an equally good one or even better.
Stermy57 says:
I have done 1-2 runs with ti 4200-8x vs ti 4600 and with same driver, same os, same frequency 8x gives a little boost.
Your ti 4200 isn't a very ti 4200... 4200-440-4600 are the same chip, you have a 4200 with 4600 pcb so it's a ti 4600
Stelaras says:
Thank you all for the kind comments . It helps ease the pain :D:D
It was a run made this morning (stopped benching at 4AM) , as i was a bit sad cause i lost my good CPU and didn't want to bench during the previous days.
Ivan , i agree . It was a stage with many problems . We lost one ti4600 & one ti4800 ... and one good 3.4Ghz 3D benchable XP-M . Wish i was living near you . I would repair your SS at no cost ... or maybe just one beer !
As for the mods , Vdd didn't help at all . The 3.3v line was at 3.55V and helped raising a few Mhz .
Only thing i know about Omega drivers is that they didn't score lower than the original drivers . Not much of a difference ... maybe 50 points . It was more a kind of "going back in time" , when we were using these kind of drivers .
Thanks again all of you !
Stelaras says:
You are right ! Win2k is more efficient for 3dmark2001 with these platforms . I knew it before this competition started !
Agp 8x scored a bit higher . 100-200 points max from what i remember.
lanbonden says:
I gained like ~200 points when going from 66 to 95MHz agp and it allowed slightly higher mem frequency for some reason.
This part about win2k however had I totaly missed, guess I have to try it out sometime
ZFeSS says:
It's more than regular Ti4400, but less than Ti4600. Ti4600 clocks a little bit better in general, and has 2.8ns mems. It's really hard to make 750+ on 3.3ns, with 2.8 you can push mems to 800. My second (3.3ns) card fails at 700 for example.
I.nfraR.ed says:
I had all needed weapons:
Windows 2000, AGP freq at 99MHz, Ti 4600 that does 440/820 on LN2 (I think mem freq would help more than AGP 8x on other cards), an XP-M able to bench Pi 32M at 3.5GHz, a board that does at least 260MHz stable FSB. And I didn't even make a single score...
It is my fault, because due to lack of time I postponed this until the very end and it always happens like this.
The SS was refilled 2 times already without any luck. It was dropping temps very slowly. I left it idle with system turned off and the evap temp dropped to -55. As soon as I start the system temperature keeps rising, CPU temp too.
So I don't know...it's either clogged or lost gas again.
Please log in or register to comment.