Author: Pieter-Jan Plaisier
It’s been a while since HWBOT hosted a proper research article. This mostly due to a pile of other work preventing me from digging into anything in-depth. Luckily, I’ve managed to find a small opening in the schedule to wrap this article up.
Everyone knows that the HWBOT database is filled with benchmark results, overclocking data and so much more. One of the perks of having a database like this is not only to amuse (and annoy) overclockers globally, but mainly to analyze the results afterwards and have a better understanding of how the overclocking game really works. Processor and video card charts are scattered around the website, but memory overclocking charts is something we haven’t touched before.
Although that last sentence was one of the reasons why I wanted to dig into the data we have on memory overclocking, it’s certainly not the most important one. I know, I know, some people see HWBOT as yet-another marketing website, but those who really understand what we do and how we look at marketing will know that the opposite is true. So, the main reason why I wanted to make memory recommendation charts is because I’m getting more and more fed up by the latest trend to use abnormally high timings and enabling B2B-Cas Delay for high frequency CPU-Z suicide shots and using those shots as some kind of proof that this memory kit is in fact the best you can get. No, people, no … DDR3-3000 CL10-15-10 B2B=31 is not the best you can get.
For those who don’t want the explanation and logic behind the charts, we’ve placed them on the first page of the article. For those who want to understand how these charts were build up, continue the long read.